Pitman Katrina A, Carins Julia, Rundle-Thiele Sharyn, Vincze Lisa
Griffith Business School, Department of Marketing, Social Marketing @ Griffith, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
School of Health Science and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Health Promot J Austr. 2025 Jul;36(3):e70039. doi: 10.1002/hpja.70039.
Social influence has been recognised as a primary determinant of eating behaviour, and an effective behavioural change mechanism. Institutional settings offer a conducive environment for eating behaviour research, and few have examined multiple social influences interacting within an Australian institutional eating setting. Responding to calls to improve the use and reporting of theory within social marketing research, this study aimed to explore which social influences within the Consumer Socialisation Theory (CST) were evident in an institutional eating environment, to determine if the use of the CST could advance theory use within social marketing and behavioural change research.
Semi-structured interviews (n = 16) were conducted with students residing in university college accommodation with provided meals. A deductive content analysis method was used to identify the CST social influences of interaction, modelling, social norms and reinforcement.
All theory defined social influences were evident. While all four social influences were present, participants identified interaction, modelling and social norms as having a greater influence within this context. The CST was successfully applied and helped to identify the different social influences within this study.
These findings show that not all social influences were relevant within this setting. SO WHAT?: This study informs future research and interventions by indicating the social influences that exist within an Australian university institutional context, and therefore which may be used to change eating behaviour. Additionally, it provides evidence for the successful use of the CST as a theory to identify social influences and inform intervention development and planning.
社会影响已被公认为饮食行为的主要决定因素,也是一种有效的行为改变机制。机构环境为饮食行为研究提供了有利条件,但很少有人研究澳大利亚机构饮食环境中多种社会影响因素之间的相互作用。为响应社会营销研究中关于改进理论运用和报告的呼吁,本研究旨在探讨消费者社会化理论(CST)中的哪些社会影响因素在机构饮食环境中较为明显,以确定CST的运用是否能推动社会营销和行为改变研究中理论的运用。
对居住在提供餐饮的大学学院宿舍的学生进行了半结构化访谈(n = 16)。采用演绎式内容分析法来确定CST中互动、模仿、社会规范和强化等社会影响因素。
所有理论定义的社会影响因素都很明显。虽然所有四种社会影响因素都存在,但参与者认为互动、模仿和社会规范在这种背景下影响更大。CST得到了成功应用,并有助于识别本研究中的不同社会影响因素。
这些发现表明并非所有社会影响因素在这种环境中都具有相关性。那又如何?:本研究通过指出澳大利亚大学机构环境中存在的社会影响因素,为未来的研究和干预提供了参考,因此这些因素可用于改变饮食行为。此外,它为成功运用CST作为一种理论来识别社会影响因素并为干预发展和规划提供信息提供了证据。