• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一种新颖的社会孵化器,以促进贫困地区的健康促进计划。

Development of a novel social incubator for health promoting initiatives in a disadvantaged region.

机构信息

Department of Population Health, Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, POB 1589, Henrietta Szold 8, 1311502, Safed, Israel.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 10;20(1):898. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08990-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-020-08990-1
PMID:32522166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7285712/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bottom-up approaches to disparity reduction present a departure from traditional service models where health services are traditionally delivered top-down. Raphael, a novel bottom-up social incubator, was developed in a disadvantaged region with the aim of 'hatching' innovative health improvement interventions through academia-community partnership.

METHODS

Community organizations were invited to submit proposals for incubation. Selection was made using the criteria of innovation, population neediness and potential for health impact and sustainability. Raphael partnered with organizations to pilot and evaluate their intervention with $5000 seed-funding. The evaluation was guided by the conceptual framework of technological incubators. Outcomes and sustainability were ascertained through qualitative and quantitative analysis of records and interviews at 12 months and 3-5 years, and the Community Impact of Research Oriented Partnerships (CIROP) questionnaire was administered to community partners.

RESULTS

Ninety proposals were submitted between 2013 and 2015 principally from non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Thirteen interventions were selected for 'incubation'. Twelve successfully 'hatched': three demonstrated sustainability with extension locally or nationally through acquiring external competitive funding; six continued to have influence within their organizations; three failed to continue beyond the pilot. Benefits to the organisations included acquisition of skills including advocacy, teaching and health promotion, evaluation skills and ability to utilize acquired knowledge for implementation. CIROP demonstrated that individuals' research skills were reported to improve (mean ± sd) 4.80 ± 2.49 along with confidence in being able to use knowledge acquired in everyday practice (5.50 ± 1.38) and new connections were facilitated (5.33 ± 2.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Raphael, devised as a 'social incubator', succeeded in nurturing novel ideas engendered by community organizations that aimed to impact on health disparities. Judging by success rates of technological incubators its goals were realized to a considerable degree.

摘要

背景

从传统的服务模式(即传统上自上而下提供卫生服务)出发,减少差异的方法有很多种。Raphael 是一种新颖的自下而上的社会孵化器,它是在一个劣势地区开发的,旨在通过学术界-社区伙伴关系“孵化”创新的改善健康的干预措施。

方法

社区组织被邀请提交孵化提案。选择是根据创新、人口需求和对健康影响和可持续性的潜力等标准进行的。Raphael 与组织合作,为他们的干预措施提供 5000 美元的种子资金进行试点和评估。评估是根据技术孵化器的概念框架进行的。通过对 12 个月和 3-5 年的记录和访谈进行定性和定量分析,以及对社区伙伴进行社区导向的伙伴关系影响问卷(CIROP)调查,确定了结果和可持续性。

结果

2013 年至 2015 年期间共提交了 90 份提案,主要来自非政府组织(NGO)。有 13 项干预措施被选中进行“孵化”。有 12 项成功“孵化”:其中 3 项通过获得外部竞争资金在当地或全国范围内实现了可持续性;6 项继续在其组织内产生影响;3 项试点后未能继续。组织获得的收益包括获得了包括宣传、教学和健康促进、评估技能以及将获得的知识用于实施的能力等技能。CIROP 表明,个人的研究技能据报告有所提高(平均值±标准差)4.80±2.49,以及对能够在日常实践中运用所学知识的信心(5.50±1.38)也有所提高,并且还促进了新的联系。

结论

Raphael 作为一种“社会孵化器”,成功地培育了社区组织提出的旨在影响健康差异的新想法。从技术孵化器的成功率来看,它的目标在很大程度上实现了。

相似文献

1
Development of a novel social incubator for health promoting initiatives in a disadvantaged region.开发一种新颖的社会孵化器,以促进贫困地区的健康促进计划。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 10;20(1):898. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08990-1.
2
Implementing a Community Empowerment Center to Build Capacity for Developing, Implementing, and Sustaining Interventions to Promote Community Health.建立一个社区赋权中心,以增强制定、实施和维持促进社区健康干预措施的能力。
J Community Health. 2015 Dec;40(6):1122-9. doi: 10.1007/s10900-015-0038-9.
3
Building on a YMCA's health and physical activity promotion capacities: A case study of a researcher-organization partnership to optimize adolescent programming_.基于基督教青年会的健康与体育活动推广能力:一项关于研究人员与组织合作优化青少年项目的案例研究
Eval Program Plann. 2016 Aug;57:30-8. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
4
Applying social innovation theory to examine how community co-designed health services develop: using a case study approach and mixed methods.应用社会创新理论审视社区共同设计的卫生服务如何发展:采用案例研究方法和混合研究方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 31;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2852-0.
5
Participatory evaluation of a community-academic partnership to inform capacity-building and sustainability.社区-学术伙伴关系的参与式评估,以指导能力建设和可持续性发展。
Eval Program Plann. 2015 Oct;52:19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
6
Building capacity in disadvantaged communities: development of the community advocacy and leadership program.增强弱势群体社区的能力:社区倡导与领导力项目的开展
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Spring;9(1):113-27. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0003.
7
A stakeholder analysis of community-led collaboration to reduce health inequity in a deprived neighbourhood in South Korea.社区主导合作减少韩国贫困社区健康不平等的利益相关者分析。
Glob Health Promot. 2020 Jun;27(2):35-44. doi: 10.1177/1757975918791517. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
8
From Roots to Results: A Qualitative Case Study of the Evolution of a Public Health Leadership Institute Building Capacity in Collaborating for Equity and Justice.从根源到成果:关于一个公共卫生领导力机构在促进公平与正义合作中能力建设演变的定性案例研究
Health Educ Behav. 2019 Oct;46(1_suppl):33S-43S. doi: 10.1177/1090198119853616.
9
How community sport programs may improve the health of vulnerable population groups: a program theory.社区体育项目如何改善弱势群体的健康状况:一种项目理论。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 May 24;19(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01177-5.
10
Key considerations for logic model development in research partnerships: a Canadian case study.研究合作中逻辑模型开发的关键考量因素:一项加拿大案例研究。
Eval Program Plann. 2007 May;30(2):115-24. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.01.002. Epub 2007 Jan 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Assisting primary care teams and patients in a culturally diverse periphery: impact on medical students' future career choices.协助多元文化边缘地区的基层医疗团队和患者:对医学生未来职业选择的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 14;24(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05272-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Enhancing Capacity of Community-Academic Partnerships to Achieve Health Equity: Results From the CBPR Partnership Academy.增强社区-学术伙伴关系的能力以实现健康公平:基于 CBPR 伙伴关系学院的研究结果。
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Jul;21(4):552-563. doi: 10.1177/1524839918818830. Epub 2018 Dec 29.
2
A conceptual framework for evaluating health equity promotion within community-based participatory research partnerships.一个用于评估基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系中健康公平促进情况的概念框架。
Eval Program Plann. 2018 Oct;70:25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
3
Inequalities in non-communicable diseases between the major population groups in Israel: achievements and challenges.以色列主要人群间非传染性疾病的不平等:成就与挑战。
Lancet. 2017 Jun 24;389(10088):2531-2541. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30574-3. Epub 2017 May 8.
4
Involving lay community researchers in epidemiological research: experiences from a seroprevalence study among sub-Saharan African migrants.让非专业社区研究人员参与流行病学研究:撒哈拉以南非洲移民血清流行率研究的经验
AIDS Care. 2016;28 Suppl 1(sup1):119-23. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1146398. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
5
Community coalition-driven interventions to reduce health disparities among racial and ethnic minority populations.由社区联盟推动的干预措施,以减少种族和少数族裔人群之间的健康差距。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 15;2015(6):CD009905. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009905.pub2.
6
Social determinants of health equity.健康公平的社会决定因素。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Sep;104 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S517-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302200.
7
The promise of community-based participatory research for health equity: a conceptual model for bridging evidence with policy.基于社区的参与式研究对健康公平的承诺:将证据与政策联系起来的概念模型。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Sep;104(9):1615-23. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301961. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
8
Thirty years of disparities intervention research: what are we doing to close racial and ethnic gaps in health care?三十年的差异干预研究:我们在做什么来缩小医疗保健中的种族和民族差距?
Med Care. 2013 Nov;51(11):1020-6. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182a97ba3.
9
Community Diabetes Education (CoDE) for uninsured Mexican Americans: a randomized controlled trial of a culturally tailored diabetes education and management program led by a community health worker.社区糖尿病教育(CoDE)在未参保墨西哥裔美国人中的应用:一项由社区卫生工作者主导的、具有文化适应性的糖尿病教育和管理项目的随机对照试验。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013 Apr;100(1):19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.01.027. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
10
Evaluating community-based participatory research to improve community-partnered science and community health.评估基于社区的参与性研究,以改善社区合作科学和社区健康。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Fall;6(3):289-99. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0049.