Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation, Sacred Heart Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
Department of Pathology, IRCCS A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation, Sacred Heart Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
J Neurosurg Sci. 2023 Feb;67(1):103-107. doi: 10.23736/S0390-5616.20.04943-7. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
Failure of clinical trials with targeted therapies in glioblastoma (GBM) is probably related to the enrollment of molecularly unselected patients. In this study we report the results of a precision medicine protocol in recurrent GBM.
We prospectively evaluated 34 patients with recurrent GBM. We determined the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFRvIII), and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN). According to the molecular pattern we administered bevacizumab alone in patients with VEGF overexpression, absence of EGFRvIII, and normal PTEN (group A; N.=16); bevacizumab + erlotinib in patients with VEGF overexpression, expression of EGFRvIII, and normal PTEN (group B; N.=14); and bevacizumab + sirolimus in patients with VEGF overexpression and loss of PTEN, irrespective of the EGFRvIII status (group C; N.=4). We evaluated the response rate, the clinical benefit rate, the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS-6), the 12-month PFS (PFS-12) and the safety profile of the treatment. Moreover, we compared our results with the ones of EORTC 26101 trial.
Response rate was 50% in the whole cohort with the highest rate in group C (75%). Clinical benefit rate was 71% with the highest rate in group C (75%). PFS-6 was 56% in the whole cohort with the highest rate in group B (64%). PFS-12 was 21% in the whole cohort with the highest rate in group B (29%). When comparing our results with those from the combination arm of the EORTC 26101 trial we found a significantly higher PFS-6 and PFS-12 in our cohort.
The precision medicine protocol for recurrent GBM is feasible and leads to improved results if compared with studies lacking molecular selection.
针对胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)的靶向治疗临床试验的失败可能与未对患者进行分子选择有关。在这项研究中,我们报告了复发性 GBM 精准医学方案的结果。
我们前瞻性评估了 34 例复发性 GBM 患者。我们测定了血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、表皮生长因子受体变异 III(EGFRvIII)和磷酸酶和张力蛋白同源物(PTEN)的表达。根据分子模式,我们对 VEGF 过表达、EGFRvIII 缺失和正常 PTEN 的患者单独使用贝伐珠单抗(组 A;N.=16);对 VEGF 过表达、表达 EGFRvIII 和正常 PTEN 的患者使用贝伐珠单抗+厄洛替尼(组 B;N.=14);对 VEGF 过表达且 PTEN 缺失的患者使用贝伐珠单抗+西罗莫司,无论 EGFRvIII 状态如何(组 C;N.=4)。我们评估了治疗的反应率、临床获益率、6 个月无进展生存期(PFS-6)、12 个月 PFS(PFS-12)和安全性特征。此外,我们将我们的结果与 EORTC 26101 试验的结果进行了比较。
整个队列的反应率为 50%,其中组 C 的反应率最高(75%)。整个队列的临床获益率为 71%,其中组 C 的临床获益率最高(75%)。整个队列的 PFS-6 为 56%,其中组 B 的 PFS-6 最高(64%)。整个队列的 PFS-12 为 21%,其中组 B 的 PFS-12 最高(29%)。将我们的结果与 EORTC 26101 试验联合组的结果进行比较,我们发现我们的队列的 PFS-6 和 PFS-12 显著提高。
与缺乏分子选择的研究相比,针对复发性 GBM 的精准医学方案是可行的,并可带来更好的结果。