Brown-Forestiere Ricki, Furiato Anthony, Foresteire Nikolas P, Kashani John S, Waheed Abdul
Emergency Medicine, Brandon Regional Hospital/Hospital Corporation of America (HCA)-University of South Florida (USF) Consortium, Brandon, USA.
Emergency Medicine, Brandon Regional Hospital, Brandon, USA.
Cureus. 2020 May 11;12(5):e8051. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8051.
Introduction In the United States (US), appendicitis is the most common acute abdominal emergency requiring surgery. Patients with appendicitis continue to display a complex and atypical range of clinical manifestations, providing a subsequent high risk for emergency physicians to miss acute abdominal pathology on a patient's initial visits. Due to the risk of potential perforation, the proper and timely clinical identification of acute appendicitis is vital. The current study aims to identify clinical characteristics that could be useful in identifying patients at risk for having acute appendicitis that was misdiagnosed on their initial visits. Methods Medical charts consisting of patients between the ages of 19 and 55 years on their second visit were flagged and reviewed by the emergency department quality assurance (EDQA) committee. The retrospective chart review included patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with the chief complaint of an abdominal-related complaint, were discharged, returned within 72 hours, and were diagnosed with a pathologically confirmed appendicitis. All patients were managed operatively, with pathology results reviewed for evidence of acute appendicitis. Those with confirmed pathologic appendicitis upon return were considered to have a "misdiagnosis." Any patients managed nonoperatively and those with negative pathology were excluded from the study and considered not to have appendicitis. Results Fifty-five patients were identified through the EDQA committee from May 2011 to January 2014. After exclusion criteria were applied, 18 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study (7 males, 11 females). The mean age was 36.2 (range: 19-55). The most common presenting complaint on the initial visit was pain in the epigastric region of the abdomen (50%, n = 9). Twenty-two percent (n = 4) of patients had pain in the right lower quadrant documented in the physician's note on the initial visit and 83% (n = 15) had right lower quadrant pain documented on the second visit. Two patients (11%) did not have right lower quadrant tenderness on either visit. The most common discharge diagnosis on the initial visit was undifferentiated abdominal pain (50%), followed by gastritis (28%). Opioid pain medication was administered or prescribed to 39% (n = 7) of the patients. The average return time was 23.9 hours. Conclusion The administration of opioid pain medication is associated with many of the return visits to the emergency department for missed appendicitis. Finally, discharge diagnosis and planning are imperative, as detailed early appendicitis instructions or extended ED observation can include more cases and decrease litigation risk.
引言
在美国,阑尾炎是最常见的需要手术治疗的急性腹部急症。阑尾炎患者的临床表现仍然复杂且不典型,这使得急诊医生在患者初次就诊时漏诊急性腹部病变的风险很高。由于存在潜在穿孔的风险,正确及时地临床诊断急性阑尾炎至关重要。本研究旨在确定有助于识别初次就诊时被误诊为急性阑尾炎风险患者的临床特征。
方法
由急诊科质量保证(EDQA)委员会标记并审查19至55岁患者第二次就诊时的病历。回顾性病历审查包括以腹部相关主诉到急诊科就诊、出院、在72小时内复诊且经病理确诊为阑尾炎的患者。所有患者均接受手术治疗,并审查病理结果以寻找急性阑尾炎的证据。复诊时确诊为病理性阑尾炎的患者被视为“误诊”。所有接受非手术治疗的患者以及病理结果为阴性的患者均被排除在研究之外,并被认为没有阑尾炎。
结果
2011年5月至2014年1月期间,EDQA委员会共识别出55例患者。应用排除标准后,18例患者符合本研究的纳入标准(7例男性,11例女性)。平均年龄为36.2岁(范围:19 - 55岁)。初次就诊时最常见的主诉是上腹部疼痛(50%,n = 9)。22%(n = 4)的患者在初次就诊时医生记录中有右下腹疼痛,83%(n = 15)的患者在第二次就诊时有右下腹疼痛记录。两名患者(11%)在两次就诊时均无右下腹压痛。初次就诊时最常见的出院诊断是未分化腹痛(50%),其次是胃炎(28%)。39%(n = 7)的患者接受了阿片类止痛药物治疗或处方。平均复诊时间为23.9小时。
结论
阿片类止痛药物的使用与许多因漏诊阑尾炎而返回急诊科复诊的情况有关。最后,出院诊断和规划至关重要,因为详细的早期阑尾炎指导或延长的急诊科观察可以涵盖更多病例并降低诉讼风险。