• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

听觉动态事件中的语言信息有助于检测精细而非粗略的事件边界。

Linguistic Information in Auditory Dynamic Events Contributes to the Detection of Fine, Not Coarse Event Boundaries.

作者信息

Papenmeier Frank, Maurer Annika E, Huff Markus

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany1.

Department of Research Infrastructures, German Institute for Adult Education, Bonn, Germany2.

出版信息

Adv Cogn Psychol. 2019 Mar 31;15(1):30-40. doi: 10.5709/acp-0254-9. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.5709/acp-0254-9
PMID:32509043
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7265132/
Abstract

Human observers (comprehenders) segment dynamic information into discrete events. That is, although there is continuous sensory information, comprehenders perceive boundaries between two meaningful units of information. In narrative comprehension, comprehenders use linguistic, non-linguistic , and physical cues for this event boundary perception. Yet, it is an open question - both from a theoretical and an empirical perspective - how linguistic and non-linguistic cues contribute to this process. The current study explores how linguistic cues contribute to the participants' ability to segment continuous auditory information into discrete, hierarchically structured events. Native speakers of German and non-native speakers, who neither spoke nor understood German, segmented a German audio drama into coarse and fine events. Whereas native participants could make use of linguistic, non-linguistic, and physical cues for segmentation, non-native participants could only use non-linguistic and physical cues. We analyzed segmentation behavior in terms of the ability to identify coarse and fine event boundaries and the resulting hierarchical structure. Non-native listeners identified almost identical coarse event boundaries as native listeners, but missed some of the fine event boundaries identified by the native listeners. Interestingly, hierarchical event perception (as measured by hierarchical alignment and enclosure) was comparable for native and non-native participants. In summary, linguistic cues contributed particularly to the identification of certain fine event boundaries. The results are discussed with regard to the current theories of event cognition.

摘要

人类观察者(理解者)会将动态信息分割成离散的事件。也就是说,尽管存在连续的感官信息,但理解者能够感知到两个有意义信息单元之间的界限。在叙事理解中,理解者会利用语言、非语言和物理线索来进行这种事件边界感知。然而,从理论和实证的角度来看,语言和非语言线索如何促成这一过程仍是一个悬而未决的问题。当前的研究探讨了语言线索如何影响参与者将连续听觉信息分割成离散的、层次结构分明的事件的能力。以德语为母语的人和既不会说也听不懂德语的非母语者将一部德语广播剧分割成粗略和精细的事件。母语参与者在分割时可以利用语言、非语言和物理线索,而非母语参与者只能使用非语言和物理线索。我们从识别粗略和精细事件边界的能力以及由此产生的层次结构方面分析了分割行为。非母语听众识别出的粗略事件边界与母语听众几乎相同,但错过了母语听众识别出的一些精细事件边界。有趣的是,母语和非母语参与者在层次事件感知方面(通过层次对齐和包含来衡量)是相当的。总之,语言线索尤其有助于识别某些精细事件边界。我们将结合当前的事件认知理论对研究结果进行讨论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f061/7265132/f0d92bf74064/acp-15-1-256-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f061/7265132/5cfdf638af81/acp-15-1-256-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f061/7265132/f0d92bf74064/acp-15-1-256-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f061/7265132/5cfdf638af81/acp-15-1-256-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f061/7265132/f0d92bf74064/acp-15-1-256-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Linguistic Information in Auditory Dynamic Events Contributes to the Detection of Fine, Not Coarse Event Boundaries.听觉动态事件中的语言信息有助于检测精细而非粗略的事件边界。
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2019 Mar 31;15(1):30-40. doi: 10.5709/acp-0254-9. eCollection 2019.
2
Simple visual cues of event boundaries.事件边界的简单视觉线索。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Jun;158:8-18. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
3
Effects of cues to event segmentation on subsequent memory.事件分割线索对后续记忆的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017;2(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s41235-016-0043-2. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
4
Age differences in the perception of goal structure in everyday activity.日常活动中目标结构感知的年龄差异。
Psychol Aging. 2019 Mar;34(2):187-201. doi: 10.1037/pag0000321. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
5
Making sense of abstract events: building event schemas.理解抽象事件:构建事件图式。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Sep;34(6):1221-35. doi: 10.3758/bf03193267.
6
On the predictability of event boundaries in discourse: An ERP investigation.论语篇中事件边界的可预测性:一项事件相关电位研究
Mem Cognit. 2018 Feb;46(2):315-325. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0766-4.
7
Neural correlates of prosodic boundary perception in German preschoolers: If pause is present, pitch can go.德国学龄前儿童韵律边界感知的神经关联:如果有停顿,音高可以变化。
Brain Res. 2016 Feb 1;1632:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.12.009. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
8
Experience with a second language affects the use of fundamental frequency in speech segmentation.对第二语言的体验会影响语音分割中基频的使用。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 24;12(7):e0181709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181709. eCollection 2017.
9
Event segmentation: Cross-linguistic differences in verbal and non-verbal tasks.事件分割:言语和非言语任务中的跨语言差异。
Cognition. 2018 Nov;180:225-237. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.07.008. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
10
Neural correlates of narrative shifts during auditory story comprehension.听觉故事理解过程中叙事转换的神经关联
Neuroimage. 2009 Aug 1;47(1):360-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.037. Epub 2009 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Event perception and event memory in real-world experience.现实世界体验中的事件感知与事件记忆。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2024 Nov;3(11):754-766. doi: 10.1038/s44159-024-00367-0. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
2
Effects of Language Proficiency on Selective Attention Patterns at Segmenting Boundaries in English Audio Sentences.语言能力对英语音频句子中分割边界处选择性注意模式的影响。
Brain Sci. 2024 Nov 28;14(12):1204. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14121204.
3
Bayesian Surprise Predicts Human Event Segmentation in Story Listening.贝叶斯惊奇预测故事倾听中的人类事件分割。

本文引用的文献

1
Construction and updating of event models in auditory event processing.听觉事件处理中事件模型的构建与更新。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Feb;44(2):307-320. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000482. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
2
Fandom Biases Retrospective Judgments Not Perception.粉丝偏见影响回顾性判断而非感知。
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 24;7:43083. doi: 10.1038/srep43083.
3
Seeing the unseen? Illusory causal filling in FIFA referees, players, and novices.看到不可见之物?国际足联裁判、球员和新手的虚幻因果填充
Cogn Sci. 2023 Oct;47(10):e13343. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13343.
4
Measuring event segmentation: An investigation into the stability of event boundary agreement across groups.测量事件分割:跨群体事件边界一致性稳定性的研究。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Jan;55(1):428-447. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01832-5. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
5
Cross-codal integration of bridging-event information in narrative understanding.跨码 bridging-event 信息在叙事理解中的整合。
Mem Cognit. 2020 Aug;48(6):942-956. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01039-z.
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2016;1(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s41235-016-0008-5. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
4
Neural bases of event knowledge and syntax integration in comprehension of complex sentences.复杂句子理解中事件知识与句法整合的神经基础。
Neurocase. 2015;21(6):753-66. doi: 10.1080/13554794.2014.989859. Epub 2014 Dec 20.
5
The role of relational triggers in event perception.关系触发因素在事件感知中的作用。
Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:14-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.030. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
6
Changes in situation models modulate processes of event perception in audiovisual narratives.情境模型的变化会调节视听叙事中事件感知的过程。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Sep;40(5):1377-88. doi: 10.1037/a0036780. Epub 2014 May 12.
7
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
8
Event segmentation ability uniquely predicts event memory.事件分割能力能独特地预测事件记忆。
Cognition. 2013 Nov;129(2):241-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
9
Kinematic signatures of telic and atelic events in ASL predicates.美国手语谓词中终态和非终态事件的运动特征
Lang Speech. 2012 Sep;55(Pt 3):407-21. doi: 10.1177/0023830911422201.
10
Event perception.事件感知
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011 Nov;2(6):608-620. doi: 10.1002/wcs.133. Epub 2010 Dec 23.