Cavallo V, Laurent M
INRETS, Laboratoire de Psychologie, Arcueil, France.
Perception. 1988;17(5):623-32. doi: 10.1068/p170623.
Previous studies on the visual origin of time-to-collision (Tc) information have demonstrated that Tc estimates can be based solely on the processing of target expansion rate (optic variable tau). But in the simulated situations used (film clips), there was little reliable information on speed (owing to reduced peripheral vision) and distance (owing to the absence of binocular distance cues) available. In order to determine whether these kinds of information are also taken into account, it is necessary to take an approach where the subject receives a more complete visual input. Thus, an experiment conducted on a circuit under actual driving conditions is reported. Experienced drivers and beginners, who were passengers in a car, had to indicate the moment they expected a collision with a stationary obstacle to take place. Subjects were blindfolded after a viewing time of 3 s. The conditions for speed evaluation (normal versus restricted visual field) and distance evaluation (binocular versus monocular vision) by subjects were varied. The approach speed (30 and 90 km h-1) and actual Tc (3 and 6 s) were also varied. The results show that accuracy of Tc estimation increased with (i) normal visual field, (ii) binocular vision, (iii) higher speeds, and (iv) driving experience. These findings have been interpreted as indicating that both speed and distance information are taken into account in Tc estimation. They suggest furthermore that these two kinds of information may be used differently depending on the skill level of the subject. The results are discussed in terms of the complementarity of the various potentially usable visual means of obtaining Tc information.
以往关于碰撞时间(Tc)信息视觉来源的研究表明,Tc估计可以仅基于目标扩展率(视觉变量tau)的处理。但在使用的模拟情境(电影片段)中,关于速度(由于周边视觉受限)和距离(由于缺乏双眼距离线索)的可靠信息很少。为了确定是否也考虑了这些信息,有必要采用一种让受试者获得更完整视觉输入的方法。因此,本文报告了一项在实际驾驶条件下在环形道路上进行的实验。有经验的驾驶员和初学者作为车内乘客,必须指出他们预计与静止障碍物发生碰撞的时刻。在观看3秒后,受试者被蒙上眼睛。受试者进行速度评估(正常视野与受限视野)和距离评估(双眼视觉与单眼视觉)的条件有所不同。接近速度(30和90公里/小时)和实际Tc(3和6秒)也有所变化。结果表明,Tc估计的准确性随着(i)正常视野、(ii)双眼视觉、(iii)更高速度和(iv)驾驶经验而提高。这些发现被解释为表明在Tc估计中同时考虑了速度和距离信息。它们还表明,这两种信息可能根据受试者的技能水平而有不同的使用方式。本文根据获取Tc信息的各种潜在可用视觉手段的互补性对结果进行了讨论。