Fell James C, Waehrer Geetha, Voas Robert B, Auld-Owens Amy, Carr Katie, Pell Karen
Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE), 11720 Beltsville Drive, Suite 900, Calverton, MD 20705-3111, USA.
Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE), 11720 Beltsville Drive, Suite 900, Calverton, MD 20705-3111, USA.
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Dec;73:181-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
Research measuring levels of enforcement has investigated whether increases in police activities (e.g., checkpoints, driving-while-intoxicated [DWI] special patrols) above some baseline level are associated with reduced crashes and fatalities. Little research, however, has attempted to quantitatively measure enforcement efforts and relate different enforcement levels to specific levels of the prevalence of alcohol-impaired driving.
The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of law-enforcement intensity in a sample of communities on the rate of crashes involving a drinking driver. We analyzed the influence of different enforcement strategies and measures: (1) specific deterrence - annual number of driving-under-the-influence (DUI) arrests per capita; (2) general deterrence - frequency of sobriety checkpoint operations; (3) highly visible traffic enforcement - annual number of traffic stops per capita; (4) enforcement presence - number of sworn officers per capita; and (5) overall traffic enforcement - the number of other traffic enforcement citations per capita (i.e., seat belt citations, speeding tickets, and other moving violations and warnings) in each community.
We took advantage of nationwide data on the local prevalence of impaired driving from the 2007 National Roadside Survey (NRS), measures of DUI enforcement activity provided by the police departments that participated in the 2007 NRS, and crashes from the General Estimates System (GES) in the same locations as the 2007 NRS. We analyzed the relationship between the intensity of enforcement and the prevalence of impaired driving crashes in 22-26 communities with complete data. Log-linear regressions were used throughout the study.
A higher number of DUI arrests per 10,000 driving-aged population was associated with a lower ratio of drinking-driver crashes to non-drinking-driver crashes (p=0.035) when controlling for the percentage of legally intoxicated drivers on the roads surveyed in the community from the 2007 NRS. Results indicate that a 10% increase in the DUI arrest rate is associated with a 1% reduction in the drinking driver crash rate. Similar results were obtained for an increase in the number of sworn officers per 10,000 driving-age population.
While a higher DUI arrest rate was associated with a lower drinking-driver crash rate, sobriety checkpoints did not have a significant relationship to drinking-driver crashes. This appeared to be due to the fact that only 3% of the on-the-road drivers were exposed to frequent sobriety checkpoints (only 1 of 36 police agencies where we received enforcement data conducted checkpoints weekly). This low-use strategy is symptomatic of the general decline in checkpoint use in the U.S. since the 1980s and 1990s when the greatest declines in alcohol-impaired-driving fatal crashes occurred. The overall findings in this study may help law enforcement agencies around the country adjust their traffic enforcement intensity in order to reduce impaired driving in their community.
衡量执法力度的研究调查了警方活动(如检查站、酒后驾车[DWI]专项巡逻)超过某个基线水平是否与撞车事故和死亡人数减少相关。然而,很少有研究试图定量衡量执法力度,并将不同的执法水平与酒后驾车的特定流行程度联系起来。
本研究的目的是调查社区样本中执法强度对涉及饮酒司机的撞车事故发生率的影响。我们分析了不同执法策略和措施的影响:(1)特殊威慑——人均每年酒后驾车(DUI)逮捕人数;(2)一般威慑——清醒检查站行动的频率;(3)高度可见的交通执法——人均每年交通拦截次数;(4)执法存在——人均宣誓警官人数;以及(5)整体交通执法——每个社区人均其他交通执法罚单数量(即安全带罚单、超速罚单以及其他移动违规和警告)。
我们利用了2007年全国路边调查(NRS)中关于当地酒后驾车流行程度的全国性数据、参与2007年NRS的警察部门提供的DUI执法活动测量数据,以及与2007年NRS相同地点的综合估计系统(GES)的撞车事故数据。我们分析了22至26个拥有完整数据的社区中执法强度与酒后驾车撞车事故流行程度之间的关系。在整个研究过程中使用了对数线性回归。
在控制了根据2007年NRS在社区调查道路上合法醉酒司机的百分比后,每10000名驾驶年龄人口中DUI逮捕人数较多与饮酒司机撞车事故与非饮酒司机撞车事故的比例较低相关(p = 0.035)。结果表明,DUI逮捕率增加10%与饮酒司机撞车事故率降低1%相关。每10000名驾驶年龄人口中宣誓警官人数增加也得到了类似结果。
虽然较高的DUI逮捕率与较低的饮酒司机撞车事故率相关,但清醒检查站与饮酒司机撞车事故没有显著关系。这似乎是因为只有3%的在路上司机经常遇到清醒检查站(在我们收到执法数据的36个警察机构中,只有1个每周进行检查站检查)。这种低使用率策略是自20世纪80年代和90年代以来美国检查站使用普遍下降的一个症状,当时酒精影响下驾驶致命撞车事故下降幅度最大。本研究的总体结果可能有助于全国各地的执法机构调整其交通执法强度,以减少其社区内的酒后驾车行为。