Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, 13EN-228, Toronto, ON, M5G2C4, Canada.
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 26;20(1):1013. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09159-6.
Migrants experience disparities in healthcare quality, in particular women migrants. Despite international calls to improve healthcare quality for migrants, little research has addressed this problem. Patient-centred care (PCC) is a proven approach for improving patient experiences and outcomes. This study reviewed published research on PCC for migrants.
We conducted a scoping review by searching MEDLINE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library for English-language qualitative or quantitative studies published from 2010 to June 2019 for studies that assessed PCC for adult immigrants or refugees. We tabulated study characteristics and findings, and mapped findings to a 6-domain PCC framework.
We identified 581 unique studies, excluded 538 titles/abstracts, and included 16 of 43 full-text articles reviewed. Most (87.5%) studies were qualitative involving a median of 22 participants (range 10-60). Eight (50.0%) studies involved clinicians only, 6 (37.5%) patients only, and 2 (12.5%) both patients and clinicians. Studies pertained to migrants from 19 countries of origin. No studies evaluated strategies or interventions aimed at either migrants or clinicians to improve PCC. Eleven (68.8%) studies reported barriers of PCC at the patient (i.e. language), clinician (i.e. lack of training) and organization/system level (i.e. lack of interpreters). Ten (62.5%) studies reported facilitators, largely at the clinician level (i.e. establish rapport, take extra time to communicate). Five (31.3%) studies focused on women, thus we identified few barriers (i.e. clinicians dismissed their concerns) and facilitators (i.e. women clinicians) specific to PCC for migrant women. Mapping of facilitators to the PCC framework revealed that most pertained to 2 domains: fostering a healing relationship and exchanging information. Few facilitators mapped to the remaining 4 domains: address emotions/concerns, manage uncertainty, make decisions, and enable self-management.
While few studies were included, they revealed numerous barriers of PCC at the patient, clinician and organization/system level for immigrants and refugees from a wide range of countries of origin. The few facilitators identified pertained largely to 2 PCC domains, thereby identifying gaps in knowledge of how to achieve PCC in 4 domains, and an overall paucity of knowledge on how to achieve PCC for migrant women.
移民在医疗质量方面存在差异,尤其是女性移民。尽管国际社会呼吁提高移民的医疗质量,但很少有研究解决这个问题。以患者为中心的护理(PCC)是改善患者体验和结果的一种经过验证的方法。本研究综述了已发表的关于移民的 PCC 研究。
我们通过搜索 MEDLINE、CINAHL、SCOPUS、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆,对 2010 年至 2019 年 6 月期间发表的评估成年移民或难民的 PCC 的英语定性或定量研究进行了范围界定审查。我们列出了研究特征和发现,并将发现映射到 6 个 PCC 框架领域。
我们确定了 581 篇独特的研究,排除了 538 篇标题/摘要,并对 43 篇全文文章进行了综述,其中包括 16 篇。大多数(87.5%)研究是定性的,中位数涉及 22 名参与者(范围 10-60 名)。8 项(50.0%)研究仅涉及临床医生,6 项(37.5%)仅涉及患者,2 项(12.5%)同时涉及患者和临床医生。研究涉及来自 19 个原籍国的移民。没有研究评估旨在改善 PCC 的移民或临床医生的策略或干预措施。11 项(68.8%)研究报告了患者(即语言)、临床医生(即缺乏培训)和组织/系统层面(即缺乏口译员)的 PCC 障碍。10 项(62.5%)研究报告了促进因素,主要在临床医生层面(即建立融洽关系、额外花时间沟通)。5 项(31.3%)研究重点关注女性,因此我们确定了针对移民女性的 PCC 的几个障碍(即临床医生轻视她们的担忧)和促进因素(即女性临床医生)。将促进因素映射到 PCC 框架上表明,它们大多与 2 个领域有关:培养治疗关系和交流信息。只有少数促进因素映射到其余 4 个领域:解决情绪/关注、管理不确定性、做出决策和促进自我管理。
尽管纳入的研究很少,但它们揭示了来自广泛原籍国的移民和难民在患者、临床医生和组织/系统层面上的 PCC 存在许多障碍。确定的少数促进因素主要与 2 个 PCC 领域有关,从而确定了在 4 个领域中实现 PCC 的知识差距,以及实现移民女性 PCC 的整体知识匮乏。