Suppr超能文献

骨髓抽吸浓缩物在骨关节炎患者膝关节的微骨折中提供了更好的软骨再生效果。

Bone marrow aspirate concentration provided better results in cartilage regeneration to microfracture in knee of osteoarthritic patients.

机构信息

Center for Joint Disease, Chonnam National University Hospital, 42, Jebong-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Gwangju Veterans Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Apr;29(4):1090-1097. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06099-x. Epub 2020 Jun 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether microfracture with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) improves functional outcome and cartilage regeneration better than microfracture alone in patients undergoing high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

Among 436 patients treated with HTO for medial unicompartmental OA with varus deformity between 2010 and 2016, clinical outcomes were retrospectively compared between the microfracture alone group (group I, 43 cases) and microfracture with BMAC augmentation group (group II, 48 cases). Of these, 64 patients underwent a second-look arthroscopic assessment. Clinical outcomes were compared based on the Knee Society Score (KSS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). Cartilage regeneration was assessed according to Koshino's staging system and the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) Cartilage Repair Assessment (CRA) grading system.

RESULTS

At the last follow-up, there were no significant intergroup differences in terms of KSS for pain and function (p > 0.05). Moreover, WOMAC scores were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). Regarding second-look arthroscopy findings, according to Koshino's staging system, there was no significant intergroup difference in terms of defect coverage (p = 0.187). However, group II showed a significantly better mean CRA score than group I (p = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes and cartilage regeneration between the groups. However, the CRA score was significantly higher with BMAC augmentation and microfracture than microfracture alone. Therefore, BMAC augmentation had a synergistic effect for a better cartilage regeneration, although studies with a longer follow-up might help to confirm whether microfracture with BMAC augmentation would ensure better clinical outcomes than microfracture alone for the treatment of knee OA.

摘要

目的

比较微骨折术联合骨髓抽吸浓缩物(BMAC)与单纯微骨折术治疗内侧单间室骨关节炎(OA)患者胫骨高位截骨术(HTO)的功能效果和软骨再生。

方法

2010 年至 2016 年间,436 例接受 HTO 治疗的内侧单间室 OA 合并内翻畸形患者,回顾性比较微骨折术组(I 组,43 例)和微骨折术联合 BMAC 增强组(II 组,48 例)的临床结果。其中,64 例患者接受了第二次关节镜评估。根据膝关节协会评分(KSS)、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)主观评分和西部安大略省和麦克马斯特大学关节炎指数(WOMAC)比较临床结果。根据 Koshino 分期系统和国际软骨修复协会(ICRS)软骨修复评估(CRA)分级系统评估软骨再生。

结果

末次随访时,两组间 KSS 疼痛和功能评分无显著差异(p>0.05)。此外,两组 WOMAC 评分相似(p>0.05)。根据 Koshino 分期系统,第二次关节镜检查结果显示,两组间缺损覆盖程度无显著差异(p=0.187)。然而,与 I 组相比,II 组的平均 CRA 评分显著更高(p=0.035)。

结论

两组间临床结果和软骨再生无显著差异。然而,与单纯微骨折术相比,BMAC 增强和微骨折术的 CRA 评分显著更高。因此,BMAC 增强具有协同作用,可更好地促进软骨再生,尽管需要更长时间的随访研究来证实 BMAC 增强微骨折术是否比单纯微骨折术更能确保更好的临床结果治疗膝 OA。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验