McCoy Liam G, Nagaraj Sujay, Morgado Felipe, Harish Vinyas, Das Sunit, Celi Leo Anthony
Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Medical Sciences Building, 1 King's College Cir, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8 Canada.
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St 4th Floor, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6 Canada.
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Jun 19;3:86. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0294-7. eCollection 2020.
With emerging innovations in artificial intelligence (AI) poised to substantially impact medical practice, interest in training current and future physicians about the technology is growing. Alongside comes the question of what, precisely, should medical students be taught. While competencies for the clinical usage of AI are broadly similar to those for any other novel technology, there are qualitative differences of critical importance to concerns regarding explainability, health equity, and data security. Drawing on experiences at the University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine and MIT Critical Data's "datathons", the authors advocate for a dual-focused approach: combining robust data science-focused additions to baseline health research curricula and extracurricular programs to cultivate leadership in this space.
随着人工智能(AI)领域的新兴创新有望对医疗实践产生重大影响,针对当前和未来医生进行该技术培训的关注度日益提高。随之而来的问题是,究竟应该教给医学生什么。虽然人工智能临床应用的能力与其他任何新技术的能力大致相似,但在可解释性、健康公平性和数据安全等方面存在至关重要的质的差异。作者借鉴多伦多大学医学院和麻省理工学院关键数据实验室的“数据马拉松”经验,主张采用双重点方法:在基础健康研究课程和课外项目中增加以强大数据科学为重点的内容,以培养该领域的领导力。