Suppr超能文献

大学生的应对策略与自我效能:一种以人为主的方法。

Coping Strategies and Self-Efficacy in University Students: A Person-Centered Approach.

作者信息

Freire Carlos, Ferradás María Del Mar, Regueiro Bibiana, Rodríguez Susana, Valle Antonio, Núñez José Carlos

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.

Department of Pedagogy and Didactics, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 May 19;11:841. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00841. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

In daily academic life, students are exposed to a wide range of potentially stressful situations which could negatively affect their academic achievement and their health. Among the factors that could be weakened by academic stress, attention has been paid to expectations of self-efficacy, which are considered one of the most important determinants for student engagement, persistence, and academic success. From a proactive perspective, research on academic stress has emphasized the importance of coping strategies in preventing harmful consequences. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in discovering the extent to which individuals are able to combine different coping strategies and the adaptive consequences this flexibility entails. However, studies using this person-centered approach are still scarce in the academic context. On that basis, this current study had two objectives: (a) to examine the existence of different profiles of university students based on how they combined different approach coping strategies (positive reappraisal, support seeking, and planning) and (b) to determine the existence of differences in general expectations of self-efficacy between those coping profiles. A total of 1,072 university students participated in the study. The coping profiles were determined by latent profile analysis (LPA). The differences in the self-efficacy variable were determined using ANCOVA, with gender, university year, and degree type as covariates. Four approach coping profiles were identified: (a) low generalized use of approach coping strategies; (b) predominance of social approach coping approaches; (c) predominance of cognitive approach coping approaches; and (d) high generalized use of approach coping strategies. The profile showed that a greater combination of the three strategies was related to higher general self-efficacy expectations and vice versa. These results suggest that encouraging flexibility in coping strategies would help to improve university students' self-efficacy.

摘要

在日常学术生活中,学生面临着各种各样潜在的压力情境,这些情境可能会对他们的学业成绩和健康产生负面影响。在可能因学业压力而被削弱的因素中,自我效能期望受到了关注,自我效能期望被认为是学生参与度、坚持性和学业成功的最重要决定因素之一。从积极主动的角度来看,关于学业压力的研究强调了应对策略在预防有害后果方面的重要性。近年来,人们越来越关注发现个体在多大程度上能够结合不同的应对策略以及这种灵活性所带来的适应性后果。然而,在学术背景下,采用这种以个人为中心方法的研究仍然很少。在此基础上,本研究有两个目标:(a)根据大学生如何结合不同的积极应对策略(积极重新评价、寻求支持和计划)来考察不同类型的存在情况;(b)确定这些应对类型在自我效能总体期望上是否存在差异。共有1072名大学生参与了这项研究。应对类型通过潜在类别分析(LPA)来确定。自我效能变量的差异采用协方差分析(ANCOVA)来确定,将性别、大学年级和学位类型作为协变量。确定了四种积极应对类型:(a)积极应对策略的普遍低使用;(b)社会积极应对方式占主导;(c)认知积极应对方式占主导;(d)积极应对策略的普遍高使用。该类型表明,这三种策略的更多组合与更高的总体自我效能期望相关,反之亦然。这些结果表明,鼓励应对策略的灵活性将有助于提高大学生的自我效能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8df7/7248269/d1553879bbdd/fpsyg-11-00841-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验