Amirova Liubov, Navasiolava Nastassia, Rukavishvikov Ilya, Gauquelin-Koch Guillemette, Gharib Claude, Kozlovskaya Inessa, Custaud Marc-Antoine, Tomilovskaya Elena
Laboratory of Gravitational Physiology of the Sensorimotor System, Institute of Biomedical Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Laboratoire MITOVASC, UMR Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale 1083, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 6015, Université d'Angers, Angers, France.
Front Physiol. 2020 May 19;11:395. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00395. eCollection 2020.
The most applicable human models of weightlessness are -6° head-down bed rest (HDBR) and head-out dry immersion (DI). A detailed experimental comparison of cardiovascular responses in both models has not yet been carried out, in spite of numerous studies having been performed in each of the models separately.
We compared changes in central hemodynamics, autonomic regulation, plasma volume, and water balance induced by -6° HDBR and DI.
Eleven subjects participated in a 21-day HDBR and 12 subjects in a 3-day DI. During exposure, measurements of the water balance, blood pressure, and heart rate were performed daily. Plasma volume evolution was assessed by the Dill-Costill method. In order to assess orthostatic tolerance time (OTT), central hemodynamic responses to orthostatic stimuli, and autonomous regulation, the 80° lower body negative pressure-tilt test was conducted before and right after both exposures.
For most of the studied parameters, the changes were co-directional, although they differed in their extent. The changes in systolic blood pressure and total peripheral resistance after HDBR were more pronounced than those after DI. The OTT was decreased in both groups: to 14.2 ± 3.1 min (vs. 27.9 ± 2.5 min before exposure) in the group of 21-day HDBR and to 8.7 ± 2.1 min (vs. 27.7 ± 1.2 min before exposure) in the group of 3-day DI.
In general, cardiovascular changes during the 21-day HDBR and 3-day DI were co-directional. In some cases, changes in the parameters after 3-day DI exceeded changes after the 21-day HDBR, while in other cases the opposite was true. Significantly stronger effects of DI on cardiovascular function may be due to hypovolemia and support unloading (supportlessness).
最适用的人体失重模型是 -6°头低位卧床休息(HDBR)和头露出水面的干式浸没(DI)。尽管已经分别在这两种模型中进行了大量研究,但尚未对两种模型中的心血管反应进行详细的实验比较。
我们比较了 -6°HDBR 和 DI 引起的中心血流动力学、自主神经调节、血浆容量和水平衡的变化。
11名受试者参加了为期21天的HDBR,12名受试者参加了为期3天的DI。在暴露期间,每天测量水平衡、血压和心率。采用Dill-Costill法评估血浆容量变化。为了评估直立耐力时间(OTT)、中心血流动力学对直立刺激的反应以及自主调节,在两次暴露之前和之后立即进行80°下体负压倾斜试验。
对于大多数研究参数,变化是同向的,尽管程度不同。HDBR后收缩压和总外周阻力的变化比DI后更明显。两组的OTT均降低:21天HDBR组降至14.2±3.1分钟(vs.暴露前27.9±2.5分钟),3天DI组降至8.7±2.1分钟(vs.暴露前27.7±1.2分钟)。
一般来说,21天HDBR和3天DI期间的心血管变化是同向的。在某些情况下,3天DI后参数的变化超过21天HDBR后的变化,而在其他情况下则相反。DI对心血管功能的影响明显更强,可能是由于血容量减少和支撑卸载(无支撑)。