Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Sep;92(3):681-691.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.05.030. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
Contaminated duodenoscopes and linear echoendoscopes (DLEs) pose a risk for infectious outbreaks. To identify DLEs and reprocessing risk factors, we combined the data from the previously published nationwide cross-sectional PROCESS 1 study (Prevalence of contamination of complex endoscopes in the Netherlands) with the follow-up PROCESS 2 study.
We invited all 74 Dutch DLE centers to sample ≥2 duodenoscopes during PROCESS 1, and all duodenoscopes as well as linear echoendoscopes during PROCESS 2. The studies took place 1 year after another. Local staff sampled each DLE at ≤6 sites according to uniform methods explained by online videos. We used 2 contamination definitions: (1) any microorganism with ≥20 colony-forming units (CFU)/20 mL (AM20) and (2) presence of microorganisms with GI or oral origin, independent of CFU count (MGOs). We assessed the factors of age and usage by performing an analysis of pooled data of both PROCESS studies; additional factors including reprocessing characteristics were only recorded in PROCESS 2.
Ninety-seven percent of all Dutch centers (72 of 74; PROCESS 1, 66; PROCESS 2, 61) participated in one of the studies, sampling 309 duodenoscopes and 64 linear echoendoscopes. In total, 54 (17%) duodenoscopes and 8 (13%) linear echoendoscopes were contaminated according to the AM20 definition. MGOs were detected on 47 (15%) duodenoscopes and 9 (14%) linear echoendoscopes. Contamination was not age or usage dependent (all P values ≥.27) and was not shown to differ between the reprocessing characteristics (all P values ≥.01).
In these nationwide studies, we found that DLE contamination was independent of age and usage. These results suggest that old and heavily used DLEs, if maintained correctly, have a similar risk for contamination as new DLEs. The prevalence of MGO contamination of ∼15% was similarly high for duodenoscopes as for linear echoendoscopes, rendering patients undergoing ERCP and EUS at risk for transmission of microorganisms.
污染的十二指肠镜和线性回声内镜(DLE)存在感染爆发的风险。为了确定 DLE 和再处理的危险因素,我们将之前发表的全国性横断面 PROCESS 1 研究(荷兰复杂内镜污染的患病率)的数据与后续的 PROCESS 2 研究的数据相结合。
我们邀请了所有 74 个荷兰 DLE 中心在 PROCESS 1 期间对至少 2 个十二指肠镜进行采样,在 PROCESS 2 期间对所有十二指肠镜和线性回声内镜进行采样。这两项研究在一年后进行。当地工作人员根据在线视频中解释的统一方法,在≤6 个部位对每个 DLE 进行采样。我们使用了 2 种污染定义:(1)任何微生物≥20 菌落形成单位(CFU)/20 毫升(AM20)和(2)存在 GI 或口腔来源的微生物,与 CFU 计数无关(MGOs)。我们通过对两个 PROCESS 研究的 pooled 数据进行分析来评估年龄和使用因素;在 PROCESS 2 中仅记录了包括再处理特征在内的其他因素。
97%的荷兰中心(74 个中的 72 个;PROCESS 1,66 个;PROCESS 2,61 个)参加了其中一项研究,对 309 个十二指肠镜和 64 个线性回声内镜进行了采样。根据 AM20 定义,共有 54 个(17%)十二指肠镜和 8 个(13%)线性回声内镜受到污染。在 47 个(15%)十二指肠镜和 9 个(14%)线性回声内镜上检测到 MGOs。污染与年龄和使用无关(所有 P 值均≥.27),且与再处理特征之间无差异(所有 P 值均≥.01)。
在这些全国性研究中,我们发现 DLE 污染与年龄和使用无关。这些结果表明,如果正确维护,旧的和大量使用的 DLE 与新的 DLE 相比,具有相似的污染风险。十二指肠镜和线性回声内镜的 MGO 污染率均约为 15%,这使得接受 ERCP 和 EUS 的患者面临微生物传播的风险。