Wilkins Anna, Mossop Helen, Syndikus Isabel, Khoo Vincent, Bloomfield David, Parker Chris, Logue John, Scrase Christopher, Patterson Helen, Birtle Alison, Staffurth John, Malik Zafar, Panades Miguel, Eswar Chinnamani, Graham John, Russell Martin, Kirkbride Peter, O'Sullivan Joe M, Gao Annie, Cruickshank Clare, Griffin Clare, Dearnaley David, Hall Emma
The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK.
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Dec;16(16):1605-16. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00280-6. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) might detect more toxic effects of radiotherapy than do clinician-reported outcomes. We did a quality of life (QoL) substudy to assess PROs up to 24 months after conventionally fractionated or hypofractionated radiotherapy in the Conventional or Hypofractionated High Dose Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer (CHHiP) trial.
The CHHiP trial is a randomised, non-inferiority phase 3 trial done in 71 centres, of which 57 UK hospitals took part in the QoL substudy. Men with localised prostate cancer who were undergoing radiotherapy were eligible for trial entry if they had histologically confirmed T1b-T3aN0M0 prostate cancer, an estimated risk of seminal vesicle involvement less than 30%, prostate-specific antigen concentration less than 30 ng/mL, and a WHO performance status of 0 or 1. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive a standard fractionation schedule of 74 Gy in 37 fractions or one of two hypofractionated schedules: 60 Gy in 20 fractions or 57 Gy in 19 fractions. Randomisation was done with computer-generated permuted block sizes of six and nine, stratified by centre and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk group. Treatment allocation was not masked. UCLA Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA-PCI), including Short Form (SF)-36 and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P), or Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) and SF-12 quality-of-life questionnaires were completed at baseline, pre-radiotherapy, 10 weeks post-radiotherapy, and 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-radiotherapy. The CHHiP trial completed accrual on June 16, 2011, and the QoL substudy was closed to further recruitment on Nov 1, 2009. Analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary endpoint of the QoL substudy was overall bowel bother and comparisons between fractionation groups were done at 24 months post-radiotherapy. The CHHiP trial is registered with ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN97182923.
2100 participants in the CHHiP trial consented to be included in the QoL substudy: 696 assigned to the 74 Gy schedule, 698 assigned to the 60 Gy schedule, and 706 assigned to the 57 Gy schedule. Of these individuals, 1659 (79%) provided data pre-radiotherapy and 1444 (69%) provided data at 24 months after radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 50·0 months (IQR 38·4-64·2) on April 9, 2014, which was the most recent follow-up measurement of all data collected before the QoL data were analysed in September, 2014. Comparison of 74 Gy in 37 fractions, 60 Gy in 20 fractions, and 57 Gy in 19 fractions groups at 2 years showed no overall bowel bother in 269 (66%), 266 (65%), and 282 (65%) men; very small bother in 92 (22%), 91 (22%), and 93 (21%) men; small bother in 26 (6%), 28 (7%), and 38 (9%) men; moderate bother in 19 (5%), 23 (6%), and 21 (5%) men, and severe bother in four (<1%), three (<1%) and three (<1%) men respectively (74 Gy vs 60 Gy, ptrend=0.64, 74 Gy vs 57 Gy, ptrend=0·59). We saw no differences between treatment groups in change of bowel bother score from baseline or pre-radiotherapy to 24 months.
The incidence of patient-reported bowel symptoms was low and similar between patients in the 74 Gy control group and the hypofractionated groups up to 24 months after radiotherapy. If efficacy outcomes from CHHiP show non-inferiority for hypofractionated treatments, these findings will add to the growing evidence for moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules becoming the standard treatment for localised prostate cancer.
Cancer Research UK, Department of Health, and the National Institute for Health Research Cancer Research Network.
与临床医生报告的结果相比,患者报告的结果(PROs)可能更能检测出放疗的毒性作用。我们开展了一项生活质量(QoL)子研究,以评估在前列腺癌常规或大分割高剂量调强放疗(CHHiP)试验中,接受常规分割或大分割放疗后长达24个月的患者报告结果。
CHHiP试验是一项在71个中心进行的随机、非劣效性3期试验,其中57家英国医院参与了QoL子研究。接受放疗的局限性前列腺癌男性患者,若组织学确诊为T1b-T3aN0M0前列腺癌、精囊受累估计风险小于30%、前列腺特异性抗原浓度小于30 ng/mL且世界卫生组织体能状态为0或1,则符合试验入组条件。参与者被随机分配(1:1:1)接受74 Gy分37次的标准分割方案,或两种大分割方案之一:60 Gy分20次或57 Gy分19次。随机分组采用计算机生成的6和9的置换块大小,按中心和美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)风险组进行分层。治疗分配未设盲。在基线、放疗前、放疗后10周以及放疗后6、12、18和24个月完成加州大学洛杉矶分校前列腺癌指数(UCLA-PCI),包括简明健康调查问卷(SF)-36和癌症治疗功能评估-前列腺(FACT-P),或扩展前列腺癌指数综合问卷(EPIC)和SF-12生活质量问卷。CHHiP试验于2011年6月16日完成入组,QoL子研究于2009年11月1日停止进一步招募。分析采用意向性分析。QoL子研究的主要终点是总体肠道困扰,放疗后24个月对分割组之间进行比较。CHHiP试验已在国际标准随机对照试验编号注册中心注册,编号为ISRCTN97182923。
CHHiP试验中的2100名参与者同意纳入QoL子研究:696人分配至74 Gy方案组,698人分配至60 Gy方案组,706人分配至57 Gy方案组。在这些个体中,1659人(79%)在放疗前提供了数据,1444人(69%)在放疗后24个月提供了数据。在2014年4月9日进行了中位随访50.0个月(四分位间距38.4 - 64.2个月),这是在2014年9月分析QoL数据之前收集的所有数据的最新随访测量。在2年时,比较74 Gy分37次、60 Gy分20次和57 Gy分19次组,269名(66%)、266名(65%)和282名(65%)男性无总体肠道困扰;92名(22%)、91名(22%)和93名(21%)男性有非常小的困扰;26名(6%)、28名(7%)和38名(9%)男性有小困扰;19名(5%)、23名(6%)和21名(5%)男性有中度困扰,分别有4名(<1%)、3名(<1%)和3名(<1%)男性有严重困扰(74 Gy vs 60 Gy,趋势p = 0.64,74 Gy vs 57 Gy,趋势p = 0.59)。我们未发现治疗组在从基线或放疗前到24个月的肠道困扰评分变化方面存在差异。
放疗后长达24个月,患者报告的肠道症状发生率较低,74 Gy对照组与大分割组患者之间相似。如果CHHiP试验的疗效结果显示大分割治疗非劣效,这些发现将为越来越多的证据增添支持,即适度大分割放疗方案正成为局限性前列腺癌的标准治疗方法。
英国癌症研究中心、卫生部和英国国家卫生研究院癌症研究网络。