• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

邻里环境、基因影响与生活满意度:来自德国双胞胎家庭面板的证据。

Neighborhood context, genetic influences, and life satisfaction: Evidence from the German twin family panel.

作者信息

Harerimana Nadia V, Liu Yixuan, Ruks Mirko

机构信息

Max Planck Research Group Biosocial - Biology, Social Disparities, and Development, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.

Faculty of Sociology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Aug 25;20(8):e0316416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316416. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0316416
PMID:40853939
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12377583/
Abstract

Both genetic influences and neighborhood environments play a role in shaping life satisfaction. However, research examining gene-environment interactions (GxE) in this context remains limited. This study investigates how neighborhood deprivation moderates the effects of genetic influences on life satisfaction. Using data from 760 dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs in the German Twin Family Panel (TwinLife), we apply twin fixed-effect models to estimate GxE effects. Results indicate that a Polygenic index (PGI) for subjective well-being is positively associated with life satisfaction. Notably, this association is strongest among individuals living in moderately deprived neighborhoods, and weaker in both highly deprived and less deprived areas. Thus, there are signs of compensation in less deprived areas and, particularly, diathesis-stress/triggering in highly deprived areas.

摘要

遗传影响和邻里环境在塑造生活满意度方面都发挥着作用。然而,在这种背景下研究基因-环境相互作用(GxE)的研究仍然有限。本研究调查了邻里贫困如何调节遗传影响对生活满意度的作用。利用德国双胞胎家庭面板(TwinLife)中760对异卵(DZ)双胞胎的数据,我们应用双胞胎固定效应模型来估计GxE效应。结果表明,主观幸福感的多基因指数(PGI)与生活满意度呈正相关。值得注意的是,这种关联在生活在中度贫困社区的个体中最为强烈,而在高度贫困和贫困程度较低的地区则较弱。因此,在贫困程度较低的地区有补偿迹象,特别是在高度贫困地区有素质-应激/触发迹象。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d0/12377583/eeaef4480c15/pone.0316416.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d0/12377583/09ae323e5bc8/pone.0316416.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d0/12377583/eeaef4480c15/pone.0316416.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d0/12377583/09ae323e5bc8/pone.0316416.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d0/12377583/eeaef4480c15/pone.0316416.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Neighborhood context, genetic influences, and life satisfaction: Evidence from the German twin family panel.邻里环境、基因影响与生活满意度:来自德国双胞胎家庭面板的证据。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 25;20(8):e0316416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316416. eCollection 2025.
2
Investigation and analysis of mental health status of the older adult in western rural areas.西部农村地区老年人心理健康状况的调查与分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 16;13:1612600. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612600. eCollection 2025.
3
Feeling connected, feeling poor? The dual impact of everyday interactions with neighbors and relative deprivation on subjective well-being.感觉有联系,却感觉贫穷?与邻居的日常互动和相对剥夺对主观幸福感的双重影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2025 Sep;381:118213. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118213. Epub 2025 May 30.
4
Polygenic Risk Scores and Twin Concordance for Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder.精神分裂症和双相情感障碍的多基因风险评分与双胞胎一致性
JAMA Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 1;81(12):1246-1252. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.2406.
5
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
6
Genome-wide association study meta-analysis of dizygotic twinning illuminates genetic regulation of female fecundity.全基因组关联研究荟萃分析揭示了二倍体双胞胎的遗传调控对女性生育能力的影响。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Jan 5;39(1):240-257. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead247.
7
Have a place to live? - study on the influence of the living environment on the subjective well-being of older adults.有住处吗?——关于居住环境对老年人主观幸福感影响的研究
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 1;13(1):694. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03007-1.
8
A systematic review of relations between neighborhoods and mental health.邻里关系与心理健康之间关系的系统综述。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2006 Sep;9(3):137-54.
9
[Association between DNA methylation clock and obesity-related indicators: A longitudinal twin study].[DNA甲基化时钟与肥胖相关指标之间的关联:一项纵向双胞胎研究]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025 Jun 18;57(3):456-464. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.03.008.
10
Is Seeing Cigarettes in the Retail Environment Associated With Impulse Purchases? Findings From Surveys in Disadvantaged and Non-disadvantaged Neighborhoods in the Netherlands.在零售环境中看到香烟与冲动购买有关吗?荷兰贫困和非贫困社区的调查结果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 Jun 23;27(7):1274-1283. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaf026.

本文引用的文献

1
Socio-economic status is a social construct with heritable components and genetic consequences.社会经济地位是一种具有可遗传成分和遗传后果的社会结构。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Mar 26. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02150-4.
2
Gene-by-Environment Interaction Effects of Social Adversity on Externalizing Behavior in ABCD Youth.社会逆境对 ABCD 青少年外显行为的基因-环境交互作用影响。
Behav Genet. 2023 May;53(3):219-231. doi: 10.1007/s10519-023-10136-z. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
3
German Index of Socioeconomic Deprivation (GISD): Revision, update and applications.
德国社会经济剥夺指数(GISD):修订、更新及应用
J Health Monit. 2022 Dec 9;7(Suppl 5):2-23. doi: 10.25646/10641. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Features of urban green spaces associated with positive emotions, mindfulness and relaxation.与积极情绪、正念和放松相关的城市绿地特征。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 30;12(1):20695. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24637-0.
5
Understanding the effects of neighborhood disadvantage on youth psychopathology.理解邻里劣势对青少年精神病理学的影响。
Psychol Med. 2023 May;53(7):3036-3046. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721005080. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
6
Resource profile and user guide of the Polygenic Index Repository.多基因风险指数知识库资源简介和用户指南。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Dec;5(12):1744-1758. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01119-3. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
7
Changes in positive and negative peer influences and depressive symptoms from adolescence to young adulthood.青少年期到青年早期积极和消极同伴影响与抑郁症状的变化。
J Adolesc. 2020 Oct;84:113-122. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.08.009. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
8
Is there something special about twin families? A comparison of parenting styles in twin and non-twin families.双胞胎家庭有什么特别之处吗?双胞胎家庭和非双胞胎家庭的育儿方式比较。
Soc Sci Res. 2020 Aug;90:102441. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102441. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
9
Socioeconomic Status and Psychological Well-Being: Revisiting the Role of Subjective Socioeconomic Status.社会经济地位与心理健康:重新审视主观社会经济地位的作用。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 10;11:1303. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01303. eCollection 2020.
10
The effects of social deprivation on adolescent development and mental health.社会剥夺对青少年发展和心理健康的影响。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Aug;4(8):634-640. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30186-3. Epub 2020 Jun 12.