Suppr超能文献

评估一种用于复苏后护理期间无创估计动脉二氧化碳的新公式。

Evaluating a novel formula for noninvasive estimation of arterial carbon dioxide during post-resuscitation care.

作者信息

Rentola Raisa R, Skrifvars Markus B, Heinonen Erkki, Häggblom Tom, Hästbacka Johanna

机构信息

Division of Intensive Care, Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Department of Emergency Care and Services, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 Oct;64(9):1287-1294. doi: 10.1111/aas.13652. Epub 2020 Jul 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Controlling arterial carbon dioxide is paramount in mechanically ventilated patients, and an accurate and continuous noninvasive monitoring method would optimize management in dynamic situations. In this study, we validated and further refined formulas for estimating partial pressure of carbon dioxide with respiratory gas and pulse oximetry data in mechanically ventilated cardiac arrest patients.

METHODS

A total of 4741 data sets were collected retrospectively from 233 resuscitated patients undergoing therapeutic hypothermia. The original formula used to analyze the data is PaCO -est1 = PETCO  + k[(PIO  - PETCO ) - PaO ]. To achieve better accuracy, we further modified the formula to PaCO -est2 = k *PETCO  + k *(PIO  - PETCO ) + k *(100-SpO ). The coefficients were determined by identifying the minimal difference between the measured and calculated arterial carbon dioxide values in a development set. The accuracy of these two methods was compared with the estimation of the partial pressure of carbon dioxide using end-tidal carbon dioxide.

RESULTS

With PaCO -est1, the mean difference between the partial pressure of carbon dioxide, and the estimated carbon dioxide was 0.08 kPa (SE ±0.003); with PaCO -est2 the difference was 0.036 kPa (SE ±0.009). The mean difference between the partial pressure of carbon dioxide and end-tidal carbon dioxide was 0.72 kPa (SE ±0.01). In a mixed linear model, there was a significant difference between the estimation using end-tidal carbon dioxide and PaCO -est1 (P < .001) and PaCO -est2 (P < .001) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel formula appears to provide an accurate, continuous, and noninvasive estimation of arterial carbon dioxide.

摘要

背景

在机械通气患者中,控制动脉血二氧化碳至关重要,一种准确且连续的无创监测方法将优化动态情况下的管理。在本研究中,我们验证并进一步完善了利用机械通气心脏骤停患者的呼吸气体和脉搏血氧饱和度数据估算二氧化碳分压的公式。

方法

回顾性收集了233例接受治疗性低温的复苏患者的4741组数据集。用于分析数据的原始公式为PaCO -est1 = PETCO + k[(PIO - PETCO) - PaO]。为了获得更高的准确性,我们将公式进一步修改为PaCO -est2 = k *PETCO + k *(PIO - PETCO) + k *(100 - SpO)。通过确定开发集中测量的和计算的动脉血二氧化碳值之间的最小差异来确定系数。将这两种方法的准确性与使用呼气末二氧化碳估算二氧化碳分压的方法进行比较。

结果

使用PaCO -est1时,二氧化碳分压与估算的二氧化碳之间的平均差异为0.08 kPa(标准误±0.003);使用PaCO -est时,差异为kPa(标准误±0.009)。二氧化碳分压与呼气末二氧化碳之间的平均差异为0.72 kPa(标准误±0.01)。在混合线性模型中,使用呼气末二氧化碳估算与PaCO -est1(P <.001)和PaCO -est2(P <.001)之间分别存在显著差异。

结论

这种新公式似乎能提供准确、连续且无创的动脉血二氧化碳估算。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验