Suppr超能文献

解释申请最近推广就地养老的长期护理计划的州差异的因素:医疗补助管理人员的观点。

Factors Explaining State Differences in Applying for a Recent Long-Term Care Program that Promotes Aging in Place: Perspectives of Medicaid Administrators.

机构信息

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.

Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

J Appl Gerontol. 2021 Sep;40(9):972-979. doi: 10.1177/0733464820924510. Epub 2020 Jun 5.

Abstract

Older adults in need of assistance often prefer to remain at home rather than receive care in an institution. To meet these preferences, Medicaid invited states to apply for the Balancing Incentive Program (BIP), a program intended to "rebalance" Medicaid-financed long-term services and supports to Home- and Community-Based Services (HCBS). However, only about half of eligible states applied. We interviewed Medicaid administrators to explore why some states applied for BIP whereas others did not. Supportive state leadership and the presence of other programs supporting community-based care were positively related to BIP application. Opposing policy priorities and programs competing for similar resources were negatively related to BIP application. Because states most likely to apply already had policy goals and programs supporting HCBS, BIP may inadvertently widen disparities across states, pushing those on the margins ahead and leaving the ones that are worst off in HCBS support to fall even further behind.

摘要

需要帮助的老年人通常更愿意留在家里,而不是在机构中接受护理。为了满足这些需求,医疗补助计划邀请各州申请平衡激励计划(BIP),该计划旨在“重新平衡”医疗补助资助的长期服务和支持,以转向以家庭和社区为基础的服务(HCBS)。然而,只有大约一半符合条件的州提出了申请。我们采访了医疗补助计划的管理人员,以探讨为什么有些州申请了 BIP,而有些州没有。支持性的州领导和其他支持社区护理的项目与 BIP 的申请呈正相关。相反的政策优先事项和竞争类似资源的项目与 BIP 的申请呈负相关。由于最有可能申请的州已经有了支持 HCBS 的政策目标和项目,BIP 可能会无意中扩大各州之间的差距,将那些处于边缘地位的州推向更前面,而让那些在 HCBS 支持方面最糟糕的州进一步落后。

相似文献

3
Perceived impacts of a Medicaid rebalancing initiative to increase home- and community-based services.
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56(6):1137-1145. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13696. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
4
A Comparative Case Study Analysis of Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing the Affordable Care Act's Balancing Incentive Program.
Res Aging. 2022 Mar-Apr;44(3-4):276-285. doi: 10.1177/01640275211020795. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
5
Medicaid home- and community-based services: impact of the affordable care act.
J Aging Soc Policy. 2012;24(2):169-87. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2012.659118.
6
Promises and Pitfalls of Health Information Technology for Home- and Community-Based Services.
J Appl Gerontol. 2021 May;40(5):558-565. doi: 10.1177/0733464820941364. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
7
A comparative analysis of state adoption of the Community First Choice program.
Home Health Care Serv Q. 2021 Jul-Sep;40(3):177-191. doi: 10.1080/01621424.2021.1947926. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
8
A National Examination Of Long-Term Care Setting, Outcomes, And Disparities Among Elderly Dual Eligibles.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Jul;38(7):1110-1118. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05409.
9
Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2024 Apr 1;49(2):289-313. doi: 10.1215/03616878-10989703.
10
Community integration of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A national longitudinal analysis.
Disabil Health J. 2017 Oct;10(4):616-620. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.12.018. Epub 2017 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Consolidating AAA on the Delivery of HCBS: Evidence From Iowa.
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Jul;39(7):751-759. doi: 10.1177/0733464818821055. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
3
Determinants of the Rigor of State Protection Policies for Persons With Dementia in Assisted Living.
J Aging Soc Policy. 2017 Mar-Apr;29(2):123-142. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2016.1236324. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
4
Predicting State Investment in Medicaid Home- and Community-Based Services, 2000-2011.
J Aging Soc Policy. 2016;28(1):49-64. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2016.1111729.
5
Qualitative research in age and ageing: enhancing understanding of ageing, health and illness.
Age Ageing. 2015 Sep;44(5):726-7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv096. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
7
Do Medicaid home and community based service waivers save money?
Home Health Care Serv Q. 2011 Oct;30(4):198-213. doi: 10.1080/01621424.2011.622249.
8
Five-year survival in a Program of All-inclusive Care for Elderly compared with alternative institutional and home- and community-based care.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010 Jul;65(7):721-6. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glq040. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
9
Home and community-based Medicaid options for dependent older Floridians.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Feb;58(2):371-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02668.x. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
10
Developing personal care programs: national trends and interstate variation, 1992-2002.
Inquiry. 2007 Spring;44(1):69-87. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_44.1.69.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验