• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Ibuprofen use and clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients.布洛芬在 COVID-19 患者中的应用与临床结局。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Sep;26(9):1259.e5-1259.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
2
The use of ibuprofen to treat fever in COVID-19: A possible indirect association with worse outcome?布洛芬在 COVID-19 中退热的应用:与更差结局的可能间接关联?
Med Hypotheses. 2020 Nov;144:109880. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109880. Epub 2020 May 25.
3
Comparison of intravenous ibuprofen and paracetamol in the treatment of fever: A randomized double-blind study.静脉用布洛芬和对乙酰氨基酚治疗发热的比较:一项随机、双盲研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;46:102-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.02.057. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
4
Combined and alternating paracetamol and ibuprofen therapy for febrile children.对发热儿童采用对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬联合及交替治疗。
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):675-729. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1978.
5
Effectiveness of paracetamol versus ibuprofen administration in febrile children: A systematic literature review.对乙酰氨基酚与布洛芬用于发热儿童的疗效比较:一项系统文献综述
J Paediatr Child Health. 2017 Aug;53(8):800-807. doi: 10.1111/jpc.13507. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
6
Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen overdosage.对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬过量服用。
Pediatr Rev. 2012 Apr;33(4):188-9. doi: 10.1542/pir.33-4-188.
7
Ibuprofen versus paracetamol for treating fever in preschool children in Nigeria: a randomized clinical trial of effectiveness and safety.布洛芬与对乙酰氨基酚治疗尼日利亚学龄前儿童发热的随机临床试验:有效性和安全性。
Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Aug 26;36:350. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2020.36.350.21393. eCollection 2020.
8
[Ibuprofen is more effective than paracetamol in lowering the temperature in febrile children].布洛芬在降低发热儿童体温方面比扑热息痛更有效。
Ugeskr Laeger. 2012 Apr 30;174(18):1214-7.
9
Association of Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen Use With Wheezing in Children With Acute Febrile Illness.对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬的使用与急性发热疾病患儿喘息的关联
Ann Pharmacother. 2017 Mar;51(3):239-244. doi: 10.1177/1060028016678006. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
10
A practical approach to the treatment of low-risk childhood fever.低风险儿童发热治疗的实用方法。
Drugs R D. 2014 Jun;14(2):45-55. doi: 10.1007/s40268-014-0052-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness and safety of Chinese herbal acupoint application in adult patients with fever and mild-to-moderate COVID-19: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.中药穴位贴敷治疗成人发热及轻至中度新型冠状病毒肺炎的有效性和安全性:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验
Front Neurol. 2025 Jun 19;16:1577976. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1577976. eCollection 2025.
2
Intravenously Administered Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Clinical Practice: A Narrative Review.临床实践中静脉注射非甾体抗炎药:一篇叙述性综述
Pharmacy (Basel). 2025 Feb 4;13(1):18. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy13010018.
3
T Cell Peptide Prediction, Immune Response, and Host-Pathogen Relationship in Vaccinated and Recovered from Mild COVID-19 Subjects.T 细胞肽预测、免疫反应以及接种疫苗和从轻度 COVID-19 中康复的受试者中的宿主-病原体关系。
Biomolecules. 2024 Sep 26;14(10):1217. doi: 10.3390/biom14101217.
4
Individual use of self-medication and other remedies in COVID-19 outpatients in Western-Pomerania.西波美拉尼亚地区 COVID-19 门诊患者的自我用药和其他治疗方法的个体使用情况。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 20;14(1):21971. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72440-w.
5
Harnessing immunity: Immunomodulatory therapies in COVID-19.利用免疫:COVID-19中的免疫调节疗法。
World J Virol. 2024 Jun 25;13(2):92521. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v13.i2.92521.
6
The Combination of Gefitinib and Acetaminophen Exacerbates Hepatotoxicity via ROS-Mediated Apoptosis.吉非替尼与对乙酰氨基酚联用通过活性氧介导的细胞凋亡加剧肝毒性。
Biomol Ther (Seoul). 2024 Sep 1;32(5):647-657. doi: 10.4062/biomolther.2023.209. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
7
Role of Inflammation in the Development of COVID-19 to Parkinson's Disease.炎症在新冠病毒病发展为帕金森病过程中的作用
J Inflamm Res. 2024 May 21;17:3259-3282. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S460161. eCollection 2024.
8
Craniofacial Pain Management in Severe COVID-19 Patients During the Pandemic Peak in Kosovo: A Comprehensive Approach.科索沃疫情高峰期重症新冠患者的颅面疼痛管理:一种综合方法
Cureus. 2023 Sep 28;15(9):e46111. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46111. eCollection 2023 Sep.
9
Ibuprofen, other NSAIDs and COVID-19: a narrative review.布洛芬、其他 NSAIDs 和 COVID-19:叙事性综述。
Inflammopharmacology. 2023 Oct;31(5):2147-2159. doi: 10.1007/s10787-023-01309-7. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
10
COVID-19 therapeutics: Clinical application of repurposed drugs and futuristic strategies for target-based drug discovery.新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)治疗方法:旧药新用的临床应用及基于靶点的药物发现的未来策略
Genes Dis. 2023 Jul;10(4):1402-1428. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2022.12.019. Epub 2023 Apr 7.

本文引用的文献

1
EMA advice on the use of NSAIDs for Covid-19.欧洲药品管理局关于非甾体抗炎药用于治疗新冠肺炎的建议。
Drug Ther Bull. 2020 May;58(5):69. doi: 10.1136/dtb.2020.000021. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
2
Structural basis of receptor recognition by SARS-CoV-2.SARS-CoV-2 受体识别的结构基础。
Nature. 2020 May;581(7807):221-224. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2179-y. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
3
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and covid-19.非甾体抗炎药与新冠病毒病
BMJ. 2020 Mar 27;368:m1185. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1185.
4
Covid-19: ibuprofen should not be used for managing symptoms, say doctors and scientists.新冠疫情:医生和科学家称布洛芬不应被用于缓解症状。
BMJ. 2020 Mar 17;368:m1086. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1086.
5
Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID-19 infection?高血压和糖尿病患者感染新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)的风险会增加吗?
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Apr;8(4):e21. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30116-8. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
6
Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: an Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus.新型冠状病毒受体识别:基于 SARS 冠状病毒长达十年结构研究的分析。
J Virol. 2020 Mar 17;94(7). doi: 10.1128/JVI.00127-20.

布洛芬在 COVID-19 患者中的应用与临床结局。

Ibuprofen use and clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

Paediatric Emergency Unit, Shamir (Assaf Harofeh) Medical Centre, Zerifin, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Sep;26(9):1259.e5-1259.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.cmi.2020.06.003
PMID:32535147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7289730/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

It was recently suggested that ibuprofen might increase the risk for severe and fatal coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and should therefore be avoided in this patient population. We aimed to evaluate whether ibuprofen use in individuals with COVID-19 was associated with more severe disease, compared with individuals using paracetamol or no antipyretics.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study of patients with COVID-19 from Shamir Medical Centre, Israel, we monitored any use of ibuprofen from a week before diagnosis of COVID-19 throughout the disease. Primary outcomes were mortality and the need for respiratory support, including oxygen administration and mechanical ventilation.

RESULTS

The study included 403 confirmed cases of COVID-19, with a median age of 45 years. Of the entire cohort, 44 patients (11%) needed respiratory support and 12 (3%) died. One hundred and seventy-nine (44%) patients had fever, with 32% using paracetamol and 22% using ibuprofen, for symptom-relief. In the ibuprofen group, 3 (3.4%) patients died, whereas in the non-ibuprofen group, 9 (2.8%) patients died (p 0.95). Nine (10.3%) patients from the ibuprofen group needed respiratory support, compared with 35 (11%) from the non-ibuprofen group (p 1). When compared with exclusive paracetamol users, no differences were observed in mortality rates or the need for respiratory support among patients using ibuprofen.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of COVID-19 patients, ibuprofen use was not associated with worse clinical outcomes, compared with paracetamol or no antipyretic.

摘要

目的

最近有人提出布洛芬可能会增加患严重和致命 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的风险,因此应避免在该患者人群中使用。我们旨在评估 COVID-19 患者使用布洛芬与使用扑热息痛或不使用任何退烧药相比,是否与更严重的疾病有关。

方法

在以色列沙米尔医疗中心 COVID-19 患者的回顾性队列研究中,我们从 COVID-19 诊断前一周开始监测所有布洛芬的使用情况,并贯穿整个疾病过程。主要结局是死亡率和呼吸支持的需求,包括吸氧和机械通气。

结果

该研究纳入了 403 例确诊的 COVID-19 患者,中位年龄为 45 岁。在整个队列中,44 例(11%)需要呼吸支持,12 例(3%)死亡。179 例(44%)患者有发热症状,其中 32%使用扑热息痛,22%使用布洛芬缓解症状。在布洛芬组中,有 3 例(3.4%)患者死亡,而非布洛芬组中,有 9 例(2.8%)患者死亡(p=0.95)。布洛芬组中有 9 例(10.3%)患者需要呼吸支持,而非布洛芬组中有 35 例(11%)患者需要呼吸支持(p=1)。与单纯使用扑热息痛的患者相比,使用布洛芬的患者死亡率或呼吸支持需求没有差异。

结论

在本队列的 COVID-19 患者中,与使用扑热息痛或不使用任何退烧药相比,布洛芬的使用与较差的临床结局无关。