• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

碰撞时间估计中的光流和认知因素。

Optic-flow and cognitive factors in time-to-collision estimates.

作者信息

McLeod R W, Ross H E

出版信息

Perception. 1983;12(4):417-23. doi: 10.1068/p120417.

DOI:10.1068/p120417
PMID:6672737
Abstract

Time-to-collision (Tc) estimates were obtained from twenty-four subjects who viewed film clips for varying lengths of time. The film clips showed the view from a moving car travelling towards a stationary target car, but ended 100 m before reaching the target. Viewing time varied from 2 to 6 s, approach velocity from 40 to 100 km h-1, and Tc from 3.6 to 9.0s. It was hypothesised that, if time were needed to calculate Tc, the accuracy of Tc estimates would increase with viewing time up to some maximum. However, the results showed no effect of viewing time, and this was taken to indicate that estimates were based upon information directly available from the changing optic array at the eye of the observer. A significant velocity effect was found, accuracy increasing with velocity. Since velocity was inversely correlated with Tc, this probably implies that accuracy decreases with increasing Tc. Sex differences were found, with males giving higher and more accurate estimates than females. The relevance of these findings to the nature of Tc information is discussed.

摘要

碰撞时间(Tc)估计值来自24名观看不同时长电影片段的受试者。电影片段展示了一辆行驶的汽车驶向一辆静止目标汽车的视角,但在到达目标前100米处结束。观看时间从2秒到6秒不等,接近速度从40公里/小时到100公里/小时不等,Tc从3.6秒到9.0秒不等。假设如果需要时间来计算Tc,那么Tc估计的准确性会随着观看时间的增加而提高,直至达到某个最大值。然而,结果显示观看时间没有影响,这被认为表明估计是基于观察者眼睛处不断变化的光学阵列直接提供的信息。发现了显著的速度效应,准确性随着速度的增加而提高。由于速度与Tc呈负相关,这可能意味着准确性随着Tc的增加而降低。发现了性别差异,男性的估计值更高且更准确。讨论了这些发现与Tc信息性质的相关性。

相似文献

1
Optic-flow and cognitive factors in time-to-collision estimates.碰撞时间估计中的光流和认知因素。
Perception. 1983;12(4):417-23. doi: 10.1068/p120417.
2
Visual information and skill level in time-to-collision estimation.碰撞时间估计中的视觉信息与技能水平
Perception. 1988;17(5):623-32. doi: 10.1068/p170623.
3
Estimation of time to vehicle arrival--effects of age on use of available visual information.估计车辆到达时间——年龄对可用视觉信息利用的影响。
Perception. 1994;23(8):947-55. doi: 10.1068/p230947.
4
Allocentric time-to-contact and the devastating effect of perspective.以自我为中心的接触时间与视角的毁灭性影响。
Vision Res. 2014 Dec;105:53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.08.022. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
5
Drivers' estimates of time to collision.驾驶员对碰撞时间的估计。
Accid Anal Prev. 1994 Aug;26(4):511-20. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(94)90042-6.
6
Evidence for good recovery of lengths of real objects seen with natural stereo viewing.
Perception. 1996;25(2):129-54. doi: 10.1068/p250129.
7
The relative contributions of radial and laminar optic flow to the perception of linear self-motion.径向和层流视觉流对线性自我运动感知的相对贡献。
J Vis. 2012 Sep 12;12(10):7. doi: 10.1167/12.10.7.
8
Do monocular time-to-collision estimates necessarily involve perceived distance?单眼碰撞时间估计是否必然涉及感知距离?
Perception. 1999;28(10):1257-64. doi: 10.1068/p2895.
9
Object motion perception is shaped by the motor control mechanism of ocular pursuit.物体运动感知受眼球追踪的运动控制机制影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2003 Feb;148(3):350-65. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1306-3. Epub 2002 Nov 20.
10
Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time to contact.接触时间感知中的实证与理论问题。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1991 Aug;17(3):865-76. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.17.3.865.

引用本文的文献

1
Human estimates of descending objects' motion are more accurate than those of ascending objects regardless of gravity information.无论重力信息如何,人类对下落物体运动的估计都比对上升物体的估计更准确。
J Vis. 2024 Mar 1;24(3):2. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.3.2.
2
The effect of background information and motion speed on the performance of TTC estimation.背景信息和运动速度对 TTC 估计性能的影响。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Jan 5;12(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01502-x.
3
Sex differences in learning and performing the Go/NoGo tasks.性别差异在执行 Go/NoGo 任务中的学习和表现。
Biol Sex Differ. 2023 May 3;14(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13293-023-00504-z.
4
Optic flow in the natural habitats of zebrafish supports spatial biases in visual self-motion estimation.斑马鱼自然栖息地中的光流支持视觉自身运动估计中的空间偏差。
Curr Biol. 2022 Dec 5;32(23):5008-5021.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.10.009. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
5
Time-to-Collision Estimations in Young Drivers with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.自闭症谱系障碍和注意缺陷多动障碍青年驾驶员的碰撞时间估计。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2022 Sep;52(9):3933-3948. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05264-6. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
6
Optic Flow: Perceiving and Acting in a 3-D World.光流:在三维世界中的感知与行动
Iperception. 2021 Feb 3;12(1):2041669520987257. doi: 10.1177/2041669520987257. eCollection 2021 Jan-Feb.
7
Toward a Theory of Visual Information Acquisition in Driving.驾驶中的视觉信息获取理论研究
Hum Factors. 2022 Jun;64(4):694-713. doi: 10.1177/0018720820939693. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
8
Gender Differences in Throwing Revisited: Sensorimotor Coordination in a Virtual Ball Aiming Task.重新审视投掷中的性别差异:虚拟球瞄准任务中的感觉运动协调
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Jul 18;13:231. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00231. eCollection 2019.
9
Drift-diffusion explains response variability and capacity for tracking objects.漂移扩散模型解释了反应的可变性和跟踪物体的能力。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 2;9(1):11224. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47624-4.
10
Action ability modulates time-to-collision judgments.行动能力会调节对碰撞时间的判断。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Sep;235(9):2729-2739. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5008-2. Epub 2017 Jun 12.