Kant Ravi, Dubey Prakash K, Ranjan Alok
Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India.
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2020 Jun;48(3):196-201. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2019.79477. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
5-HT3 receptor antagonists are known to possess local anesthetic properties and are commonly used for the alleviation of pain following propofol injection. Palonosetron, a newer molecule, has shown contradictory results for this property. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of palonosetron pretreatment in alleviating propofol injection pain with that of lignocaine. Their comparative effect on various hemodynamic parameters was also evaluated.
A total of 100 adult patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group L received lignocaine 40 mg in 5 mL of 0.9% saline pretreatment solution and group P received 0.075 mg palonosetron in 5 mL 0.9% of saline pretreatment solution. After 2 minutes, the tourniquet was released and one-fourth of the total calculated dose of propofol was administered, after which the pain assessment was made. The Students t-test was used for comparing the difference of mean between the two groups after testing for equality of variance using F-statistics. Categorical variables were expressed as a percentage, and the Chi-square test was performed to assess the independence of attributes. Repeated-measure analysis of variance was used to compare the change in heart rate and mean arterial pressure over three time points between the two groups.
The proportion of pain reported by the subjects in the lignocaine group was significantly lower as compared to the subjects in the palonosetron group (p=0.001). No significant difference of mean heart rate and mean arterial pressure was observed between the two groups following these interventions.
The efficacy of palonosetron in alleviating the pain on injection of propofol was significantly less than that of lignocaine.
5-羟色胺3(5-HT3)受体拮抗剂具有局部麻醉特性,常用于减轻丙泊酚注射后的疼痛。帕洛诺司琼作为一种较新的药物,在这一特性上显示出相互矛盾的结果。本研究旨在比较帕洛诺司琼预处理减轻丙泊酚注射疼痛的效果与利多卡因的效果。还评估了它们对各种血流动力学参数的比较作用。
总共100名成年患者被随机分为两组之一:L组接受5mL 0.9%盐水预处理溶液中40mg利多卡因,P组接受5mL 0.9%盐水预处理溶液中0.075mg帕洛诺司琼。2分钟后,松开止血带,给予计算出的丙泊酚总剂量的四分之一,之后进行疼痛评估。在使用F统计量检验方差齐性后,用学生t检验比较两组之间的平均差异。分类变量以百分比表示,并进行卡方检验以评估属性的独立性。采用重复测量方差分析比较两组在三个时间点的心率和平均动脉压变化。
与帕洛诺司琼组的受试者相比,利多卡因组受试者报告的疼痛比例显著更低(p=0.001)。这些干预后,两组之间未观察到平均心率和平均动脉压的显著差异。
帕洛诺司琼减轻丙泊酚注射疼痛的疗效显著低于利多卡因。