Lun Ronda, Yogendrakumar Vignan, Blacquiere Dylan, Shamy Michel, Stotts Grant, Dowlatshahi Dar
Ottawa Stroke Program, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Neurohospitalist. 2020 Jul;10(3):217-220. doi: 10.1177/1941874419896715. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
The Modified Intracerebral Hemorrhage (MICH) score is a simple tool created to provide prognostication in basal ganglia hemorrhages. Current prognostic scores, including the MICH, are based on the assessment of baseline patient characteristics, failing to account for significant developments, such as intraventricular extension and clinical deterioration, which may occur over the first 72 hours. We propose to validate the MICH in all hemorrhage locations and hypothesize that its calculation at 72 hours will outperform its baseline counterpart with respect to predicting mortality and functional outcome. We performed a retrospective analysis of collated data from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive database. Primary outcome was 90-day mortality. Secondary outcome was poor outcome (modified Rankin Scale 4-6) at 90 days. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated looking at the predictive ability of the MICH score for mortality and poor outcome, at baseline and at 72 hours. Competing curves were assessed with nonparametric methods. A total of 226 patients were included, with a 90-day mortality of 22.5%. The MICH scores calculated at 72 hours were more predictive of mortality than at baseline (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.89 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-0.94] vs 0.78 [95% CI: 0.70-0.85]), < .01. The MICH scores at 72 hours similarly better predicted functional outcome (AUC: 0.78 [95% CI: 0.72-0.84] vs AUC: 0.72 [95% CI: 0.66-0.78]), = .047. The MICH score has positive prognostic value for mortality and poor functional outcome in all hemorrhage locations. Delaying its calculation resulted in higher predictive values for both and suggests that delaying discussions around withdrawal of care may result in more accurate prognostication in acute intracerebral hemorrhage.
改良脑出血(MICH)评分是一种用于基底节区脑出血预后评估的简单工具。目前包括MICH在内的预后评分是基于对患者基线特征的评估,未能考虑到最初72小时内可能出现的重大进展,如脑室扩展和临床恶化。我们建议在所有出血部位验证MICH评分,并假设在72小时时计算该评分在预测死亡率和功能结局方面将优于其基线对应值。我们对虚拟国际卒中试验存档数据库中的整理数据进行了回顾性分析。主要结局是90天死亡率。次要结局是90天时不良结局(改良Rankin量表4 - 6级)。绘制了受试者工作特征曲线,以观察MICH评分在基线和72小时时对死亡率和不良结局的预测能力。使用非参数方法评估竞争曲线。共纳入226例患者,90天死亡率为22.5%。72小时时计算的MICH评分比基线时更能预测死亡率(曲线下面积[AUC]:0.89[95%置信区间[CI]:0.83 - 0.94]对0.78[95%CI:0.70 - 0.85]),P <.01。72小时时的MICH评分同样能更好地预测功能结局(AUC:0.78[95%CI:0.72 - 0.84]对AUC:0.72[95%CI:0.66 - 0.78]),P =.047。MICH评分对所有出血部位的死亡率和不良功能结局具有阳性预后价值。延迟计算该评分会使两者的预测值更高,这表明在急性脑出血中延迟关于撤除治疗的讨论可能会导致更准确的预后评估。