Suppr超能文献

磺酰脲类药物致心源性猝死和室性心律失常的风险:两个独立人群的概念复制经验。

Risk of sudden cardiac arrest and ventricular arrhythmia with sulfonylureas: An experience with conceptual replication in two independent populations.

机构信息

Center for Pharmacoepidemiology Research and Training, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Endocrinology Service, Department of Subspecialty Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 22;10(1):10070. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66668-5.

Abstract

Sulfonylureas are commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus. Despite awareness of their effects on cardiac physiology, a knowledge gap exists regarding their effects on cardiovascular events in real-world populations. Prior studies reported sulfonylurea-associated cardiovascular death but not serious arrhythmogenic endpoints like sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) or ventricular arrhythmia (VA). We assessed the comparative real-world risk of SCA/VA among users of second-generation sulfonylureas: glimepiride, glyburide, and glipizide. We conducted two incident user cohort studies using five-state Medicaid claims (1999-2012) and Optum Clinformatics commercial claims (2000-2016). Outcomes were SCA/VA events precipitating hospital presentation. We used Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for high-dimensional propensity scores, to generate adjusted hazard ratios (aHR). We identified 624,406 and 491,940 sulfonylurea users, and 714 and 385 SCA/VA events, in Medicaid and Optum, respectively. Dataset-specific associations with SCA/VA for both glimepiride and glyburide (vs. glipizide) were on opposite sides of and could not exclude the null (glimepiride: aHR 1.17, 95% CI 0.96-1.42; aHR 0.84, 0.65-1.08; glyburide: aHR 0.87, 0.74-1.03; aHR 1.11, 0.86-1.42). Database differences in data availability, populations, and documentation completeness may have contributed to the incongruous results. Emphasis should be placed on assessing potential causes of discrepancies between conflicting studies evaluating the same research question.

摘要

磺酰脲类药物常用于治疗 2 型糖尿病。尽管人们已经意识到它们对心脏生理学的影响,但对于它们在真实人群中的心血管事件的影响,仍然存在知识空白。先前的研究报告了磺酰脲类药物相关的心血管死亡,但没有报告严重的致心律失常终点,如心搏骤停(SCA)或室性心律失常(VA)。我们评估了第二代磺酰脲类药物(格列美脲、格列本脲和格列吡嗪)使用者发生 SCA/VA 的相对真实世界风险。我们使用了五个州的医疗补助(1999-2012 年)和 Optum Clinformatics 商业索赔(2000-2016 年)的两个事件使用者队列研究。结局是导致住院的 SCA/VA 事件。我们使用 Cox 比例风险模型,根据高维倾向评分进行调整,以生成调整后的危险比(aHR)。我们分别在医疗补助和 Optum 中确定了 624406 名和 491940 名磺酰脲类药物使用者,以及 714 名和 385 名 SCA/VA 事件。对于格列美脲和格列本脲(与格列吡嗪相比),两个数据集的 SCA/VA 相关性都在零假设的相反方向上,不能排除零假设(格列美脲:aHR1.17,95%CI0.96-1.42;aHR0.84,0.65-1.08;格列本脲:aHR0.87,0.74-1.03;aHR1.11,0.86-1.42)。数据可用性、人群和文档完整性方面的数据库差异可能导致了结果不一致。应该强调的是,要评估评估同一研究问题的相互矛盾的研究之间差异的潜在原因。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Drug-induced Sudden Death: A Scoping Review.药物性猝死:范围综述。
Curr Drug Saf. 2023;18(3):307-317. doi: 10.2174/1574886317666220525115232.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验