Suppr超能文献

致命撞车事故中的超速和酒驾——深入调查结果

Speeding and impaired driving in fatal crashes-Results from in-depth investigations.

作者信息

Høye Alena

机构信息

Department of Safety, Security, and Behavior, Institute of Transport Economics, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2020;21(7):425-430. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1775822. Epub 2020 Jun 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to identify typical patterns of risk factors among speeding and impaired drivers involved in fatal crashes and to suggest countermeasures.

METHOD

Results from in-depth investigations of 1,501 fatal passenger car crashes that occurred in Norway from 2005 to 2015 and involved 1,949 passenger cars are summarized. Relationships between speeding (excessive speed, EXC, or inappropriate speed, INAP); driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol (ALC), drugs (DRUG), or both (MIX); and other driver-, crash-, vehicle-, and road-related variables were investigated.

RESULTS

Speeding and DUI drivers have in common that they are more often male, unbelted, unlicensed, driving old cars, and involved in single-vehicle crashes under low-volume conditions (nighttime, weekend, low-volume roads). They are also less often fatigued, ill, or suicidal. EXC and ALC drivers are on average younger and they generally show more high-risk behavior than INAP, DRUG, and MIX drivers. In crashes with pedestrians/cyclists and crashes on slippery roads or in winter, INAP drivers are overrepresented and EXC and DUI drivers are underrepresented. Among DRUG and MIX drivers there may be differences according to the type of substance.

CONCLUSIONS

Those drivers who show most types of high-risk behaviors, especially EXC and ALC drivers, are less likely to respond to measures relying on voluntary behavior changes, such as recommended speed, speed warnings, or classical enforcement, although such measures may be effective for INAP and some DRUG drivers. To change the behavior of EXC and ALC drivers, more restrictive measures are called for, such as non-overridable intelligent speed adaptation, vehicle impoundment, or Alcolock.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定涉及致命撞车事故的超速和受损驾驶员的典型风险因素模式,并提出应对措施。

方法

总结了对2005年至2015年发生在挪威的1501起致命乘用车撞车事故的深入调查结果,这些事故涉及1949辆乘用车。研究了超速(超速、EXC,或不适当速度、INAP);在酒精(ALC)、药物(DRUG)或两者(MIX)影响下驾驶(DUI);以及其他与驾驶员、撞车、车辆和道路相关的变量之间的关系。

结果

超速和酒驾驾驶员的共同之处在于,他们更常为男性、未系安全带、无驾照、驾驶旧车,并且在低流量条件下(夜间、周末、低流量道路)发生单车撞车事故。他们也较少出现疲劳、生病或自杀情况。EXC和ALC驾驶员平均年龄更小,并且他们通常比INAP、DRUG和MIX驾驶员表现出更多的高风险行为。在与行人/骑自行车者的撞车事故以及在湿滑道路或冬季的撞车事故中,INAP驾驶员占比过高,而EXC和酒驾驾驶员占比过低。在DRUG和MIX驾驶员中,可能因物质类型存在差异。

结论

那些表现出大多数类型高风险行为的驾驶员,尤其是EXC和ALC驾驶员,不太可能对依赖自愿行为改变的措施做出反应,如推荐速度、速度警告或传统执法,尽管这些措施可能对INAP和一些DRUG驾驶员有效。为改变EXC和ALC驾驶员的行为,需要更严格的措施,如不可 override 的智能速度适配、车辆扣押或酒精锁。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验