Suppr超能文献

在特定的快速康复全髋关节置换术中,使用氯普鲁卡因进行脊髓麻醉是安全、有效的,且有助于早期出院。

Spinal Anesthesia Using Chloroprocaine is Safe, Effective, and Facilitates Earlier Discharge in Selected Fast-track Total Hip Arthroplasty.

作者信息

Herndon Carl L, Martinez Roxana, Sarpong Nana O, Geller Jeffrey A, Shah Roshan P, Cooper H John

机构信息

Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Arthroplast Today. 2020 Jun 1;6(3):305-308. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.04.007. eCollection 2020 Sep.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Spinal anesthetic choice plays an underappreciated role in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Chloroprocaine, a short-acting local anesthetic, has been limited to short-duration ambulatory procedures and has not been studied in THA. We compare perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing fast-track THA using chloroprocaine spinal anesthesia with those who have surgery with a longer-acting agent (bupivacaine).

METHODS

A total of 143 THAs performed under spinal anesthesia by 3 arthroplasty surgeons between November 2018 and July 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients receiving chloroprocaine were matched 1:1 by demographics to patients receiving bupivacaine. Ultimately, 74 patients were included (37 chloroprocaine and 37 bupivacaine). The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LOS). Other perioperative outcomes were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 37 patients (50%) received chloroprocaine (60 mg), whereas 37 (50%) received bupivacaine (median 10 mg, range 8-15 mg). Among the matched groups, chloroprocaine use was associated with shorter hospital LOS (0.9 vs 1.2 days;  = .03), shorter operative time (68.2 vs 83.6 minutes,  = .03), lower estimated blood loss (184.7 vs 218.9 mL,  = .02), shorter postanesthesia care unit LOS (139.4 vs 194.9 minutes;  = .04), and less intraoperative hypotension (59.5% vs 83.8%,  = .02). Patients receiving chloroprocaine were also more commonly discharged home (100% vs 89.2%;  = .04).

CONCLUSION

Chloroprocaine is a safe and reliable option for patients to mobilize rapidly and leave the hospital sooner after THA. Compared with bupivacaine, it is associated with shorter hospital LOS and higher likelihood for discharge to home.

摘要

背景

脊髓麻醉的选择在全髋关节置换术(THA)中起着未被充分重视的作用。氯普鲁卡因是一种短效局部麻醉剂,一直局限于短时间的门诊手术,尚未在THA中进行研究。我们比较了使用氯普鲁卡因脊髓麻醉进行快速通道THA的患者与使用长效麻醉剂(布比卡因)进行手术的患者的围手术期结局。

方法

回顾性分析了2018年11月至2019年7月期间3名关节置换外科医生在脊髓麻醉下进行的143例THA。接受氯普鲁卡因的患者按人口统计学特征与接受布比卡因的患者1:1匹配。最终,纳入了74例患者(37例氯普鲁卡因组和37例布比卡因组)。主要结局是住院时间(LOS)。还评估了其他围手术期结局。

结果

共有37例患者(50%)接受氯普鲁卡因(60mg),而37例(50%)接受布比卡因(中位数10mg,范围8 - 15mg)。在匹配组中,使用氯普鲁卡因与较短的住院LOS相关(0.9天对1.2天;P = 0.03),较短的手术时间(68.2分钟对83.6分钟,P = 0.03),较低的估计失血量(184.7mL对218.9mL,P = 0.02),较短的麻醉后护理单元LOS(139.4分钟对194.9分钟;P = 0.04)以及较少的术中低血压(59.5%对83.8%,P = 0.02)。接受氯普鲁卡因的患者也更常出院回家(100%对89.2%;P = 0.04)。

结论

氯普鲁卡因是THA后患者快速活动并早日出院的安全可靠选择。与布比卡因相比,它与较短的住院LOS和更高的出院回家可能性相关。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验