• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Delayed Modified ICH Score Outperforms Baseline Scoring in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage.延迟修正的脑出血评分在急性脑出血中优于基线评分。
Neurohospitalist. 2020 Jul;10(3):217-220. doi: 10.1177/1941874419896715. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
2
Predicting long-term outcomes in acute intracerebral haemorrhage using delayed prognostication scores.使用延迟预后评分预测急性脑出血的长期预后
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2021 Dec;6(4):536-541. doi: 10.1136/svn-2020-000656. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
3
Calculation of Prognostic Scores, Using Delayed Imaging, Outperforms Baseline Assessments in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage.延迟成像预测评分优于急性脑出血的基线评估。
Stroke. 2020 Apr;51(4):1107-1110. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027119. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
4
A new Modified Intracerebral Hemorrhage score for treatment decisions in basal ganglia hemorrhage--a randomized trial.一种用于基底节区脑出血治疗决策的新型改良脑出血评分——一项随机试验。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jul;36(7):2151-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318173fc99.
5
Modified ICH score was superior to original ICH score for assessment of 30-day mortality and good outcome of non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage.改良 ICH 评分优于原始 ICH 评分,用于评估非创伤性脑内出血 30 天死亡率和良好结局。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Oct;209:106913. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106913. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
6
The prediction of 30-day mortality and functional outcome in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage with secondary ventricular hemorrhage: a score comparison.自发性脑出血伴继发性脑室出血30天死亡率和功能转归的预测:评分比较
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2011;112:9-11. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-0661-7_2.
7
Lack of Early Improvement Predicts Poor Outcome Following Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage.缺乏早期改善预示着急性脑出血后预后不良。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;46(4):e310-e317. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002962.
8
Transsylvian-transinsular approach for the removal of basal ganglia hemorrhage under a Modified Intracerebral Hemorrhage score.改良脑出血评分下经侧裂-经岛叶入路清除基底节区脑出血
J Craniofac Surg. 2013 Jul;24(4):1388-92. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318292c302.
9
Retrospective study of long-term outcome after brain arteriovenous malformation rupture: the RAP score.脑动静脉畸形破裂后长期转归的回顾性研究:RAP 评分。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;128(1):78-85. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.JNS161431. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
10
The max-intracerebral hemorrhage score predicts long-term outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage.最大脑内出血评分预测脑内出血的长期预后。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2018 Dec;24(12):1149-1155. doi: 10.1111/cns.12846. Epub 2018 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep learning survival model predicts outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage from initial CT scan.深度学习生存模型可根据脑出血初始CT扫描结果预测预后。
Eur Stroke J. 2025 Mar;10(1):225-235. doi: 10.1177/23969873241260154. Epub 2024 Jun 16.
2
Predicting long-term outcomes in acute intracerebral haemorrhage using delayed prognostication scores.使用延迟预后评分预测急性脑出血的长期预后
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2021 Dec;6(4):536-541. doi: 10.1136/svn-2020-000656. Epub 2021 Mar 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting Intracerebral Hemorrhage Expansion With Noncontrast Computed Tomography: The BAT Score.基于非增强 CT 的脑出血扩大预测:BAT 评分。
Stroke. 2018 May;49(5):1163-1169. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020138. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
2
Severity assessment in maximally treated ICH patients: The max-ICH score.最大程度治疗的 ICH 患者的严重程度评估:max-ICH 评分。
Neurology. 2017 Aug 1;89(5):423-431. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004174. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
3
24-Hour ICH Score Is a Better Predictor of Outcome than Admission ICH Score.24小时脑出血评分比入院时脑出血评分更能准确预测预后。
ISRN Stroke. 2013;2013. doi: 10.1155/2013/605286.
4
Intracerebral Hemorrhage Location and Functional Outcomes of Patients: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.脑出血患者的出血部位与功能结局:一项系统文献综述与荟萃分析
Neurocrit Care. 2016 Dec;25(3):384-391. doi: 10.1007/s12028-016-0276-4.
5
Guidelines for the Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.自发性脑出血管理指南:美国心脏协会/美国中风协会医疗保健专业人员指南。
Stroke. 2015 Jul;46(7):2032-60. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000069. Epub 2015 May 28.
6
Update in intracerebral hemorrhage.脑出血的最新进展。
Neurohospitalist. 2011 Jul;1(3):148-59. doi: 10.1177/1941875211409050.
7
Development, expansion, and use of a stroke clinical trials resource for novel exploratory analyses.开发、扩展和利用中风临床试验资源进行新的探索性分析。
Int J Stroke. 2012 Feb;7(2):133-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2011.00735.x.
8
Defining hematoma expansion in intracerebral hemorrhage: relationship with patient outcomes.定义脑出血中的血肿扩大:与患者预后的关系。
Neurology. 2011 Apr 5;76(14):1238-44. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182143317. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
9
Prediction of functional outcome in patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage: the FUNC score.原发性脑出血患者功能预后的预测:FUNC评分
Stroke. 2008 Aug;39(8):2304-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.512202. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
10
A new Modified Intracerebral Hemorrhage score for treatment decisions in basal ganglia hemorrhage--a randomized trial.一种用于基底节区脑出血治疗决策的新型改良脑出血评分——一项随机试验。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jul;36(7):2151-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318173fc99.

延迟修正的脑出血评分在急性脑出血中优于基线评分。

A Delayed Modified ICH Score Outperforms Baseline Scoring in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

作者信息

Lun Ronda, Yogendrakumar Vignan, Blacquiere Dylan, Shamy Michel, Stotts Grant, Dowlatshahi Dar

机构信息

Ottawa Stroke Program, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Neurohospitalist. 2020 Jul;10(3):217-220. doi: 10.1177/1941874419896715. Epub 2019 Dec 30.

DOI:10.1177/1941874419896715
PMID:32549946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7271617/
Abstract

The Modified Intracerebral Hemorrhage (MICH) score is a simple tool created to provide prognostication in basal ganglia hemorrhages. Current prognostic scores, including the MICH, are based on the assessment of baseline patient characteristics, failing to account for significant developments, such as intraventricular extension and clinical deterioration, which may occur over the first 72 hours. We propose to validate the MICH in all hemorrhage locations and hypothesize that its calculation at 72 hours will outperform its baseline counterpart with respect to predicting mortality and functional outcome. We performed a retrospective analysis of collated data from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive database. Primary outcome was 90-day mortality. Secondary outcome was poor outcome (modified Rankin Scale 4-6) at 90 days. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated looking at the predictive ability of the MICH score for mortality and poor outcome, at baseline and at 72 hours. Competing curves were assessed with nonparametric methods. A total of 226 patients were included, with a 90-day mortality of 22.5%. The MICH scores calculated at 72 hours were more predictive of mortality than at baseline (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.89 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-0.94] vs 0.78 [95% CI: 0.70-0.85]), < .01. The MICH scores at 72 hours similarly better predicted functional outcome (AUC: 0.78 [95% CI: 0.72-0.84] vs AUC: 0.72 [95% CI: 0.66-0.78]), = .047. The MICH score has positive prognostic value for mortality and poor functional outcome in all hemorrhage locations. Delaying its calculation resulted in higher predictive values for both and suggests that delaying discussions around withdrawal of care may result in more accurate prognostication in acute intracerebral hemorrhage.

摘要

改良脑出血(MICH)评分是一种用于基底节区脑出血预后评估的简单工具。目前包括MICH在内的预后评分是基于对患者基线特征的评估,未能考虑到最初72小时内可能出现的重大进展,如脑室扩展和临床恶化。我们建议在所有出血部位验证MICH评分,并假设在72小时时计算该评分在预测死亡率和功能结局方面将优于其基线对应值。我们对虚拟国际卒中试验存档数据库中的整理数据进行了回顾性分析。主要结局是90天死亡率。次要结局是90天时不良结局(改良Rankin量表4 - 6级)。绘制了受试者工作特征曲线,以观察MICH评分在基线和72小时时对死亡率和不良结局的预测能力。使用非参数方法评估竞争曲线。共纳入226例患者,90天死亡率为22.5%。72小时时计算的MICH评分比基线时更能预测死亡率(曲线下面积[AUC]:0.89[95%置信区间[CI]:0.83 - 0.94]对0.78[95%CI:0.70 - 0.85]),P <.01。72小时时的MICH评分同样能更好地预测功能结局(AUC:0.78[95%CI:0.72 - 0.84]对AUC:0.72[95%CI:0.66 - 0.78]),P =.047。MICH评分对所有出血部位的死亡率和不良功能结局具有阳性预后价值。延迟计算该评分会使两者的预测值更高,这表明在急性脑出血中延迟关于撤除治疗的讨论可能会导致更准确的预后评估。