CMCR des Massues - Croix-Rouge Française, Lyon, France.
Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle Information Médicale, Evaluation, Recherche, Unité d'Evaluation Médico-Economique, Lyon, France.
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Mar;44(5):788-794. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1777471. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
work still needs to be done to measure the impact of sialorrhea on quality of life and define the efficacy of different therapies. The Drooling Impact Scale showed good validity and sensitivity to change, especially after botulinum toxin injection. The aim of this study is to present its French translation and to explore its validity, reliability and responsiveness to change in a group of children with Cerebral Palsy.
multicentre study at six rehabilitation centres in France. Children with Cerebral Palsy aged 4-18 years with sialorrhea problems were included ( = 55), either in a control group ( = 33) or in the intervention group ( = 22, with 3 drug treatment and 19 botulinum toxin injections). The French Drooling Impact Scale was administered twice, 1 month apart.
The French Drooling Impact Scale total score at inclusion was meanly 53.9 (Standard Deviation 11.9) in the stable control group and 66.0 (16.1) in the intervention group ( = 0.0058). The validity of the scale was established, as well as an adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.71); correlations between each item and the total score were found between 0.5 and 0.71 except for item 5 ( = 0.38) and item 7 (0.41). The test-retest reliability in stable children was good (Lin coefficient = 0.83, bias correction factor = 0.92 and Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.89). There was a high responsiveness to change, mean change was -40.0 in the intervention group and -3.6 in the stable group ( < 0.0001), with Standard Error of Measurement = 2.6.
the French Drooling Impact Scale has shown sufficient clinometric properties to be used now by clinicians or researchers.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe Drooling Impact scale has now its French version.The French version of the Drooling Impact Scale has shown its validity and a good test-retest reliability.The responsiveness to change was explored in a group of children undergoing saliva-control interventions and the scale was able to show a big change.The authors recommend to use this questionnaire in a semi-directed interview conducted by a health professional.
仍需努力衡量流涎对生活质量的影响,并确定不同疗法的疗效。流涎影响量表显示出良好的有效性和对变化的敏感性,尤其是在肉毒毒素注射后。本研究旨在介绍其法译版,并在一组脑瘫儿童中探索其有效性、可靠性和对变化的反应性。
在法国六家康复中心进行的多中心研究。纳入有流涎问题的 4-18 岁脑瘫儿童(n=55),分为对照组(n=33)或干预组(n=22,3 例药物治疗,19 例肉毒毒素注射)。法译版流涎影响量表在 1 个月的间隔内进行两次评估。
稳定对照组的量表总分在纳入时为 53.9(标准差 11.9),干预组为 66.0(16.1)(p=0.0058)。该量表的有效性得到了确立,内部一致性也足够(Cronbach's α=0.71);除第 5 项(p=0.38)和第 7 项(p=0.41)外,各项目与总分之间的相关性在 0.5 至 0.71 之间。在稳定儿童中,测试-重测信度良好(Lin 系数=0.83,偏倚校正因子=0.92,Pearson 相关系数=0.89)。变化的反应性很高,干预组的平均变化为-40.0,稳定组为-3.6(p<0.0001),测量标准误差为 2.6。
法译版流涎影响量表具有足够的临床计量学特性,现在可供临床医生或研究人员使用。
流涎影响量表现在有了它的法译版。流涎影响量表的法译版已显示出其有效性和良好的重测信度。在接受唾液控制干预的一组儿童中,对变化的反应性进行了探讨,该量表能够显示出较大的变化。作者建议在卫生专业人员进行的半指导访谈中使用该问卷。