Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Jun;111(6):1248-1257. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2570. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
Previous studies have suggested an association between sulfonylureas and an increased risk of cardiovascular death among patients with type 2 diabetes. A potential mechanism involves sulfonylurea-induced ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). We conducted a systematic review of observational studies to determine whether the use of sulfonylureas, compared with the use of other antihyperglycemic drugs, is associated with the risk of VA (ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, and premature ventricular complexes), cardiac arrest, and sudden cardiac death among patients with type 2 diabetes. Two independent reviewers searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to July 2021 for observational studies comparing sulfonylureas vs. other antihyperglycemic therapies or intraclass comparisons of sulfonylureas. Our systematic review included 17 studies (1,607,612 patients). Per Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS)-I, there were few high-quality studies (2 studies at moderate risk of bias; 4 at serious risk; and 11 at critical risk). All studies at a moderate or serious risk of bias reporting comparisons with other therapies were consistent with an increased risk of VA. Sulfonylureas were associated with a higher risk of arrhythmia vs. dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 1.52, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27-1.80) and of VA vs. metformin (aHR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.10-2.13). One moderate quality study reported inconsistent results for a composite of cardiac arrest/VA in analyses of US Medicaid claims and Optum claims data. Our systematic review suggests that, among higher-quality observational studies, sulfonylureas are associated with an increased risk of VA. However, we identified few methodologically rigorous studies, underscoring the need for additional real-world studies.
先前的研究表明,磺酰脲类药物与 2 型糖尿病患者心血管死亡风险增加之间存在关联。一个潜在的机制涉及磺酰脲类药物引起的室性心律失常(VA)。我们对观察性研究进行了系统评价,以确定与其他抗高血糖药物相比,磺酰脲类药物的使用是否与 2 型糖尿病患者的 VA(室性心动过速、心室颤动和室性早搏)、心脏骤停和心源性猝死风险相关。两名独立的审查员从研究开始到 2021 年 7 月在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL Plus、CENTRAL 和 ClinicalTrials.gov 上搜索了比较磺酰脲类药物与其他抗高血糖疗法或磺酰脲类药物类内比较的观察性研究。我们的系统评价包括 17 项研究(1607612 名患者)。根据非随机干预研究的风险评估(ROBINS-I),高质量研究较少(2 项研究存在中度偏倚风险;4 项研究存在严重偏倚风险;11 项研究存在关键偏倚风险)。所有存在中度或严重偏倚风险的研究报告了与其他疗法的比较结果,这些结果均表明 VA 的风险增加。与二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂相比,磺酰脲类药物与心律失常的风险更高(调整后的危害比(aHR):1.52,95%置信区间(CI):1.27-1.80),与二甲双胍相比,VA 的风险更高(aHR:1.52,95%CI:1.10-2.13)。一项中等质量的研究报告了在美国医疗补助索赔和 Optum 索赔数据中分析的心脏骤停/VA 综合结果不一致。我们的系统评价表明,在高质量的观察性研究中,磺酰脲类药物与 VA 风险增加相关。然而,我们发现的方法严谨的研究很少,这突出表明需要进行更多的真实世界研究。