Department of Radiation Oncology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, Taiwan.
Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 23;17(12):4510. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124510.
The aim was to compare the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of cervical cancer between elderly and younger women, and to explore which treatment strategy is more appropriate for elderly patients. We retrospectively reviewed patients with cervical cancer receiving definitive radiotherapy (RT) between 2007 and 2016, and divided them into two age groups: age < 70 vs. age ≥ 70. The clinical outcomes were compared between the two age groups. The median follow-up was 32.2 months. A total of 123 patients were eligible, 83 patients in group 1 (age < 70), and 40 patients in group 2 (age ≥ 70). Patients in group 2 received less intracavitary brachytherapy (ICRT) application, less total RT dose, and less concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), and tended to have more limited external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) volume. The treatment outcomes between the age groups revealed significant differences in 5-year overall survival (OS), but no differences in 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS), 66.2% vs. 64.5%, and other loco-regional control. In multivariate analyses for all patients, the performance status, pathology with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, and ICRT application were prognostic factors of CSS. The elderly patients with cervical cancer had comparable CSS and loco-regional control rates, despite receiving less comprehensive treatment. Conservative treatment strategies with RT alone could be appropriate for patients aged ≥ 70 y/o, especially for those with favorable stages or histopathology.
目的是比较老年和年轻女性宫颈癌的临床结局和预后因素,并探讨哪种治疗策略更适合老年患者。我们回顾性分析了 2007 年至 2016 年间接受根治性放疗(RT)的宫颈癌患者,并将其分为两组年龄:<70 岁和≥70 岁。比较两组的临床结局。中位随访时间为 32.2 个月。共纳入 123 例患者,其中 83 例患者在年龄<70 岁的组 1 中,40 例患者在年龄≥70 岁的组 2 中。组 2 患者接受腔内近距离放疗(ICRT)应用较少、总 RT 剂量较低、同期放化疗(CCRT)较少,且外照射放疗(EBRT)体积受限更多。两组的治疗结果在 5 年总生存率(OS)方面有显著差异,但在 5 年癌症特异性生存率(CSS)和局部区域控制方面无差异。在所有患者的多因素分析中,表现状态、鳞癌(SCC)病理、国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)分期和 ICRT 应用是 CSS 的预后因素。尽管接受了不那么全面的治疗,老年宫颈癌患者的 CSS 和局部区域控制率仍相当。对于年龄≥70 岁的患者,单独接受 RT 的保守治疗策略可能是合适的,尤其是对于那些具有良好分期或组织病理学的患者。