Suppr超能文献

瓦努阿图塔纳岛家庭中微生物安全性更高的饮用水和“改良水”与儿童营养不足的关系。

Child undernutrition in households with microbiologically safer drinking water and 'improved water' in Tanna, Vanuatu.

机构信息

Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand E-mail:

Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Water Health. 2020 Jun;18(3):416-429. doi: 10.2166/wh.2020.262.

Abstract

The Sustainable Development Goal drinking water indicators include microbiological safety measures, whereas the Millennium Development Goal indicator 'improved water' may be microbiologically unsafe. In rural Vanuatu, we undertook household surveys, child anthropometry, and tested stored drinking water, to investigate relationships between water and undernutrition. Using Escherichia coli most probable number, we categorized results according to Compartment Bag Test drinking water cutoffs: <1/100 mL (safe), 1-10/100 mL (intermediate risk), >10-100/100 mL (high risk), and >100/100 mL (very high risk). Of 201 households, 191 (95%) had microbiologically unsafe drinking water, regardless of 'improved' status. We investigated cross-sectional associations between households with microbiologically safer drinking water (≤10 E. coli/100 mL) versus 'improved water' and undernutrition among children. Of children under 5, 145 (48.8%, 95% CI: 42.8, 54.8) were stunted and 59 (19.1%, 95% CI: 14.4, 23.8) were underweight. Among households with 'improved water', the adjusted prevalence ratio (95% CI) of stunting was 0.61 (0.46, 0.80) and underweight was 0.46 (0.29, 0.73) compared with 'unimproved water'. However, we found no association between having drinking water with ≤10 E. coli/100 mL at one point in time and undernutrition. Longer-term variations in water quality and unmeasured conditions beyond water may have contributed to these associations.

摘要

可持续发展目标饮用水指标包括微生物安全措施,而千年发展目标指标“改善用水”可能存在微生物安全风险。在瓦努阿图农村,我们进行了家庭调查、儿童人体测量学和储存饮用水测试,以调查水与营养不良之间的关系。使用大肠杆菌最可能数,我们根据隔间袋测试饮用水截止值对结果进行了分类:<1/100 毫升(安全)、1-10/100 毫升(中等风险)、>10-100/100 毫升(高风险)和>100/100 毫升(极高风险)。在 201 户家庭中,无论“改善”状况如何,191 户(95%)的饮用水都存在微生物安全风险。我们调查了微生物安全性更高的饮用水(≤10 个大肠杆菌/100 毫升)的家庭与“改善水”以及儿童营养不良之间的横断面关联。在 5 岁以下的儿童中,145 名(48.8%,95%置信区间:42.8,54.8)发育迟缓,59 名(19.1%,95%置信区间:14.4,23.8)体重不足。在使用“改善水”的家庭中,发育迟缓的调整后患病率比(95%置信区间)为 0.61(0.46,0.80),体重不足为 0.46(0.29,0.73),与“未改善水”相比。然而,我们发现,在某个时间点饮用水中大肠杆菌含量≤10 个/100 毫升与营养不良之间没有关联。水质的长期变化以及超出水的因素可能导致了这些关联。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验