• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭和社区服务中健康信息技术的承诺与挑战。

Promises and Pitfalls of Health Information Technology for Home- and Community-Based Services.

机构信息

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.

RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Gerontol. 2021 May;40(5):558-565. doi: 10.1177/0733464820941364. Epub 2020 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1177/0733464820941364
PMID:32723124
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7854857/
Abstract

Health information technology (HIT) use in home- and community-based services (HCBS) has been hindered by inadequate resources and incentives to support modernization. We sought to understand the ways the Medicaid Balancing Incentive Program (BIP) facilitated increased use of HIT to increase access to HCBS. Qualitative analysis of interviews with 30 Medicaid administrators, service agency providers, and consumer advocates. Although stakeholders perceived several benefits to greater HIT use, they highlighted critical challenges to effective adoption within the long-term services and supports (LTSS) system, including lack of extant expertise/knowledge about HIT, the limited reach of HIT among rural and disabled beneficiaries, burdensome procurement processes, and the ongoing resources required to maintain up-to-date HIT solutions. The structural reforms required by BIP gave states an opportunity to modernize their HCBS systems through use of HIT. However, barriers to HIT adoption persist, underscoring the need for continued support as part of future rebalancing efforts.

摘要

医疗保健信息技术(HIT)在家庭和社区服务(HCBS)中的使用受到资源不足和激励措施的限制,难以实现现代化。我们试图了解医疗补助平衡激励计划(BIP)促进更多使用 HIT 以增加 HCBS 机会的方式。对 30 名医疗补助管理人员、服务机构提供商和消费者权益倡导者的访谈进行定性分析。尽管利益相关者认为更多地使用 HIT 有几个好处,但他们强调了在长期服务和支持(LTSS)系统中有效采用 HIT 所面临的关键挑战,包括缺乏关于 HIT 的现有专业知识/知识、HIT 在农村和残疾受益人中的有限覆盖范围、繁琐的采购流程以及维护最新 HIT 解决方案所需的持续资源。BIP 要求的结构改革使各州有机会通过使用 HIT 来实现 HCBS 系统的现代化。然而,HIT 采用的障碍仍然存在,这突显了在未来的再平衡努力中需要持续支持。

相似文献

1
Promises and Pitfalls of Health Information Technology for Home- and Community-Based Services.家庭和社区服务中健康信息技术的承诺与挑战。
J Appl Gerontol. 2021 May;40(5):558-565. doi: 10.1177/0733464820941364. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
2
Perceived impacts of a Medicaid rebalancing initiative to increase home- and community-based services.医疗补助重新调整计划对增加家庭和社区服务的感知影响。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56(6):1137-1145. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13696. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
3
Rural-Urban Disparities in Access to Home- and Community-Based Services and Supports: Stakeholder Perspectives From 14 States.农村-城市地区在获得家庭和社区服务与支持方面的差距:来自 14 个州的利益相关者观点。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Apr;20(4):503-508.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.01.120. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
4
Federal Incentives to Reform Long-Term Care Under the Affordable Care Act: State Adoption of the Balancing Incentive Program, 2011-2014.平价医疗法案下的联邦长期护理改革激励措施:2011-2014 年各州对平衡激励计划的采纳。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Jan 12;77(1):191-200. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab031.
5
A Comparative Case Study Analysis of Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing the Affordable Care Act's Balancing Incentive Program.《平价医疗法案平衡激励计划实施的障碍与促进因素的比较案例研究分析》
Res Aging. 2022 Mar-Apr;44(3-4):276-285. doi: 10.1177/01640275211020795. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
6
Barriers and Facilitators to Home- and Community-Based Services Access for Persons With Dementia and Their Caregivers.痴呆症患者及其照护者获得居家和社区服务的障碍和促进因素。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2023 May 26;78(6):1085-1097. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbad039.
7
Medicaid home and community-based services spending for older adults: Is there a "woodwork" effect?医疗补助计划用于老年人居家和社区服务的支出:是否存在“潜在需求涌现”效应?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Oct;71(10):3143-3151. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18478. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
8
Factors Explaining State Differences in Applying for a Recent Long-Term Care Program that Promotes Aging in Place: Perspectives of Medicaid Administrators.解释申请最近推广就地养老的长期护理计划的州差异的因素:医疗补助管理人员的观点。
J Appl Gerontol. 2021 Sep;40(9):972-979. doi: 10.1177/0733464820924510. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
9
Long-term services and supports in the community: toward a research agenda.社区长期服务与支持:迈向研究议程。
Disabil Health J. 2015 Jan;8(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
10
The Affordable Care Act's "community first choice" option: Effect on long-term care expenditures.平价医疗法案的“社区首选”选项:对长期护理支出的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb;58(1):154-163. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14063. Epub 2022 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and travel time to diabetes prevention programs in Maryland.马里兰州社区社会经济劣势与前往糖尿病预防项目的出行时间
Health Place. 2025 Jul;94:103470. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2025.103470. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
2
Factors that influence the implementation of innovation in aged care: a scoping review.影响老年护理创新实施的因素:一项范围综述
JBI Evid Implement. 2023 Dec 29;22(1):61-80. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000407.
3
An HIT-Supported Care Coordination Framework for Reducing Structural Racism and Discrimination for Patients With ADRD.基于健康信息技术的支持的照护协调框架,以减少 ADRD 患者的结构性种族主义和歧视。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Nov;30(11):1171-1179. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2022.04.010. Epub 2022 May 6.
4
The effects of continuous care model using a smartphone application on adherence to treatment and self-efficacy among patients with multiple sclerosis.智能手机应用程序连续护理模式对多发性硬化症患者治疗依从性和自我效能的影响。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Feb 26;22(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01785-x.
5
Perceived impacts of a Medicaid rebalancing initiative to increase home- and community-based services.医疗补助重新调整计划对增加家庭和社区服务的感知影响。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56(6):1137-1145. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13696. Epub 2021 Jul 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting technology usage by health information need of older adults: Implications for eHealth technology.根据老年人的健康信息需求预测技术使用情况:对电子健康技术的启示。
Work. 2019;62(3):443-457. doi: 10.3233/WOR-192878.
2
The Impact of Consolidating AAA on the Delivery of HCBS: Evidence From Iowa.巩固 AAAs 对 HCBS 提供的影响:爱荷华州的证据。
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Jul;39(7):751-759. doi: 10.1177/0733464818821055. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
3
Patient Portal Use Among Older Adults: What Is Really Happening Nationwide?老年人使用患者门户:全国范围内实际情况如何?
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Apr;39(4):442-450. doi: 10.1177/0733464818776125. Epub 2018 May 21.
4
Patterns of Health Information Technology Use according to Sexual Orientation among US Adults Aged 50 and Older: Findings from a National Representative Sample-National Health Interview Survey 2013-2014.美国50岁及以上成年人按性取向划分的健康信息技术使用模式:来自全国代表性样本——2013 - 2014年国家健康访谈调查的结果
J Health Commun. 2017 Aug;22(8):666-671. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2017.1341566. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
5
Differences in Access to and Preferences for Using Patient Portals and Other eHealth Technologies Based on Race, Ethnicity, and Age: A Database and Survey Study of Seniors in a Large Health Plan.基于种族、族裔和年龄的患者门户网站及其他电子健康技术的使用机会和偏好差异:一项针对大型健康计划中老年人的数据库及调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 4;18(3):e50. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5105.
6
Health Information Technology Coordination to Support Patient-centered Care Coordination.健康信息技术协调以支持以患者为中心的护理协调。
Yearb Med Inform. 2015 Aug 13;10(1):34-7. doi: 10.15265/IY-2015-027.
7
Care fragmentation, quality, and costs among chronically ill patients.慢性病患者的医疗服务碎片化、质量及成本
Am J Manag Care. 2015 May;21(5):355-62.
8
Predictors of eHealth usage: insights on the digital divide from the Health Information National Trends Survey 2012.电子健康使用的预测因素:基于2012年健康信息国家趋势调查对数字鸿沟的洞察
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jul 16;16(7):e172. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3117.
9
An examination of the woodwork effect using national medicaid long-term services and supports data.利用国家医疗补助长期服务和支持数据考察木制品效应。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2013;25(2):134-45. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2013.766054.
10
The role of informatics in promoting patient-centered care.信息学在促进以患者为中心的护理中的作用。
Cancer J. 2011 Jul-Aug;17(4):211-8. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e318225ff89.