• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

碰撞时间估计中的视觉信息与技能水平

Visual information and skill level in time-to-collision estimation.

作者信息

Cavallo V, Laurent M

机构信息

INRETS, Laboratoire de Psychologie, Arcueil, France.

出版信息

Perception. 1988;17(5):623-32. doi: 10.1068/p170623.

DOI:10.1068/p170623
PMID:3249670
Abstract

Previous studies on the visual origin of time-to-collision (Tc) information have demonstrated that Tc estimates can be based solely on the processing of target expansion rate (optic variable tau). But in the simulated situations used (film clips), there was little reliable information on speed (owing to reduced peripheral vision) and distance (owing to the absence of binocular distance cues) available. In order to determine whether these kinds of information are also taken into account, it is necessary to take an approach where the subject receives a more complete visual input. Thus, an experiment conducted on a circuit under actual driving conditions is reported. Experienced drivers and beginners, who were passengers in a car, had to indicate the moment they expected a collision with a stationary obstacle to take place. Subjects were blindfolded after a viewing time of 3 s. The conditions for speed evaluation (normal versus restricted visual field) and distance evaluation (binocular versus monocular vision) by subjects were varied. The approach speed (30 and 90 km h-1) and actual Tc (3 and 6 s) were also varied. The results show that accuracy of Tc estimation increased with (i) normal visual field, (ii) binocular vision, (iii) higher speeds, and (iv) driving experience. These findings have been interpreted as indicating that both speed and distance information are taken into account in Tc estimation. They suggest furthermore that these two kinds of information may be used differently depending on the skill level of the subject. The results are discussed in terms of the complementarity of the various potentially usable visual means of obtaining Tc information.

摘要

以往关于碰撞时间(Tc)信息视觉来源的研究表明,Tc估计可以仅基于目标扩展率(视觉变量tau)的处理。但在使用的模拟情境(电影片段)中,关于速度(由于周边视觉受限)和距离(由于缺乏双眼距离线索)的可靠信息很少。为了确定是否也考虑了这些信息,有必要采用一种让受试者获得更完整视觉输入的方法。因此,本文报告了一项在实际驾驶条件下在环形道路上进行的实验。有经验的驾驶员和初学者作为车内乘客,必须指出他们预计与静止障碍物发生碰撞的时刻。在观看3秒后,受试者被蒙上眼睛。受试者进行速度评估(正常视野与受限视野)和距离评估(双眼视觉与单眼视觉)的条件有所不同。接近速度(30和90公里/小时)和实际Tc(3和6秒)也有所变化。结果表明,Tc估计的准确性随着(i)正常视野、(ii)双眼视觉、(iii)更高速度和(iv)驾驶经验而提高。这些发现被解释为表明在Tc估计中同时考虑了速度和距离信息。它们还表明,这两种信息可能根据受试者的技能水平而有不同的使用方式。本文根据获取Tc信息的各种潜在可用视觉手段的互补性对结果进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Visual information and skill level in time-to-collision estimation.碰撞时间估计中的视觉信息与技能水平
Perception. 1988;17(5):623-32. doi: 10.1068/p170623.
2
Optic-flow and cognitive factors in time-to-collision estimates.碰撞时间估计中的光流和认知因素。
Perception. 1983;12(4):417-23. doi: 10.1068/p120417.
3
Implications of monocular vision for racing drivers.单眼视力对赛车手的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 16;14(12):e0226308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226308. eCollection 2019.
4
Drivers' estimates of time to collision.驾驶员对碰撞时间的估计。
Accid Anal Prev. 1994 Aug;26(4):511-20. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(94)90042-6.
5
Parallactic movement beats binocularity in the presence of external visual noise.在存在外部视觉噪声的情况下,视差运动胜过双眼视差。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2012 Jul;32(4):308-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00917.x.
6
The time course of estimating time-to-contact: switching between sources of information.估计接触时间的时间进程:在信息源之间进行切换。
Vision Res. 2013 Nov;92:53-8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
7
Intercepting a moving traffic gap while avoiding collision with lead and trail vehicles: gap-related and boundary-related influences on drivers' speed regulations during approach to an intersection.在交叉口接近过程中,为避免与前车和后车碰撞而切入移动的交通间隙:间隙相关和边界相关因素对驾驶员速度调节的影响。
Hum Mov Sci. 2012 Dec;31(6):1500-16. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2012.07.010. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
8
Effect of restriction of the binocular visual field on driving performance.双眼视野受限对驾驶性能的影响。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1992 Jul;12(3):291-8.
9
Monocular vision and increased distance reducing the effects of visual manipulation on body sway.单眼视觉和增加距离可减少视觉操纵对身体摇摆的影响。
Neurosci Lett. 2009 Sep 4;460(3):209-13. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.05.078. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
10
Robust Underestimation of Speed During Driving: A Field Study.驾驶过程中速度的严重低估:一项实地研究。
Perception. 2015 Dec;44(12):1356-70. doi: 10.1177/0301006615599137. Epub 2015 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Hello, is it me you're Stopping for? The Effect of external Human Machine Interface Familiarity on Pedestrians' Crossing Behaviour in an Ambiguous Situation.你好,你停下脚步是因为我吗?外部人机交互熟悉度对行人在模糊情境中过街行为的影响。
Hum Factors. 2025 Mar;67(3):264-279. doi: 10.1177/00187208241272070. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
2
Time-to-Collision Estimations in Young Drivers with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.自闭症谱系障碍和注意缺陷多动障碍青年驾驶员的碰撞时间估计。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2022 Sep;52(9):3933-3948. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05264-6. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
3
Accumulation of continuously time-varying sensory evidence constrains neural and behavioral responses in human collision threat detection.
连续时变感觉证据的积累约束了人类碰撞威胁检测中的神经和行为反应。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Jul 15;17(7):e1009096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009096. eCollection 2021 Jul.
4
Priming With Childhood Constructs Influences Distance Perception.用童年概念进行启动会影响距离感知。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 30;11:1184. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01184. eCollection 2020.
5
Drift-diffusion explains response variability and capacity for tracking objects.漂移扩散模型解释了反应的可变性和跟踪物体的能力。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 2;9(1):11224. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47624-4.
6
Preventing Emergency Vehicle Crashes: Status and Challenges of Human Factors Issues.预防应急车辆碰撞:人为因素问题的现状与挑战。
Hum Factors. 2018 Nov;60(7):1048-1072. doi: 10.1177/0018720818786132. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
7
Integration of speed and time for estimating time to contact.速度与时间的整合用于估计接触时间。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 20;115(12):E2879-E2887. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1713316115. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
8
A new approach for assessing and training drivers' speed management.一种评估和培训驾驶员速度管理的新方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Feb;111:266-270. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.12.002. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
9
Action ability modulates time-to-collision judgments.行动能力会调节对碰撞时间的判断。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Sep;235(9):2729-2739. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5008-2. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
10
Gaze movements and spatial working memory in collision avoidance: a traffic intersection task.避免碰撞中的注视运动与空间工作记忆:一项交通十字路口任务。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2013 Jun 6;7:62. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00062. eCollection 2013.