• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Examining the Impact of Differential Item Functioning on Classification Accuracy in Cognitive Diagnostic Models.检验认知诊断模型中项目功能差异对分类准确性的影响。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2020 Jun;44(4):267-281. doi: 10.1177/0146621619858675. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
2
Examining DIF in the Context of CDMs When the Q-Matrix Is Misspecified.当Q矩阵指定错误时,在认知诊断模型的背景下检验项目功能差异。
Front Psychol. 2018 May 11;9:696. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00696. eCollection 2018.
3
Investigating the Effects of Differential Item Functioning on Proficiency Classification.探究项目功能差异对能力分类的影响。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2018 Jun;42(4):259-274. doi: 10.1177/0146621617726789. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
4
The Interaction of Ability Differences and Guessing When Modeling Differential Item Functioning With the Rasch Model: Conventional and Tailored Calibration.使用拉施模型对项目功能差异进行建模时能力差异与猜测的相互作用:传统校准与定制校准
Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Aug;75(4):610-633. doi: 10.1177/0013164414554082. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
5
Using Odds Ratios to Detect Differential Item Functioning.使用优势比来检测项目功能差异
Appl Psychol Meas. 2018 Nov;42(8):613-629. doi: 10.1177/0146621618762738. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
6
Examining Differential Item Functioning from a Multidimensional IRT Perspective.从多维IRT 视角检验项目区分度
Psychometrika. 2024 Mar;89(1):4-41. doi: 10.1007/s11336-024-09965-6. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
7
Using a Multidimensional IRT Framework to Better Understand Differential Item Functioning (DIF): A Tale of Three DIF Detection Procedures.使用多维项目反应理论框架以更好地理解项目功能差异(DIF):三个DIF检测程序的故事
Educ Psychol Meas. 2017 Dec;77(6):945-970. doi: 10.1177/0013164416657137. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
8
Measurement Equivalence of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Applied Cognition - General Concerns, Short Forms in Ethnically Diverse Groups.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)应用认知量表在不同种族群体中的测量等效性——一般问题及简表
Psychol Test Assess Model. 2016;58(2):255-307.
9
Using a Generalized Logistic Regression Method to Detect Differential Item Functioning With Multiple Groups in Cognitive Diagnostic Tests.使用广义逻辑回归方法检测认知诊断测试中多组的项目差异功能。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2023 Jun;47(4):328-346. doi: 10.1177/01466216231174559. Epub 2023 May 13.
10
Model Similarity, Model Selection, and Attribute Classification.模型相似性、模型选择与属性分类。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2016 May;40(3):200-217. doi: 10.1177/0146621615621717. Epub 2016 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Multiple-Group Cognitive Diagnosis Models.使用多组认知诊断模型检测项目功能差异
Appl Psychol Meas. 2021 Jan;45(1):37-53. doi: 10.1177/0146621620965745. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
2
Studying Individual Differences in Spatial Cognition Through Differential Item Functioning Analysis.通过项目功能差异分析研究空间认知中的个体差异。
Brain Sci. 2020 Oct 24;10(11):774. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10110774.

本文引用的文献

1
After Differential Item Functioning Is Detected: IRT Item Calibration and Scoring in the Presence of DIF.在检测到项目功能差异之后:存在项目功能差异时的项目反应理论项目校准与计分
Appl Psychol Meas. 2016 Nov;40(8):573-591. doi: 10.1177/0146621616664304. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
2
Examining DIF in the Context of CDMs When the Q-Matrix Is Misspecified.当Q矩阵指定错误时,在认知诊断模型的背景下检验项目功能差异。
Front Psychol. 2018 May 11;9:696. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00696. eCollection 2018.
3
The Impact of Q-Matrix Designs on Diagnostic Classification Accuracy in the Presence of Attribute Hierarchies.属性层次结构存在时Q矩阵设计对诊断分类准确性的影响
Educ Psychol Meas. 2017 Apr;77(2):220-240. doi: 10.1177/0013164416645636. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
4
The Sufficient and Necessary Condition for the Identifiability and Estimability of the DINA Model.DINA 模型可识别性和可估计性的充分必要条件。
Psychometrika. 2019 Jun;84(2):468-483. doi: 10.1007/s11336-018-9619-8. Epub 2018 May 4.
5
Identifiability of Diagnostic Classification Models.诊断分类模型的可识别性。
Psychometrika. 2016 Sep;81(3):625-49. doi: 10.1007/s11336-015-9471-z. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
6
Hierarchical diagnostic classification models: a family of models for estimating and testing attribute hierarchies.分层诊断分类模型:用于估计和检验属性层次结构的一类模型。
Psychometrika. 2014 Apr;79(2):317-39. doi: 10.1007/s11336-013-9362-0. Epub 2014 Jan 30.

检验认知诊断模型中项目功能差异对分类准确性的影响。

Examining the Impact of Differential Item Functioning on Classification Accuracy in Cognitive Diagnostic Models.

作者信息

Paulsen Justin, Svetina Dubravka, Feng Yanan, Valdivia Montserrat

机构信息

Indiana University, Bloomington, USA.

出版信息

Appl Psychol Meas. 2020 Jun;44(4):267-281. doi: 10.1177/0146621619858675. Epub 2019 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1177/0146621619858675
PMID:32536729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7262994/
Abstract

Cognitive diagnostic models (CDMs) are of growing interest in educational research because of the models' ability to provide diagnostic information regarding examinees' strengths and weaknesses suited to a variety of content areas. An important step to ensure appropriate uses and interpretations from CDMs is to understand the impact of differential item functioning (DIF). While methods of detecting DIF in CDMs have been identified, there is a limited understanding of the extent to which DIF affects classification accuracy. This simulation study provides a reference to practitioners to understand how different magnitudes and types of DIF interact with CDM item types and group distributions and sample sizes to influence attribute- and profile-level classification accuracy. The results suggest that attribute-level classification accuracy is robust to DIF of large magnitudes in most conditions, while profile-level classification accuracy is negatively influenced by the inclusion of DIF. Conditions of unequal group distributions and DIF located on simple structure items had the greatest effect in decreasing classification accuracy. The article closes by considering implications of the results and future directions.

摘要

认知诊断模型(CDMs)在教育研究中越来越受到关注,因为这些模型能够提供有关考生优势和劣势的诊断信息,适用于各种内容领域。确保对认知诊断模型进行适当使用和解释的重要一步是了解项目功能差异(DIF)的影响。虽然已经确定了在认知诊断模型中检测项目功能差异的方法,但对于项目功能差异在多大程度上影响分类准确性的理解仍然有限。这项模拟研究为从业者提供了一个参考,以了解不同程度和类型的项目功能差异如何与认知诊断模型的项目类型、群体分布和样本大小相互作用,从而影响属性和配置文件级别的分类准确性。结果表明,在大多数情况下,属性级别的分类准确性对大程度的项目功能差异具有鲁棒性,而配置文件级别的分类准确性则受到项目功能差异的负面影响。群体分布不平等和位于简单结构项目上的项目功能差异条件对降低分类准确性的影响最大。文章最后考虑了研究结果的意义和未来方向。