Istanbul University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacognosy, Istanbul, Turkey.
Marmara University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacognosy, Istanbul, Turkey.
Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2019 Sep 1;70(3):207-218. doi: 10.2478/aiht-2019-70-3273.
Valeriana is a common plant species used for various healing purposes in folk medicine since antiquity. This study investigates the phytochemical profile, antioxidant, cytotoxic, and insecticidal activity of Valeriana alliariifolia Adams, a species that has traditionally been used in Turkey. For the analyses we prepared four root extracts of V. alliariifolia Adams using hexane (HM1), chloroform (CM1), ethanol (EM1), and water (WM1) for maceration. Additionally, two extracts were also prepared from its roots by maceration separately with ethanol (EM2) and water (WM2). One sample was prepared as a water infusion (WI), according to the procedure used in Turkish traditional medicine. The 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging and 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS) radical cation scavenging activity tests showed that ethanol extracts had the strongest antioxidant activity: EM1 (IC50 - DPPH: 17.694 µg/mL; ABTS: 23.8 µg/mL) and EM2 (IC50 - DPPH: 20 µg/mL; ABTS: 21.5 µg/mL). The hexane extract, HM1, was the most cytotoxic (IC50<10 µg/mL against HepG2 and HUVEC) and EM2 strongly cytotoxic (IC50<10 µg/mL against HepG2 and IC50: 11.96 µg/mL against HUVEC). The extracts with demonstrated cytotoxic activities were further examined to check their insecticidal activity against adult female mosquito Aedes aegypti and first instar Ae. aegypti larvae. HM1 was the most effective (90±10 %), which was consistent with its cytotoxic activity. Because of the high antioxidant, cytotoxic, and insecticidal activities, we ran phytochemical analyses of the HM1, EM1, and EM2 extracts with GC-MS (for HM1) and LC-MS/MS (for EM1 and EM2). We also analysed the composition of the essential oil obtained from V. alliariifolia roots by micro-distillation in order to compare its content with HM1, which contains volatile compounds. Phytochemical analyses revealed that the major compound in HM1 was isovaleric acid (16 %) and in the essential oil 1,8-cineole (2.9 %). EM1 and EM2 contained 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid (chlorogenic acid), verbascoside (acteoside), and 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid as major components. In the light of our findings and available literature, we can conclude that V. alliariifolia has a good bioactive potential that could be used for different purposes, including the development of new agents for the treatment of various diseases. The difference in the content between the essential oil and HM1 was remarkable. It suggests that the variability observed in the activity of the samples was a result of composition and that, therefore, the aim of treatment should dictate which type of preparation is to be selected. An added value of our study is that it determined verbascoside and methylquercetin rutinoside for the first time in the Valeriana extracts.
缬草是一种常见的植物物种,自古以来就在民间医学中用于各种治疗目的。本研究调查了 Valeriana alliariifolia Adams 的植物化学特征、抗氧化、细胞毒性和杀虫活性,该物种在土耳其传统医学中一直被使用。为了进行分析,我们使用正己烷 (HM1)、氯仿 (CM1)、乙醇 (EM1) 和水 (WM1) 分别从 V. alliariifolia Adams 的根部分别制备了四种提取物。此外,还分别用乙醇 (EM2) 和水 (WM2) 从其根部制备了两种提取物。一种样品根据土耳其传统医学中的程序制备为水浸剂 (WI)。2,2-二苯基-1-苦基肼 (DPPH) 清除和 2,2'-联氮-双(3-乙基苯并噻唑啉-6-磺酸) (ABTS) 自由基阳离子清除活性测试表明,乙醇提取物具有最强的抗氧化活性:EM1(DPPH IC50:17.694 µg/mL;ABTS IC50:23.8 µg/mL) 和 EM2(DPPH IC50:20 µg/mL;ABTS IC50:21.5 µg/mL)。正己烷提取物 HM1 是最具细胞毒性的 (对 HepG2 和 HUVEC 的 IC50<10 µg/mL),而 EM2 则具有很强的细胞毒性 (对 HepG2 的 IC50<10 µg/mL,对 HUVEC 的 IC50:11.96 µg/mL)。表现出细胞毒性活性的提取物进一步进行了杀虫活性检查,以检查其对成年雌性埃及伊蚊和第一龄埃及伊蚊幼虫的杀虫活性。HM1 是最有效的 (90±10 %),这与其细胞毒性活性一致。由于具有高抗氧化、细胞毒性和杀虫活性,我们用 GC-MS (用于 HM1) 和 LC-MS/MS (用于 EM1 和 EM2) 对 HM1、EM1 和 EM2 提取物进行了植物化学分析。我们还分析了通过微蒸馏从 V. alliariifolia 根部获得的精油的组成,以便将其与含有挥发性化合物的 HM1 进行比较。植物化学分析表明,HM1 中的主要化合物是异戊酸 (16 %),而在精油中,1,8-桉叶油醇 (2.9 %)。EM1 和 EM2 含有 5-O-咖啡酰奎宁酸 (绿原酸)、马鞭草苷 (筋骨草苷) 和 3,5-二咖啡酰奎宁酸作为主要成分。根据我们的发现和现有文献,我们可以得出结论,V. alliariifolia 具有良好的生物活性潜力,可用于不同目的,包括开发用于治疗各种疾病的新药物。精油和 HM1 之间的含量差异非常显著。这表明样品活性的差异是由于成分造成的,因此,治疗的目的应该决定选择哪种类型的制剂。我们研究的一个附加值是首次在缬草提取物中确定了毛蕊花糖苷和甲基芦丁。