• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于精神卫生服务的世界卫生组织五条目幸福指数的心理测量特性:一项系统评价方案

Psychometric properties of the Five-item World Health Organization Well-being Index used in mental health services: Protocol for a systematic review.

作者信息

Lara-Cabrera Mariela L, Bjørkly Stål, De Las Cuevas Carlos, Pedersen Sindre Andre, Mundal Ingunn Pernille

机构信息

Division of Mental Health, Department of Research and Development, St Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.

Department of Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2020 Sep;76(9):2426-2433. doi: 10.1111/jan.14445. Epub 2020 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1111/jan.14445
PMID:32510656
Abstract

AIMS

To synthesize evidence of the psychometric properties of the Five-item World Health Organization Well-being Index in mental health settings and critically appraise the methodologies of the included studies.

DESIGN

Protocol for a systematic psychometric review.

METHODS

The review protocol has been registered in the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews. The bibliographic databases MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science will be searched for relevant studies. The psychometric properties of each study will be evaluated according to the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurements Instruments.

DISCUSSION

The results of our psychometric review will synthesize the psychometric properties of the Five-item World Health Organization Well-being Index in mental health settings and identify possible gaps in the literature regarding methodological quality and its reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change.

IMPACT

The evaluation of patient well-being is important, and the Five-item World Health Organization Well-being Index is an increasingly used patient-reported outcome measure. It is simple to collect, free to use, and consists of five questions using positive health statements. Although the number of studies assessing the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the questionnaire is increasing worldwide, there is a need to summarize the existing evidence of the psychometric properties of this questionnaire. The proposed study's findings will contribute to future research recommendations and help midwives and nurses in different settings pick an effective, appropriate questionnaire to evaluate patient well-being.

摘要

目的

综合心理健康环境中世界卫生组织幸福指数五项指标的心理测量属性证据,并严格评估纳入研究的方法。

设计

系统心理测量学综述方案。

方法

该综述方案已在国际前瞻性系统综述注册库中注册。将检索MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science等文献数据库以查找相关研究。每项研究的心理测量属性将根据基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准进行评估。

讨论

我们心理测量学综述的结果将综合心理健康环境中世界卫生组织幸福指数五项指标的心理测量属性,并确定文献中在方法学质量及其可靠性、有效性和对变化的反应性方面可能存在的差距。

影响

患者幸福感评估很重要,世界卫生组织幸福指数五项指标是一种越来越常用的患者报告结局指标。它易于收集、免费使用,由五个使用积极健康陈述的问题组成。尽管全球范围内评估该问卷有效性、可靠性和反应性的研究数量在增加,但仍需要总结该问卷心理测量属性的现有证据。拟议研究的结果将有助于未来的研究建议,并帮助不同环境中的助产士和护士选择有效、合适的问卷来评估患者的幸福感。

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Five-item World Health Organization Well-being Index used in mental health services: Protocol for a systematic review.用于精神卫生服务的世界卫生组织五条目幸福指数的心理测量特性:一项系统评价方案
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Sep;76(9):2426-2433. doi: 10.1111/jan.14445. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
2
Measurement properties of scales assessing new graduate nurses' clinical competence: A systematic review of psychometric properties.评估新毕业护士临床能力的量表的测量特性:心理测量特性的系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Oct;110:103734. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103734. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
3
Implementation outcome assessment instruments used in physical healthcare settings and their measurement properties: a systematic review protocol.用于物理医疗保健环境的实施结果评估工具及其测量特性:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 8;7(10):e017972. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017972.
4
The dietary knowledge measurement instruments in diabetes: A systematic psychometric review.糖尿病饮食知识测量工具:系统心理测量学评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Jun;77(6):2595-2622. doi: 10.1111/jan.14762. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
5
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
6
Protocol for a systematic review exploring the psychometric properties of self-report health-related quality of life and subjective wellbeing measures used by adolescents with intellectual disabilities.针对智障青少年使用的自我报告健康相关生活质量和主观幸福感测量工具的心理测量特性的系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2022 May 2;11(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01957-w.
7
Suffering measurement instruments in palliative care: protocol for a systematic psychometric review.舒缓治疗中痛苦测量工具的系统心理测量学评价研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 3;9(4):e027524. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027524.
8
A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify measures of breakthrough pain and evaluate their psychometric properties.用于系统评价和荟萃分析的方案,旨在识别突破性疼痛的测量指标并评估其心理测量学特性。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 29;10(3):e035541. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035541.
9
Psychometric properties of instruments measuring quality and satisfaction in mental health: A systematic review.测量心理健康质量和满意度的工具的心理计量学特性:系统评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Nov;74(11):2497-2510. doi: 10.1111/jan.13813. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
10
Psychometric properties of the sit-to-stand test for patients with pulmonary hypertension: A systematic review protocol.肺高血压患者起立测试的心理测量学特性:系统综述方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 5;17(10):e0275646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275646. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-country validation of the Arabic version of the WHO-5 Well-Being Index in non-clinical young adults from six Arab countries.世界卫生组织-5福祉指数阿拉伯语版本在六个阿拉伯国家非临床年轻成年人中的跨国验证。
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2025 Aug 19;12:e95. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2025.10051. eCollection 2025.
2
The outpatient experience questionnaire for child and adolescent mental health services: reliability and validity following a nationwide survey.儿童和青少年心理健康服务门诊体验问卷:全国性调查后的信效度研究
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 Feb 18;9(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s41687-025-00852-x.
3
Effects of pain education on disability, pain, quality of life, and self-efficacy in chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial.
疼痛教育对慢性腰背痛患者残疾、疼痛、生活质量和自我效能的影响:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2024 May 28;19(5):e0294302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294302. eCollection 2024.
4
Validation and optimal cut-off score of the World Health Organization Well-being Index (WHO-5) as a screening tool for depression among patients with schizophrenia.验证和最佳截断值的世界卫生组织幸福指数(WHO-5)作为一种筛查工具,用于筛查精神分裂症患者的抑郁症。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 May 23;24(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05814-z.
5
The importance of rapid assessment tools in evaluating mental health in emergency departments among patients with chronic diseases.在评估慢性病患者在急诊科的心理健康时,快速评估工具的重要性。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 1;12:1258749. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1258749. eCollection 2024.
6
Impact on health and well-being of working at home during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间在家工作对健康和幸福的影响。
Rev Bras Med Trab. 2022 Mar 30;20(1):79-85. doi: 10.47626/1679-4435-2022-791. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
7
Psychometric Properties of the WHO-5 Well-Being Index among Nurses during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study in Three Countries.在 COVID-19 大流行期间护士的 WHO-5 幸福感指数的心理测量特性:三个国家的横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 16;19(16):10106. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610106.
8
Patient-reported outcome measures for life engagement in mental health: a systematic review.心理健康中生活参与度的患者报告结局指标:一项系统综述
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Jun 10;6(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00468-5.