Suppr超能文献

评估 C 反应蛋白与白蛋白比值与孤立性冠状动脉瘤扩张的存在及严重程度的关系。

Assessment of the Relationship Between C-Reactive Protein-to-Albumin Ratio and the Presence and Severity of Isolated Coronary Artery Ectasia.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, 472606Ordu University Faculty of Medicine, Turkey.

出版信息

Angiology. 2020 Oct;71(9):840-846. doi: 10.1177/0003319720930983. Epub 2020 Jun 10.

Abstract

We investigated the relationship between C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) and coronary artery ectasia (CAE). The retrospective study population included 150 patients with isolated CAE, 150 with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), and 150 with a normal coronary artery angiogram (NCA). The severity of isolated CAE was determined according to the Markis classification. C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio was significantly higher in patients with isolated CAE than in those with obstructive CAD and NCA (10.5 [5.9-30.9], 5.7 [1.8-13.2] and 3.0 [0.9-8.9], respectively). Logistic regression analysis showed that CAR (odds ratio [OR]: 3.054, 95% CI: 1.021-9.165, = .001), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR; OR: 1.330, 95% CI: 1.025-1.694, = .044), and monocyte-to-high density cholesterol ratio (MHR; OR: 1.031, 95% CI: 1.009-1.054, = .006) were independently associated with the presence of isolated CAE. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that CAR (area under the curve [AUC] ± standard error [SE] = 0.838 ± 0.016; < .001) had a stronger diagnostic value for detecting significant CAE than PLR (AUC ± SE = 0.632 ± 0.023) and MHR (AUC ± SE = 0.726 ± 0.022). C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio had a significantly strong correlation with the severity of isolated CAE (r = 0.536, < .001). To the best of our knowledge, this study showed for the first time that CAR was significantly associated with CAE presence and severity.

摘要

我们研究了 C 反应蛋白与白蛋白比值(CAR)与冠状动脉扩张(CAE)之间的关系。回顾性研究人群包括 150 例孤立性 CAE 患者、150 例阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者和 150 例正常冠状动脉造影(NCA)患者。孤立性 CAE 的严重程度根据 Markis 分类确定。与阻塞性 CAD 和 NCA 患者相比,孤立性 CAE 患者的 CAR 明显更高(10.5[5.9-30.9]、5.7[1.8-13.2]和 3.0[0.9-8.9])。Logistic 回归分析显示,CAR(比值比[OR]:3.054,95%置信区间:1.021-9.165, =.001)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR;OR:1.330,95%置信区间:1.025-1.694, =.044)和单核细胞与高密度胆固醇比值(MHR;OR:1.031,95%置信区间:1.009-1.054, =.006)与孤立性 CAE 的存在独立相关。受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,CAR(曲线下面积[AUC]±标准误[SE] = 0.838±0.016; <.001)对检测显著 CAE 的诊断价值强于 PLR(AUC±SE = 0.632±0.023)和 MHR(AUC±SE = 0.726±0.022)。CAR 与孤立性 CAE 的严重程度呈显著正相关(r = 0.536, <.001)。据我们所知,这项研究首次表明 CAR 与 CAE 的存在和严重程度显著相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验