Suppr超能文献

强化反对堕胎的损害论据。

Strengthening the impairment argument against abortion.

作者信息

Blackshaw Bruce Philip, Hendricks Perry

机构信息

Philosophy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

Purdue University Department of Philosophy, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2020 Jun 5;47(7):515-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106153.

Abstract

Perry Hendricks' for the immorality of abortion is based on two premises: first, impairing a fetus with fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) is immoral, and second, if impairing an organism to some degree is immoral, then impairing it to a higher degree is also immoral. He calls this (TIP). Since abortion impairs a fetus to a higher degree than FAS, it follows from these two premises that abortion is immoral. Critics have focussed on the clause of TIP, which requires that the relevant details surrounding each impairment be sufficiently similar. In this article, we show that the clause is superfluous, and by replacing it with a more restrictive condition, the impairment argument is considerably strengthened.

摘要

佩里·亨德里克斯关于堕胎不道德的观点基于两个前提:第一,因胎儿酒精综合征(FAS)损害胎儿是不道德的;第二,如果在某种程度上损害一个有机体是不道德的,那么在更高程度上损害它也是不道德的。他将此称为(TIP)。由于堕胎对胎儿的损害程度高于FAS,从这两个前提可以得出堕胎是不道德的结论。批评者们聚焦于TIP的一致性条款,该条款要求每种损害周围的相关细节要足够相似。在本文中,我们表明一致性条款是多余的,通过用一个更具限制性的条件取代它,损害论证得到了显著加强。

相似文献

1
Strengthening the impairment argument against abortion.强化反对堕胎的损害论据。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Jun 5;47(7):515-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106153.
2
Fine-tuning the impairment argument.微调损伤论点。
J Med Ethics. 2021 Sep;47(9):641-642. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106904. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
4
The impairment argument for the immorality of abortion revisited.重新探讨堕胎不道德的损伤论证。
Bioethics. 2020 Feb;34(2):211-213. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12698. Epub 2019 Dec 1.
5
Abortion, Impairment, and Well-Being.堕胎、损伤与幸福
J Med Philos. 2023 Nov 3;48(6):541-550. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhad031.
7
Against the impairment argument: A reply to Hendricks.针对损害论证:对亨德里克斯的回应。
Bioethics. 2020 Oct;34(8):862-864. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12720. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
8
The impairment argument for the immorality of abortion: A reply.堕胎不道德的损害论证:回应。
Bioethics. 2019 Jul;33(6):723-724. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12576. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
9
Three Problems with the Impairment Argument.损伤论证的三个问题。
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2022 Nov 7;15(2):169-179. doi: 10.1007/s41649-022-00228-z. eCollection 2023 Apr.

引用本文的文献

1
The SIA Can't Just Go with the FLO.SIA 不能随波逐流。
HEC Forum. 2024 Sep;36(3):423-439. doi: 10.1007/s10730-023-09510-5. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
2
Impairing the impairment argument.损害论证的损害。
J Med Ethics. 2024 May 9;50(5):335-339. doi: 10.1136/jme-2023-109162.
3
Three Problems with the Impairment Argument.损伤论证的三个问题。
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2022 Nov 7;15(2):169-179. doi: 10.1007/s41649-022-00228-z. eCollection 2023 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Abusive Head Trauma in Infants and Children.婴儿和儿童虐待性头部创伤。
Pediatrics. 2020 Apr;145(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-0203. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
2
Against the impairment argument: A reply to Hendricks.针对损害论证:对亨德里克斯的回应。
Bioethics. 2020 Oct;34(8):862-864. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12720. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
3
The impairment argument for the immorality of abortion revisited.重新探讨堕胎不道德的损伤论证。
Bioethics. 2020 Feb;34(2):211-213. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12698. Epub 2019 Dec 1.
4
Abortion is incommensurable with fetal alcohol syndrome.堕胎与胎儿酒精综合征不可调和。
Bioethics. 2020 Feb;34(2):207-210. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12697. Epub 2019 Dec 1.
7
The impairment argument for the immorality of abortion: A reply.堕胎不道德的损害论证:回应。
Bioethics. 2019 Jul;33(6):723-724. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12576. Epub 2019 Apr 3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验