• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究数据库中乳腺癌的通用数据元素:一项系统综述。

Common data elements of breast cancer for research databases: A systematic review.

作者信息

Mirbagheri Esmat, Ahmadi Maryam, Salmanian Soraya

机构信息

Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Health Information Management, School of Management and Medical Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Mar 26;9(3):1296-1301. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_931_19. eCollection 2020 Mar.

DOI:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_931_19
PMID:32509607
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7266190/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Common Data Elements (CDEs) are data-metadata descriptors used to collect research study data. CDEs facilitate the collection, processing, and sharing of breast cancer data. This study intended to explore the CDEs of breast cancer for research databases and primary care systems.

METHODS

This study was conducted using systematic search and review. This systematic literature review covered PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, SID, ISC, Web of Science, and Google Scholar search engine. It included studies in English language with accessible full-text from the beginning of 2007 to September 2019.

RESULTS

Reviewing 25 studies revealed that 52 percent of studies were carried out in the US and most studies were conducted between 2013 and 2015. The most domains for using CDEs were: Pathology Report and Registry. The CDEs of breast cancer for research databases were categorized into three categories namely clinical, research, and non-clinical and indicate the importance of these data elements. Most of the studies focused on creating and deploying clinical CDEs as physical examination, clinical history and pathology data.

CONCLUSION

The integration of biomedical and clinical data relevant to breast cancer enhances the power of research variable analysis and statistical analysis, thereby facilitating improved knowledge of effective therapeutic interventions. Also CDEs used to collect, store, and retrieve patient data in various health setting such as primary care and research databases.

摘要

背景

通用数据元素(CDEs)是用于收集研究数据的数据元数据描述符。CDEs有助于乳腺癌数据的收集、处理和共享。本研究旨在探索用于研究数据库和初级保健系统的乳腺癌CDEs。

方法

本研究采用系统检索和综述的方法。该系统文献综述涵盖了PubMed、Scopus、Science Direct、SID、ISC、Web of Science和谷歌学术搜索引擎。纳入了2007年初至2019年9月期间英文撰写且可获取全文的研究。

结果

对25项研究的综述显示,52%的研究在美国开展,且大多数研究在2013年至2015年期间进行。使用CDEs的最主要领域是:病理报告和登记处。用于研究数据库的乳腺癌CDEs分为临床、研究和非临床三类,表明了这些数据元素的重要性。大多数研究集中于创建和部署临床CDEs,如体格检查、临床病史和病理数据。

结论

整合与乳腺癌相关的生物医学和临床数据可增强研究变量分析和统计分析的能力,从而有助于提高对有效治疗干预措施的认识。此外,CDEs用于在各种健康环境中收集、存储和检索患者数据,如初级保健和研究数据库。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb9b/7266190/8854543762e4/JFMPC-9-1296-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb9b/7266190/a440e3a21881/JFMPC-9-1296-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb9b/7266190/8854543762e4/JFMPC-9-1296-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb9b/7266190/a440e3a21881/JFMPC-9-1296-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb9b/7266190/8854543762e4/JFMPC-9-1296-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Common data elements of breast cancer for research databases: A systematic review.研究数据库中乳腺癌的通用数据元素:一项系统综述。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Mar 26;9(3):1296-1301. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_931_19. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Common Data Elements: Critical Assessment of Harmonization between Current Multi-Center Traumatic Brain Injury Studies.常见数据元素:当前多中心创伤性脑损伤研究之间协调的批判性评估。
J Neurotrauma. 2020 Jun 1;37(11):1283-1290. doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6867. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
4
Representation of Time-Relevant Common Data Elements in the Cancer Data Standards Repository: Statistical Evaluation of an Ontological Approach.癌症数据标准库中与时间相关的通用数据元素表示:本体方法的统计评估
JMIR Med Inform. 2018 Feb 22;6(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/medinform.8175.
5
FAIR data sharing: The roles of common data elements and harmonization.公平的数据共享:通用数据元素和协调的作用。
J Biomed Inform. 2020 Jul;107:103421. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103421. Epub 2020 May 12.
6
A common data language for clinical research studies: the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine Cerebral Palsy Common Data Elements Version 1.0 recommendations.用于临床研究的通用数据语言:美国国立神经病学与卒中研究所和美国脑瘫与发育医学学会脑瘫通用数据元素 1.0 版推荐标准。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018 Oct;60(10):976-986. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13723. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
7
Composite CDE: modeling composite relationships between common data elements for representing complex clinical data.组合 CDE:建模常见数据元素之间的组合关系,用于表示复杂的临床数据。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jul 3;20(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01168-0.
8
Pre-Clinical Common Data Elements for Traumatic Brain Injury Research: Progress and Use Cases.创伤性脑损伤研究的临床前通用数据元素:进展和用例。
J Neurotrauma. 2021 May 15;38(10):1399-1410. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7328. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
9
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and Department of Defense Sport-Related Concussion Common Data Elements Version 1.0 Recommendations.美国国立神经病学与卒中研究院和国防部运动相关性脑震荡通用数据元素 1.0 版推荐意见。
J Neurotrauma. 2018 Dec 1;35(23):2776-2783. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.5643. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
10
Common Data Elements for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms and Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Recommendations from the Working Group on Hospital Course and Acute Therapies-Proposal of a Multidisciplinary Research Group.未破裂颅内动脉瘤和蛛网膜下腔出血的常见数据元素:来自医院病程和急性治疗工作组的建议-多学科研究小组的建议。
Neurocrit Care. 2019 Jun;30(Suppl 1):36-45. doi: 10.1007/s12028-019-00726-3.

引用本文的文献

1
A CDE-based data structure for radiotherapeutic decision-making in breast cancer.一种基于临床决策要素的乳腺癌放射治疗决策数据结构。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03036-1.
2
Visualization of research trend of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer treatment: a bibliometric analysis.乳腺癌新辅助化疗治疗研究趋势的可视化分析:一项文献计量学分析
Discov Oncol. 2025 Jun 19;16(1):1154. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02950-0.
3
CORAL: Expert-Curated Oncology Reports to Advance Language Model Inference.

本文引用的文献

1
Adherence to quality breast cancer survivorship care in four Canadian provinces: a CanIMPACT retrospective cohort study.在加拿大四个省份坚持进行高质量的乳腺癌生存者护理:一项 CanIMPACT 回顾性队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jul 4;19(1):659. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5882-z.
2
Health care services use among long-term breast cancer survivors: a systematic review.长期乳腺癌幸存者的医疗保健服务利用情况:系统评价。
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Jun;13(3):477-493. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00755-z. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
3
From Big Data to Precision Medicine.从大数据到精准医学。
CORAL:经专家策划的肿瘤学报告,以推进语言模型推理。
NEJM AI. 2024 Apr;1(4). doi: 10.1056/aidbp2300110. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
4
Establishing core data elements for colorectal cancer and mapping to FHIR resources: Towards interoperable Iranian health information systems.建立结直肠癌的核心数据元素并映射到FHIR资源:迈向可互操作的伊朗健康信息系统。
J Educ Health Promot. 2025 Jan 31;14:13. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1834_23. eCollection 2025.
5
Prediction of successful aging using ensemble machine learning algorithms.利用集成机器学习算法预测成功老龄化。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Oct 3;22(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-02001-6.
6
Developing the minimum data set of the corrosive ingestion registry system in Iran.制定伊朗腐蚀性摄入登记系统的最小数据集。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 27;22(1):1207. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08576-0.
7
Identifying a minimum data set as a necessity to design a web-based personal health record for patients under chronic dialysis.确定一个最小数据集是为慢性透析患者设计基于网络的个人健康记录的必要条件。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Mar;11(3):969-975. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_978_21. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
8
Establishing a minimum data set for suicide and attempted suicide registry system in Iran.建立伊朗自杀和自杀未遂登记系统的最小数据集。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 29;22(1):857. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13276-9.
9
Consensus core clinical data elements for meningiomas (v2021.1).共识核心临床数据元素用于脑膜瘤(v2021.1)。
Neuro Oncol. 2022 May 4;24(5):683-693. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab259.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Mar 1;6:34. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00034. eCollection 2019.
4
Data Harmonization for a Molecularly Driven Health System.分子驱动型健康系统的数据协调。
Cell. 2018 Aug 23;174(5):1045-1048. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.012.
5
Linkage of the ACR National Mammography Database to the Network of State Cancer Registries: Proof of Concept Evaluation by the ACR National Mammography Database Committee.ACR 国家乳腺数据库与州癌症登记处网络的链接:ACR 国家乳腺数据库委员会的概念验证评估。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Jan;16(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.06.027. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
6
A collection of annotated and harmonized human breast cancer transcriptome datasets, including immunologic classification.一组经过注释和协调的人类乳腺癌转录组数据集,包括免疫分类。
F1000Res. 2017 Mar 20;6:296. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.10960.2. eCollection 2017.
7
Can routine data be used to support cancer clinical trials? A historical baseline on which to build: retrospective linkage of data from the TACT (CRUK 01/001) breast cancer trial and the National Cancer Data Repository.常规数据能否用于支持癌症临床试验?构建历史基线:TACT(CRUK 01/001)乳腺癌试验数据与国家癌症数据存储库的数据回顾性关联。
Trials. 2017 Nov 23;18(1):561. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2308-6.
8
Electronic Health Record Phenotypes for Precision Medicine: Perspectives and Caveats From Treatment of Breast Cancer at a Single Institution.电子健康记录表型在精准医疗中的应用:单机构乳腺癌治疗的观点和注意事项。
Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Jan;11(1):85-92. doi: 10.1111/cts.12514.
9
A validation of clinical data captured from a novel Cancer Care Quality Program directly integrated with administrative claims data.对从与行政索赔数据直接整合的新型癌症护理质量项目中获取的临床数据进行验证。
Pragmat Obs Res. 2017 Aug 26;8:149-155. doi: 10.2147/POR.S140579. eCollection 2017.
10
Electronic health records to facilitate clinical research.电子健康记录助力临床研究。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2017 Jan;106(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s00392-016-1025-6. Epub 2016 Aug 24.