"De Gasperis" Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3, 20162 Milan, Italy.
"De Gasperis" Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3, 20162 Milan, Italy; School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Aug;31(6):370-379. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2020.05.008. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
Acute myocarditis (AM), a recent-onset inflammation of the heart, has heterogeneous clinical presentations, varying from minor symptoms to high-risk cardiac conditions with severe heart failure, refractory arrhythmias, and cardiogenic shock. AM is moving from being a definitive diagnosis based on histological evidence of inflammatory infiltrates on cardiac tissue to a working diagnosis supported by high sensitivity troponin increase in association with specific cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) findings. Though experts still diverge between those advocating for histological definition versus those supporting a mainly clinical definition of myocarditis, in the real-world practice the diagnosis of AM has undoubtedly shifted from being mainly biopsy-based to solely CMRI-based in most of clinical scenarios. It is thus important to clearly define selected settings where EMB is a must, as information derived from histology is essential for an optimal management. As in other medical conditions, a risk-based approach should be promoted in order to identify the most severe AM cases requiring appropriate bundles of care, including early recognition, transfer to tertiary centers, aggressive circulatory supports with inotropes and mechanical devices, histologic confirmation and eventual immunosuppressive therapy. Despite improvements in recognition and treatment of AM, including a broader use of promising mechanical circulatory supports, severe forms of AM are still burdened by dismal outcomes. This review is focused on recent clinical studies and registries that shed new insights on AM. Attention will be paid to contemporary outcomes and predictors of prognosis, the emerging entity of immune checkpoint inhibitors-associated myocarditis, updated CMRI diagnostic criteria, new data on the use of temporary mechanical circulatory supports in fulminant myocarditis. The role of viruses as etiologic agents will be reviewed and a brief update on pediatric AM is also provided. Finally, we summarize a risk-based approach to AM, based on available evidence and clinical experience.
急性心肌炎(AM)是一种新近发生的心肌炎症,其临床表现具有异质性,从轻症到高危心脏疾病不等,包括严重心力衰竭、难治性心律失常和心源性休克。AM 的诊断已从基于心脏组织炎症浸润的组织学证据的明确诊断转变为支持性诊断,其依据是高敏肌钙蛋白升高与特定心脏磁共振成像(CMRI)结果相关。尽管专家们在主张组织学定义的专家和支持主要基于临床定义的专家之间仍然存在分歧,但在实际临床实践中,AM 的诊断无疑已经从主要基于活检转变为在大多数临床情况下仅基于 CMRI。因此,明确界定需要进行心内膜心肌活检(EMB)的特定情况非常重要,因为组织学信息对于最佳管理至关重要。与其他医学病症一样,应推广基于风险的方法,以识别需要适当护理包的最严重 AM 病例,包括早期识别、转移至三级中心、使用正性肌力药物和机械装置进行积极的循环支持、组织学确认和最终的免疫抑制治疗。尽管 AM 的识别和治疗有所改善,包括更广泛地使用有前途的机械循环支持,但严重形式的 AM 仍因预后不良而备受困扰。本综述重点关注最近关于 AM 的临床研究和注册研究。将关注当代结局和预后预测因素、免疫检查点抑制剂相关心肌炎的新兴实体、CMRI 诊断标准的更新、在暴发性心肌炎中使用临时机械循环支持的新数据。病毒作为病因的作用将被回顾,并提供关于儿科 AM 的简要更新。最后,我们根据现有证据和临床经验总结了基于风险的 AM 处理方法。