Massive Data Institute, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 25;15(6):e0234718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234718. eCollection 2020.
Evidence exists that depression interacts with physical illness to amplify the impact of chronic conditions like diabetes. The co-occurrence of these two conditions leads to worse health outcomes and higher healthcare costs. This study seeks to understand what demographic and socio-economic indicators can be used to predict co-occurrence at both the state and the individual level. Diabetes and depression are modeled as a bivariate normal distribution using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2016-2017 cohorts. The tetrachoric (latent) correlation between diabetes and depression is 17.2% and statistically significant, however the likelihood of any person being diagnosed with both conditions is small-as high as 4.3% (Arizona) and as low as 2.3% (Utah). We find that demographic characteristics (sex, age, and race) operate in opposite directions in predicting diabetes and depression diagnosis. Behavioral indicators (BMI≥30, smoking, and exercise); and life outcomes, (schooling attainment, marital and veteran status) work in the same direction to produce co-occurrence and as such are more powerful predictors of co-occurrence than demographic characteristics. It is important to have a rapid and efficient instrument to diagnoses co-occurrence. Simple questions about lifestyle choices, educational attainment and family life could help bridge the gap between primary care and psychological services with beneficial spillovers for patient-doctor communication.
有证据表明,抑郁与身体疾病相互作用,会放大糖尿病等慢性疾病的影响。这两种情况同时发生会导致更糟糕的健康结果和更高的医疗保健成本。本研究旨在了解哪些人口统计学和社会经济指标可用于预测州和个人层面的共病情况。使用来自 2016-2017 年行为风险因素监测系统的数据,将糖尿病和抑郁症建模为双变量正态分布。糖尿病和抑郁症之间的四次相关(潜在)相关性为 17.2%,具有统计学意义,但是同时患有这两种疾病的人的可能性很小——高达 4.3%(亚利桑那州),低至 2.3%(犹他州)。我们发现,人口统计学特征(性别、年龄和种族)在预测糖尿病和抑郁症诊断时的作用方向相反。行为指标(BMI≥30、吸烟和锻炼);以及生活结果(受教育程度、婚姻和退伍军人身份)朝着相同的方向发挥作用,从而导致共病发生,因此比人口统计学特征更能有效地预测共病发生。拥有一种快速有效的诊断共病的工具非常重要。关于生活方式选择、教育程度和家庭生活的简单问题可以帮助弥合初级保健和心理服务之间的差距,从而为医患沟通带来有益的溢出效应。