• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Risk of sudden cardiac arrest and ventricular arrhythmia with sulfonylureas: An experience with conceptual replication in two independent populations.磺酰脲类药物致心源性猝死和室性心律失常的风险:两个独立人群的概念复制经验。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 22;10(1):10070. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66668-5.
2
Comparative Safety of Sulfonylureas and the Risk of Sudden Cardiac Arrest and Ventricular Arrhythmia.磺酰脲类药物的安全性比较及与心搏骤停和室性心律失常风险的关系。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Apr;41(4):713-722. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0294. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
3
The risk of sudden cardiac arrest and ventricular arrhythmia with rosiglitazone versus pioglitazone: real-world evidence on thiazolidinedione safety.罗格列酮与吡格列酮致心源性猝死和室性心律失常风险的比较:噻唑烷二酮安全性的真实世界证据。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Feb 25;19(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-00999-5.
4
Comparative Safety of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors and Sudden Cardiac Arrest and Ventricular Arrhythmia: Population-Based Cohort Studies.二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂与心搏骤停和室性心律失常的比较安全性:基于人群的队列研究。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Jan;111(1):227-242. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2381. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
5
The risk of overall mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving glipizide, glyburide, or glimepiride monotherapy: a retrospective analysis.接受格列吡嗪、格列本脲或格列美脲单药治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的总体死亡率风险:一项回顾性分析。
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jun;33(6):1224-9. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0017. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
6
The second generation sulfonylureas: glipizide and glyburide.第二代磺脲类药物:格列吡嗪和格列本脲。
Diabetes Educ. 1985 Fall;11(3):29-36. doi: 10.1177/014572178501100305.
7
Sulfonylureas and the Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmias Among People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies.磺酰脲类药物与 2 型糖尿病患者室性心律失常风险:观察性研究的系统评价。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Jun;111(6):1248-1257. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2570. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
8
Increase in overall mortality risk in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving glipizide, glyburide or glimepiride monotherapy versus metformin: a retrospective analysis.与二甲双胍相比,接受格列吡嗪、格列本脲或格列美脲单药治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的总体死亡率风险增加:一项回顾性分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012 Sep;14(9):803-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01604.x. Epub 2012 Apr 29.
9
Pharmacologic Differences of Sulfonylureas and the Risk of Adverse Cardiovascular and Hypoglycemic Events.磺酰脲类药物的药理差异与不良心血管和低血糖事件风险。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Nov;40(11):1506-1513. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0595. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
10
The risk of overall mortality in patients with Type 2 diabetes receiving different combinations of sulfonylureas and metformin: a retrospective analysis.2 型糖尿病患者接受不同磺脲类药物和二甲双胍联合治疗的总体死亡率风险:一项回顾性分析。
Diabet Med. 2012 Aug;29(8):1029-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03577.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Do relationships between ambient temperature and serious adverse health outcomes vary among users of different antidiabetes drugs? A retrospective cohort study of US Medicaid beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes.环境温度与严重不良健康结局之间的关系是否因使用不同抗糖尿病药物的患者而异?一项对美国医疗补助计划 2 型糖尿病受益人的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 21;14(10):e085139. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085139.
2
Epidemiological trends and clinical outcomes of cryptococcosis in a medically insured population in the United States: a claims-based analysis from 2017 to 2019.美国参保人群中隐球菌病的流行病学趋势及临床结局:一项基于2017年至2019年理赔数据的分析
Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2024 Apr 18;11:20499361241244967. doi: 10.1177/20499361241244967. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Associations between Oral Glucose-Lowering Agents and Increased Risk for Life-Threatening Arrhythmias in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus-A Literature Review.口服降糖药与 2 型糖尿病患者发生危及生命的心律失常风险增加的相关性:文献综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Oct 2;59(10):1760. doi: 10.3390/medicina59101760.
4
The impact of commercial health datasets on medical research and health-care algorithms.商业健康数据集对医学研究和医疗保健算法的影响。
Lancet Digit Health. 2023 May;5(5):e288-e294. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00025-0.
5
Validation of ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM Diagnostic Codes for Identifying Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in a National Health Insurance Claims Database.在国家医疗保险理赔数据库中,用于识别院外心脏骤停患者的ICD-9-CM和ICD-10-CM诊断编码的验证
Clin Epidemiol. 2022 May 31;14:721-730. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S366874. eCollection 2022.
6
Drug-induced Sudden Death: A Scoping Review.药物性猝死:范围综述。
Curr Drug Saf. 2023;18(3):307-317. doi: 10.2174/1574886317666220525115232.

本文引用的文献

1
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2019年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2019 Mar 5;139(10):e56-e528. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659.
2
Comparative Safety of Sulfonylureas and the Risk of Sudden Cardiac Arrest and Ventricular Arrhythmia.磺酰脲类药物的安全性比较及与心搏骤停和室性心律失常风险的关系。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Apr;41(4):713-722. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0294. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
3
Reporting to Improve Reproducibility and Facilitate Validity Assessment for Healthcare Database Studies V1.0.报告以提高医疗保健数据库研究的可重复性并促进有效性评估V1.0版
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Sep;26(9):1018-1032. doi: 10.1002/pds.4295.
4
Pro- and Antiarrhythmic Actions of Sulfonylureas: Mechanistic and Clinical Evidence.磺脲类药物的促心律失常和抗心律失常作用:机制与临床证据
Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Aug;28(8):561-586. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 May 22.
5
Trends in Drug Utilization, Glycemic Control, and Rates of Severe Hypoglycemia, 2006-2013.2006 - 2013年药物使用、血糖控制及严重低血糖发生率的趋势
Diabetes Care. 2017 Apr;40(4):468-475. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0985. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
6
The Association between Sulfonylurea Use and All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality: A Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.磺脲类药物使用与全因死亡率和心血管死亡率之间的关联:一项对随机临床试验进行序贯分析的荟萃分析
PLoS Med. 2016 Apr 12;13(4):e1001992. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001992. eCollection 2016 Apr.
7
The active comparator, new user study design in pharmacoepidemiology: historical foundations and contemporary application.药物流行病学中的活性对照、新用户研究设计:历史基础与当代应用。
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2015 Dec;2(4):221-228. doi: 10.1007/s40471-015-0053-5. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
8
Cardiovascular risk associated with the use of glitazones, metformin and sufonylureas: meta-analysis of published observational studies.与使用格列酮类、二甲双胍和磺脲类药物相关的心血管风险:已发表观察性研究的荟萃分析
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Jan 15;16:14. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0187-5.
9
Transparency and Reproducibility of Observational Cohort Studies Using Large Healthcare Databases.使用大型医疗数据库的观察性队列研究的透明度和可重复性
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Mar;99(3):325-32. doi: 10.1002/cpt.329.
10
Trends in Prescription Drug Use Among Adults in the United States From 1999-2012.1999 - 2012年美国成年人处方药使用趋势
JAMA. 2015 Nov 3;314(17):1818-31. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13766.

磺酰脲类药物致心源性猝死和室性心律失常的风险:两个独立人群的概念复制经验。

Risk of sudden cardiac arrest and ventricular arrhythmia with sulfonylureas: An experience with conceptual replication in two independent populations.

机构信息

Center for Pharmacoepidemiology Research and Training, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Endocrinology Service, Department of Subspecialty Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 22;10(1):10070. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66668-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-66668-5
PMID:32572080
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7308403/
Abstract

Sulfonylureas are commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus. Despite awareness of their effects on cardiac physiology, a knowledge gap exists regarding their effects on cardiovascular events in real-world populations. Prior studies reported sulfonylurea-associated cardiovascular death but not serious arrhythmogenic endpoints like sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) or ventricular arrhythmia (VA). We assessed the comparative real-world risk of SCA/VA among users of second-generation sulfonylureas: glimepiride, glyburide, and glipizide. We conducted two incident user cohort studies using five-state Medicaid claims (1999-2012) and Optum Clinformatics commercial claims (2000-2016). Outcomes were SCA/VA events precipitating hospital presentation. We used Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for high-dimensional propensity scores, to generate adjusted hazard ratios (aHR). We identified 624,406 and 491,940 sulfonylurea users, and 714 and 385 SCA/VA events, in Medicaid and Optum, respectively. Dataset-specific associations with SCA/VA for both glimepiride and glyburide (vs. glipizide) were on opposite sides of and could not exclude the null (glimepiride: aHR 1.17, 95% CI 0.96-1.42; aHR 0.84, 0.65-1.08; glyburide: aHR 0.87, 0.74-1.03; aHR 1.11, 0.86-1.42). Database differences in data availability, populations, and documentation completeness may have contributed to the incongruous results. Emphasis should be placed on assessing potential causes of discrepancies between conflicting studies evaluating the same research question.

摘要

磺酰脲类药物常用于治疗 2 型糖尿病。尽管人们已经意识到它们对心脏生理学的影响,但对于它们在真实人群中的心血管事件的影响,仍然存在知识空白。先前的研究报告了磺酰脲类药物相关的心血管死亡,但没有报告严重的致心律失常终点,如心搏骤停(SCA)或室性心律失常(VA)。我们评估了第二代磺酰脲类药物(格列美脲、格列本脲和格列吡嗪)使用者发生 SCA/VA 的相对真实世界风险。我们使用了五个州的医疗补助(1999-2012 年)和 Optum Clinformatics 商业索赔(2000-2016 年)的两个事件使用者队列研究。结局是导致住院的 SCA/VA 事件。我们使用 Cox 比例风险模型,根据高维倾向评分进行调整,以生成调整后的危险比(aHR)。我们分别在医疗补助和 Optum 中确定了 624406 名和 491940 名磺酰脲类药物使用者,以及 714 名和 385 名 SCA/VA 事件。对于格列美脲和格列本脲(与格列吡嗪相比),两个数据集的 SCA/VA 相关性都在零假设的相反方向上,不能排除零假设(格列美脲:aHR1.17,95%CI0.96-1.42;aHR0.84,0.65-1.08;格列本脲:aHR0.87,0.74-1.03;aHR1.11,0.86-1.42)。数据可用性、人群和文档完整性方面的数据库差异可能导致了结果不一致。应该强调的是,要评估评估同一研究问题的相互矛盾的研究之间差异的潜在原因。