Suppr超能文献

DSM-5 替代人格障碍模型特征在青少年中是五因素模型特征的极端变体。

DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model traits as extreme variants of five-factor model traits in adolescents.

机构信息

Department of Developmental Psychology, Utrecht University.

Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota.

出版信息

Personal Disord. 2021 Jan;12(1):59-69. doi: 10.1037/per0000409. Epub 2020 Jun 25.

Abstract

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) recognizes a developmental perspective on personality pathology owing to its proposal to conceptualize personality pathology in terms of maladaptive personality traits. Previous research has found that the DSM-5 maladaptive traits and the five-factor model (FFM) for normative personality traits share common underlying dimensions. Although the DSM-5 generally assumes DSM-5 traits to be extreme versions of FFM traits, empirical evidence is scarce in adolescents. The present study therefore extended previous studies by comparing the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 and the Big Five Inventory-2 (BFI-2) in an adolescent sample ( = 353), using item response theory. Results indicated an underlying dimension for all domain pairs except for FFM Openness and Psychoticism. Consistent with the general assumption, IRT results demonstrated that Personality Inventory for DSM-5 scales generally provided more information than the BFI-2 scales at the upper levels of the latent dimension. The BFI-2 scales provided more information at the lower levels. For FFM Conscientiousness and Disinhibition, however, the BFI-2 scale provided more information for almost the entire range of the latent dimension. The findings indicate similarities in the DSM-5 conceptualization of personality pathology between adults and adolescents and at the same time identify important differences that need to be considered. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)承认了一种人格病理学的发展视角,因为它提议根据适应不良的人格特质来概念化人格病理学。先前的研究发现,DSM-5 的适应不良特征和规范人格特质的五因素模型(FFM)共享共同的潜在维度。尽管 DSM-5 通常假设 DSM-5 特征是 FFM 特征的极端版本,但在青少年中实证证据很少。因此,本研究通过使用项目反应理论,在青少年样本(n=353)中比较了《DSM-5 人格量表》和《大五人格量表-2》(BFI-2),扩展了之前的研究。结果表明,除了 FFM 的开放性和精神病性之外,所有领域对都存在一个潜在维度。与一般假设一致,IRT 结果表明,人格量表通常在潜在维度的较高水平上提供比 BFI-2 量表更多的信息。BFI-2 量表在较低水平上提供更多信息。然而,对于 FFM 的尽责性和抑制性,BFI-2 量表几乎在整个潜在维度范围内提供了更多的信息。这些发现表明,DSM-5 在成人和青少年之间对人格病理学的概念化存在相似之处,但同时也确定了需要考虑的重要差异。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model traits as extreme variants of five-factor model traits in adolescents.
Personal Disord. 2021 Jan;12(1):59-69. doi: 10.1037/per0000409. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
3
The DSM-5 dimensional trait model and five-factor models of general personality.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2013 Aug;122(3):816-21. doi: 10.1037/a0032822. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
4
[Validation of a French translation of Krueger's personality inventory for DSM-5 in its brief form (PID-5 BF)].
Encephale. 2018 Feb;44(1):9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
6
General and maladaptive traits in a five-factor framework for DSM-5 in a university student sample.
Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):295-307. doi: 10.1177/1073191113475808. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
7
Capturing the DSM-5 Alternative Personality Disorder Model Traits in the Five-Factor Model's Nomological Net.
J Pers. 2017 Apr;85(2):220-231. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12235. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
8
Alignment of the personality inventory for ICD-11 with the five-factor model of personality.
Psychol Assess. 2022 Jul;34(7):711-716. doi: 10.1037/pas0001141. Epub 2022 May 5.
9
Experimental Manipulation of the BFI-2, IPIP-NEO-120, and the IPC-5.
Assessment. 2023 Jul;30(5):1543-1556. doi: 10.1177/10731911221107622. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
10
The bipolarity of normal and abnormal personality structure: Implications for assessment.
Psychol Assess. 2019 Apr;31(4):420-431. doi: 10.1037/pas0000546. Epub 2019 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

2
Associations Between Both Adaptive and Maladaptive Personality Constructs and Emotional Load and Content of Adult Dreams.
Indian J Psychol Med. 2025 Jan;47(1):39-47. doi: 10.1177/02537176241235367. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
3
Connecting quantitatively derived personality-psychopathology models and neuroscience.
Personal Neurosci. 2021 Oct 8;4:e4. doi: 10.1017/pen.2021.3. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

3
A meta-analysis of the five-factor internal structure of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5.
Psychol Assess. 2018 Sep;30(9):1255-1260. doi: 10.1037/pas0000605. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
4
Bruno Klopfer Award Address: Five-Factor Model Personality Disorder Scales.
J Pers Assess. 2020 Jan-Feb;102(1):1-9. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1477051. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
6
The DSM-5 Trait Measure in a Psychiatric Sample of Late Adolescents and Emerging Adults: Structure, Reliability, and Validity.
J Pers Disord. 2019 Feb;33(1):101-118. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2018_32_333. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
9
Item response theory applications in personality disorder research.
Personal Disord. 2017 Oct;8(4):298-308. doi: 10.1037/per0000209.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验