Jafary M R, Amini M R, Sanjari M, Aalaa M, Goudarzi Z, Najafpour Zh, Mohajeri Tehrani M R
Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Diabetes Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2020 May 12;19(1):445-452. doi: 10.1007/s40200-020-00527-y. eCollection 2020 Jun.
Providing health care to patients at home could be causing the mortality and readmission rates reduction in addition to satisfaction of both patients and health care providers increase. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of home care service compared to hospital based care in patients with diabetic foot ulcer.
An economic evaluation study and a trial study were simultaneously conducted in Iran. In trial phase, patients with diabetic foot ulcer were randomly assigned to the home care or hospital care. The Cost and Quality of life data were determined as measures of the study. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated for comparative purposes. The model consisted of five stages of the disease. The Tree Age Pro 2009 and R software's were used for data analysis.
120 patients were enrolled in our trial; among which 30 patients were in home care service group and 90 patients in hospital based care group. The rate of ulcer size reduction in hospital based care was significant ( value = 0.003) in comparison with home care service. The total cost of the home care and hospital strategies were 1720.4 US$, 3940.3 US$ and the total effectiveness were 0.31 and 0.29, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was 117,300 US$ per quality-adjusted life year for home care intervention compared to hospital based care. Based on ICER plane home care treatment will be placed on the southeastern quadrant of the Cost-Effectiveness Plane, and is suggested as a more dominant treatment alternative.
Regarding current evidence, home care strategy for patients suffering diabetic foot ulcer enjoys more cost effectiveness compared to hospital care. It is suggested that healthcare policy makers determine the tariff for health care services for disease groups according to the activity based costing approach.
在家为患者提供医疗服务除了能降低死亡率和再入院率外,还能提高患者和医疗服务提供者双方的满意度。本研究的目的是评估与医院护理相比,家庭护理服务对糖尿病足溃疡患者的成本效益。
在伊朗同时进行了一项经济评估研究和一项试验研究。在试验阶段,将糖尿病足溃疡患者随机分配到家庭护理组或医院护理组。确定成本和生活质量数据作为研究指标。为了进行比较,计算了增量成本效益比。该模型由疾病的五个阶段组成。使用Tree Age Pro 2009和R软件进行数据分析。
120名患者参与了我们的试验;其中30名患者在家庭护理服务组,90名患者在医院护理组。与家庭护理服务相比,医院护理组溃疡面积缩小率显著(值=0.003)。家庭护理和医院护理策略的总成本分别为1720.4美元、3940.3美元,总效益分别为0.31和0.29。与医院护理相比,家庭护理干预的增量成本效益比(ICER)为每质量调整生命年117,300美元。基于ICER平面,家庭护理治疗将位于成本效益平面的东南象限,被建议作为更具优势的治疗选择。
根据现有证据,糖尿病足溃疡患者的家庭护理策略比医院护理更具成本效益。建议医疗政策制定者根据作业成本法确定疾病组医疗服务的收费标准。