Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital, No. 24 Fukang Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300192, China.
Institute of Otolaryngology of Tianjin, Tianjin, China.
Sleep Breath. 2021 Mar;25(1):433-439. doi: 10.1007/s11325-020-02102-4. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
The purposes of this study were to explore the effect of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) on the voice by analyzing the acoustic parameters between patients with OSAHS and those without OSAHS and to compare acoustic analyses performed by two software programs (MDVP and Praat).
Patients with OSAHS (n = 75) and normal controls (n = 46) were asked to produce a sustained sound of the vowel /i/ and were analyzed with electroglottography (EGG), MDVP, and Praat software. A self-rated scale (Voice Handicap Index, VHI-10) and acoustic parameters were compared.
There were no statistically significant differences in the fundamental frequency (F0), jitter, shimmer, noise/harmonic ratio (NHR), contact quotient perturbation (CQP), or contact index perturbation (CIP) between the patient group and the normal group. The VHI-10 values were significantly increased in patients with OSAHS. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis suggested that the shimmer obtained from MDVP and Praat possessed relatively high accuracy in differentiating patients with OSAHS from healthy individuals. The results for F0, jitter, shimmer, and NHR were significantly different between MDVP and Praat in OSAHS patients. In normal persons, there was a significant difference in NHR; however, no significant differences were found for F0, jitter, or shimmer between the two software programs. The results demonstrated that high correlations were found between values obtained by both software programs.
Patients with OSAHS were prone to vibration irregularity, incomplete glottal closure, hoarseness, and other vocal problems. The two acoustic software programs present different values of acoustic measures. There was a strong correlation and consistency between the parameters calculated by the two software programs.
本研究旨在通过分析阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征(OSAHS)患者与非 OSAHS 患者的声学参数,探讨 OSAHS 对嗓音的影响,并比较两种软件(MDVP 和 Praat)的声学分析结果。
要求 OSAHS 患者(n=75)和正常对照者(n=46)发/i/音,并用电声门图(EGG)、MDVP 和 Praat 软件进行分析。比较嗓音障碍指数(VHI-10)自评量表和声学参数。
患者组和正常组的基频(F0)、微扰、振幅微扰、噪声/谐波比(NHR)、接触商微扰(CQP)和接触指数微扰(CIP)均无统计学差异。OSAHS 患者的 VHI-10 值明显升高。受试者工作特征(ROC)分析表明,MDVP 和 Praat 获得的微扰在区分 OSAHS 患者和健康个体方面具有较高的准确性。在 OSAHS 患者中,F0、微扰、振幅微扰和 NHR 的结果在 MDVP 和 Praat 之间存在显著差异。在正常个体中,NHR 存在显著差异;然而,在 F0、微扰或振幅微扰方面,两种软件之间没有显著差异。结果表明,两种软件获得的值之间存在高度相关性。
OSAHS 患者易出现振动不规则、声门不完全关闭、嘶哑等嗓音问题。两种声学软件呈现出不同的声学测量值。两种软件计算的参数之间具有很强的相关性和一致性。