• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Women and evaluation of inequalities in the distribution of risk factors for Chronic non-communicable diseases (NCD), Vigitel 2016-2017.女性与慢性非传染性疾病（NCD）风险因素分布不平等评估，2016 - 2017年巴西成人健康调查（Vigitel）
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2020 Jun 5;23:e200058. doi: 10.1590/1980-549720200058. eCollection 2020.
2
Distribution of indicators for chronic non-communicable diseases in adult women beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries of the Bolsa Família Program - Vigitel 2016-2019.慢性非传染性疾病指标在 Bolsa Família 计划成年女性受益人和非受益人间的分布——Vigitel 2016-2019。
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2021 Apr 16;24(suppl 1):e210011. doi: 10.1590/1980-549720210011.supl.1. eCollection 2021.
3
Indicators of chronic noncommunicable diseases in women of reproductive age that are beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries of Bolsa Família.领取和未领取家庭补助金的育龄妇女慢性非传染性疾病指标。
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2019 Oct 7;22Suppl 02(Suppl 02):E190012.SUPL.2. doi: 10.1590/1980-549720190012.supl.2. eCollection 2019.
4
Gender and schooling inequalities in risk and protective factors for chronic diseases among Brazilian adults, through telephone survey.通过电话调查研究巴西成年人慢性病风险和保护因素中的性别与受教育程度不平等问题。
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2011 Sep;14 Suppl 1:125-35. doi: 10.1590/s1415-790x2011000500013.
5
Risk and protection factors for chronic non communicable diseases by telephone survey--VIGITEL-2009.通过电话调查评估慢性非传染性疾病的风险和保护因素——2009年巴西成人健康调查
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2011 Sep;14 Suppl 1:90-102. doi: 10.1590/s1415-790x2011000500010.
6
Risk and protective factors for non communicable diseases in the Belo Horizonte population: Vigitel 2008.贝洛奥里藏特市人群非传染性疾病的风险和保护因素：2008年 Vigitel调查
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;16(3):572-81. doi: 10.1590/s1415-790x2013000300002.
7
Risk and protective factors for chronic diseases by telephone survey in capitals of Brazil, Vigitel 2014.2014年巴西各首府城市通过电话调查得出的慢性病风险因素及保护因素，《Vigitel 2014》
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;18 Suppl 2:238-55. doi: 10.1590/1980-5497201500060021.
8
[Risk and protective factors for chronic non-communicable diseases: the VIGITEL telephone disease surveillance system, Brazil, 2007].[慢性非传染性疾病的风险和保护因素：巴西VIGITEL电话疾病监测系统，2007年]
Cad Saude Publica. 2011 Mar;27(3):486-96. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2011000300009.
9
Self-rated health and associated factors, Brazil, 2006.自评健康状况及其相关因素，巴西，2006 年。
Rev Saude Publica. 2009 Nov;43 Suppl 2:27-37. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102009000900005.
10
Influence of the Bolsa Família program on nutritional status and food frequency of schoolchildren.“家庭补助金”计划对学童营养状况和食物频率的影响。
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2016 Jul-Aug;92(4):381-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2015.10.008. Epub 2016 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Health effects of the Brazilian Conditional Cash Transfer programme over 20 years and projections to 2030: a retrospective analysis and modelling study.巴西有条件现金转移支付计划20年的健康影响及到2030年的预测：一项回顾性分析与建模研究
Lancet Public Health. 2025 Jul;10(7):e548-e558. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(25)00091-X. Epub 2025 May 29.
2
The food environment in favelas is associated with the presence of arterial hypertension and diabetes in socially vulnerable women.贫民窟的食物环境与社会弱势女性患动脉高血压和糖尿病有关。
Public Health Nutr. 2025 Feb 3;28(1):e44. doi: 10.1017/S1368980025000175.
3
Awareness of the diagnosis, treatment, and control of diabetes mellitus in Brazil.巴西民众对糖尿病的诊断、治疗和控制的认知情况。
Rev Saude Publica. 2023 Nov 3;57:75. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057005167. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Fiscal austerity measures hamper noncommunicable disease control goals in Brazil.财政紧缩措施阻碍了巴西的非传染性疾病控制目标。
Cien Saude Colet. 2018 Oct;23(10):3115-3122. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320182310.25222018.
2
Surveillance System for Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases by Telephone Survey (Vigitel): changes in weighting methodology.通过电话调查进行慢性病风险和保护因素监测系统（Vigitel）：加权方法的变化
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017 Oct-Dec;26(4):701-712. doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742017000400003.
3
Health inequalities: a global perspective.健康不平等：全球视角
Cien Saude Colet. 2017 Jul;22(7):2097-2108. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232017227.02742017.
4
The impact of the Bolsa Família Program on food consumption: a comparative study of the southeast and northeast regions of Brazil.巴西家庭补助金计划对食品消费的影响：巴西东南部和东北部地区的比较研究。
Cien Saude Colet. 2017 Jun;22(6):1771-1780. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232017226.25852016.
5
Health Effects of Overweight and Obesity in 195 Countries over 25 Years.25年间195个国家超重和肥胖对健康的影响
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 6;377(1):13-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614362. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
6
Use of and access to health services in Brazil, 2013 National Health Survey.《2013年巴西全国健康调查：巴西卫生服务的使用与获取情况》
Rev Saude Publica. 2017 Jun 1;51(suppl 1):3s. doi: 10.1590/S1518-8787.2017051000074.
7
Factors associated with self-reported diabetes according to the 2013 National Health Survey.根据2013年全国健康调查，与自我报告的糖尿病相关的因素。
Rev Saude Publica. 2017 Jun 1;51(suppl 1):12s. doi: 10.1590/S1518-8787.2017051000011.
8
Prevalence of and factors associated with self-reported high blood pressure in Brazilian adults.巴西成年人自我报告的高血压患病率及相关因素
Rev Saude Publica. 2017 Jun 1;51(suppl 1):11s. doi: 10.1590/S1518-8787.2017051000006.
9
Socioeconomic status and the 25 × 25 risk factors as determinants of premature mortality: a multicohort study and meta-analysis of 1·7 million men and women.社会经济地位及25×25风险因素作为过早死亡的决定因素：一项针对170万男性和女性的多队列研究及荟萃分析
Lancet. 2017 Mar 25;389(10075):1229-1237. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32380-7. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
10
[Correction of self-reported prevalence in epidemiological studies with large samples].[大样本流行病学研究中自我报告患病率的校正]
Cad Saude Publica. 2016 Dec 15;32(12):e00050816. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00050816.

女性与慢性非传染性疾病（NCD）风险因素分布不平等评估，2016 - 2017年巴西成人健康调查（Vigitel）

Women and evaluation of inequalities in the distribution of risk factors for Chronic non-communicable diseases (NCD), Vigitel 2016-2017.

作者信息

Malta Deborah Carvalho, Bernal Regina Tomie Ivata, Carvalho Quéren Hapuque de, Pell Jill P, Dundas Ruth, Leyland Alastair, Vasconcelos Leda Lúcia Couto de, Cardoso Lais Santos de Magalhaes, Stopa Sheila Rizzato, Barreto Mauricio Lima

机构信息

Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil.

Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Lilybank Gardens - Glasgow, Reino Unido.

出版信息

Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2020 Jun 5;23:e200058. doi: 10.1590/1980-549720200058. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1590/1980-549720200058
PMID:32520106
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7613912/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the distribution of chronic non-communicable diseases (CNCD) indicators among adult female beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries of the Bolsa Família Program (BFP) in Brazilian capitals.

METHODS

Analysis of Vigitel telephone survey data in 2016 and 2017. Gross and adjusted prevalence ratios (PR) and their respective confidence intervals were estimated using Poisson Regression model.

RESULTS

Women with BF have lower schooling, are young people, live more frequently in the Northeast and North of the country. Higher prevalence of risk factors were found in woman receiving BF. The adjusted PR of the BF women were: smokers (PR = 1.98), overweight (PR = 1.21), obesity (PR = 1.63), fruits and vegetables (PR = 0.63), consumption of soft drinks (PR = 1.68), bean consumption (PR = 1.25), physical activity at leisure (PR = 0.65), physical activity at home (PR = 1.35), time watching TV (PR = 1.37), self-assessment of poor health status (PR =2.04), mammography (PR = 0.86), Pap smears (PR = 0.91), hypertension (PR = 1.46) and diabetes (PR = 1,66). When women were compared among strata of the same schooling, these differences were reduced.

CONCLUSION

Worst indicators among women receiving BF reflect social inequalities inherent in this most vulnerable group. The study also shows that BF is being targeted at the most vulnerable women.

摘要

目的

比较巴西各首府城市中，“家庭补助金计划”（BFP）成年女性受益人和非受益人之间慢性非传染性疾病（CNCD）指标的分布情况。

方法

分析2016年和2017年的Vigitel电话调查数据。使用泊松回归模型估计总体患病率和调整患病率及其各自的置信区间。

结果

领取家庭补助金的女性受教育程度较低，较为年轻，更多居住在该国东北部和北部地区。领取家庭补助金的女性中风险因素的患病率更高。领取家庭补助金女性的调整患病率分别为：吸烟者（PR = 1.98）、超重（PR = 1.21）、肥胖（PR = 1.63）、水果和蔬菜（PR = 0.63）、软饮料消费（PR = 1.68）、豆类消费（PR = 1.25）、休闲时身体活动（PR = 0.65）、在家身体活动（PR = 1.35）、看电视时间（PR = 1.37）、自我评估健康状况差（PR = 2.04）、乳房X光检查（PR = 0.86）、巴氏涂片检查（PR = 0.91）、高血压（PR = 1.46）和糖尿病（PR = 1.66）。当在相同教育水平的阶层中对女性进行比较时，这些差异有所减小。

结论

领取家庭补助金女性中较差的指标反映了这一最弱势群体固有的社会不平等。该研究还表明，家庭补助金计划的目标人群是最弱势的女性。