Ramsay Générale de Santé, Hôpital privé Jean Mermoz, Centre Orthopédique Santy, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, 24 Avenue Paul Santy, 69008, Lyon, France.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Jul;141(7):1101-1108. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03504-5. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
The past 2 decades have been marked by substantial progress in our knowledge of meniscus anatomy, function, and biomechanics, and also by the shifting of the surgical treatment of meniscal lesions from traditional meniscectomy towards arthroscopic repair to get away from the early osteoarthritis associated with meniscectomy. Posterior horn injuries of the lateral meniscus (LM) have been less studied due to their lower incidence and also due to the historical technical complexity of performing a repair in the posterolateral compartment.
A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed of all athletic patients who had a peripheral longitudinal tear of the lateral meniscal posterior horn and who underwent at least one repair procedure with a posterolateral approach between 2014 and 2018. The type of injury, extent of lateral meniscal tear, and characteristics of sutures placed were assessed. Clinical assessment included objective and subjective IKDC ratings. The Tegner activity level score was determined before the injury and at the last follow-up visit. Failure was defined as a need for revision surgery. All complications were documented.
The study population comprised 24 athletes with a mean follow-up of 25.2 ± 10 months. The Tegner activity level was exactly the same before the injury as after the surgery. The mean IKDC score significantly increased from 41.8 (12.2) before the surgery to 94.5 (9.1) after. There were four reoperations for failure (16.6%) that required a new suture repair. None of these revised repairs sustained a new failure as of the last follow-up.
Despite the long learning curve, the posterolateral approach is a safe and effective technique for longitudinal tears of the posterior horn of the LM. The results of all-inside suture repair through a posterolateral portal are comparable to other techniques.
在过去的 20 年中,我们对半月板解剖、功能和生物力学的认识取得了实质性的进展,半月板病变的手术治疗也从传统的半月板切除术转向关节镜下修复,以避免与半月板切除术相关的早期骨关节炎。外侧半月板(LM)后角损伤由于其发病率较低,以及在后外侧关节间隙进行修复的历史技术复杂性,研究较少。
对 2014 年至 2018 年间所有接受过外侧半月板后角周围纵向撕裂并至少进行过一次后外侧入路修复的运动患者进行前瞻性收集数据的回顾性分析。评估损伤类型、外侧半月板撕裂程度和放置缝线的特征。临床评估包括客观和主观 IKDC 评分。术前和末次随访时测定 Tegner 活动水平评分。失败定义为需要进行翻修手术。所有并发症均记录在案。
研究人群包括 24 名运动员,平均随访 25.2±10 个月。Tegner 活动水平与术前相同。平均 IKDC 评分从术前的 41.8(12.2)显著增加到术后的 94.5(9.1)。有 4 例因失败而进行了再次手术(16.6%),需要新的缝合修复。截至最后一次随访,没有任何一次修订修复发生新的失败。
尽管学习曲线较长,但后外侧入路是治疗 LM 后角纵向撕裂的一种安全有效的技术。经后外侧入路全内缝合修复的结果与其他技术相当。