Department of Radiology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, 7, Keunjaebong-gil, Hwaseong-si, Gyeonggi-do, 18450, South Korea.
Medical Imaging Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Sg Buloh Campus, 47000 Sg, Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jun 26;21(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03432-w.
To evaluate paraspinal back muscles of asymptomatic subjects using qualitative and quantitative analysis on CT and MRI and correlate the results with demographic data.
Twenty-nine asymptomatic subjects were enrolled prospectively (age: mean 34.31, range 23-50; 14 men, 15 women) from August 2016 to April 2017. Qualitative analysis of muscles was done using Goutallier's system on CT and MRI. Quantitative analysis entailed cross sectional area (CSA) on CT and MRI, Hounsfield unit (HU) on CT, fat fraction using two-point Dixon technique on MRI. Three readers independently analyzed the images; intra- and inter-observer agreements were measured. Linear regression and Spearman's analyses were used for correlation with demographic data.
CSA values were significantly higher in men (p < 0.001). Fat fraction was higher (22.53% vs. 14.35%) and HU lower (36.00 vs. 47.43) in women (p < 0.001). Intra- and inter-observer reliabilities of the two methods were greater than 0.8, except for CSA of L5/S1 on MRI; however, regarding quantitative analysis, decreasing HU and increasing fat fraction were correlated with increasing age, female gender and lower lumbar segment (p < 0.001).
MRI and CT can be reliably used for qualitative and quantitative analysis of paraspinal back muscles, regarding fat content. Fat fraction and HU showed highest reliabilities.
通过 CT 和 MRI 的定性和定量分析评估无症状受试者的竖脊肌,并将结果与人口统计学数据相关联。
2016 年 8 月至 2017 年 4 月前瞻性纳入 29 名无症状受试者(年龄:平均 34.31 岁,范围 23-50 岁;14 名男性,15 名女性)。使用 Goutallier 系统对 CT 和 MRI 上的肌肉进行定性分析。定量分析包括 CT 上的横截面积(CSA)、CT 上的 Hounsfield 单位(HU)、MRI 上的两点 Dixon 技术的脂肪分数。三名读者独立分析图像;测量了观察者内和观察者间的一致性。使用线性回归和 Spearman 分析与人口统计学数据进行相关性分析。
男性 CSA 值显著更高(p<0.001)。女性的脂肪分数更高(22.53%比 14.35%),HU 更低(36.00 比 47.43)(p<0.001)。两种方法的观察者内和观察者间可靠性均大于 0.8,除了 MRI 上的 L5/S1 CSA 外;然而,就定量分析而言,HU 值降低和脂肪分数增加与年龄增加、女性性别和较低的腰椎节段相关(p<0.001)。
MRI 和 CT 可用于竖脊肌的定性和定量分析,与脂肪含量有关。脂肪分数和 HU 具有最高的可靠性。