评估基于社区的参与性研究，以改善社区合作科学和社区健康。
Evaluating community-based participatory research to improve community-partnered science and community health.
作者信息
Hicks Sarah, Duran Bonnie, Wallerstein Nina, Avila Magdalena, Belone Lorenda, Lucero Julie, Magarati Maya, Mainer Elana, Martin Diane, Muhammad Michael, Oetzel John, Pearson Cynthia, Sahota Puneet, Simonds Vanessa, Sussman Andrew, Tafoya Greg, Hat Emily White
机构信息
National Indian Child Welfare Association, USA.
出版信息
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Fall;6(3):289-99. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0049.
BACKGROUND
Since 2007, the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) Policy Research Center (PRC) has partnered with the Universities of New Mexico and Washington to study the science of community-based participatory research (CBPR). Our goal is to identify facilitators and barriers to effective community-academic partnerships in American Indian and other communities, which face health disparities.
OBJECTIVES
We have described herein the scientific design of our National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded study (2009-2013) and lessons learned by having a strong community partner leading the research efforts.
METHODS
The research team is implementing a mixed-methods study involving a survey of principal investigators (PIs) and partners across the nation and in-depth case studies of CBPR projects.
RESULTS
We present preliminary findings on methods and measures for community-engaged research and eight lessons learned thus far regarding partnership evaluation, advisory councils, historical trust, research capacity development of community partner, advocacy, honoring each other, messaging, and funding.
CONCLUSIONS
Study methodologies and lessons learned can help community-academic research partnerships translate research in communities.
背景
自2007年以来，美国印第安人全国大会（NCAI）政策研究中心（PRC）与新墨西哥大学和华盛顿大学合作，研究基于社区的参与性研究（CBPR）的科学。我们的目标是确定在美国印第安人和其他面临健康差距的社区中，有效社区 - 学术伙伴关系的促进因素和障碍。
目的
我们在此描述了由美国国立卫生研究院（NIH）资助的研究（2009 - 2013年）的科学设计，以及由强大的社区伙伴主导研究工作所获得的经验教训。
方法
研究团队正在开展一项混合方法研究，包括对全国主要研究者（PI）和合作伙伴的调查以及对CBPR项目的深入案例研究。
结果
我们展示了关于社区参与研究的方法和措施的初步发现，以及迄今为止在伙伴关系评估、咨询委员会、历史信任、社区伙伴的研究能力发展、宣传、相互尊重、信息传递和资金方面获得的八点经验教训。
结论
研究方法和经验教训有助于社区 - 学术研究伙伴关系在社区中转化研究成果。
Zotero 插件