Marliese Dion Nist, PhD, RNC-NIC, is Postdoctoral Scholar, The Ohio State University College of Nursing, Columbus. Tondi M. Harrison, PhD, RN, FAAN, is Associate Professor, The Ohio State University College of Nursing, Columbus. Rita H. Pickler, PhD, RN, FAAN, is FloAnn Sours Easton Endowed Professor of Child and Adolescent Health, The Ohio State University College of Nursing, Columbus. Abigail B. Shoben, PhD, is Associate Professor, Division of Biostatistics, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus.
Nurs Res. 2020 Sep/Oct;69(5S Suppl 1):S3-S10. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000444.
Extended hospitalization in neonatal intensive care units subjects preterm infants to multiple stress exposures that affect long-term cognitive functioning, motor development, and stress reactivity. Measurement of stress exposure is challenging with multiple measures of stress exposure in use, including counts of skin-breaking or invasive procedures or counts of noxious sensory exposures.
The purpose of this analysis was to compare measures of stress exposure commonly used by researchers and to determine the predictive validity of these measures for early neurobehavior. We accomplished this objective through the following specific aims: (a) describe the stress exposures of preterm infants in the first 2 weeks of life, (b) determine the correlations among measures of stress exposure, and (c) compare the predictive validity of measures of stress exposure for early neurobehavior.
Very preterm infants born between 28 and 31 weeks postmenstrual age were enrolled from four neonatal intensive care units in a large Midwest city. We measured stress exposure over the first 14 days of life for each infant as a count of skin-breaking procedures, a count of invasive procedures, and cumulative scores derived from the Neonatal Infant Stressor Scale. Neurobehavior was assessed at 35 weeks postmenstrual age using the motor development and vigor and alertness/orientation subscales from the Neurobehavioral Assessment of the Preterm Infant. We used Spearman's rho to determine correlations among the measures of stress exposure and multiple linear regression to determine the predictive validity of each stress exposure measure for neurobehavioral outcomes.
Seventy-one preterm infants were included in the analysis. We found marked variance across individuals in all measures of stress exposure. There were moderate-high correlations among the measures of stress exposure. No measure of stress exposure was associated with early neurobehavior.
The stress experiences of hospitalized preterm infants vary. This variance is reflected in all measures of stress exposure. Because measures of stress exposure are highly correlated, the most objective measure requiring the least interpretation should be used. However, the currently available measures of stress exposure used in this analysis may not reflect the infant's physiological stress responses and fail to associate with early neurobehavior.
新生儿重症监护病房中的早产儿会经历多次应激暴露,这会影响其长期认知功能、运动发育和应激反应能力。目前有多种应激暴露测量方法,包括皮肤破损或有创操作的次数,或有害感官暴露的次数,因此测量应激暴露具有挑战性。
本分析旨在比较研究人员常用的应激暴露测量方法,并确定这些方法对早期神经行为的预测效度。我们通过以下具体目标来实现这一目标:(a)描述早产儿在生命的前 2 周内的应激暴露情况,(b)确定应激暴露测量方法之间的相关性,以及(c)比较应激暴露测量方法对早期神经行为的预测效度。
从美国中西部一个大城市的四个新生儿重症监护病房招募了胎龄在 28 至 31 周之间的极早产儿。我们为每个婴儿测量了生命的前 14 天内的应激暴露情况,包括皮肤破损操作的次数、有创操作的次数,以及新生儿应激量表的累积分数。在出生后 35 周时,使用新生儿行为评估中的运动发育和活力以及警觉/定向分量表评估神经行为。我们使用 Spearman's rho 确定应激暴露测量方法之间的相关性,并使用多元线性回归确定每个应激暴露测量方法对神经行为结果的预测效度。
71 名早产儿被纳入分析。我们发现,所有应激暴露测量方法在个体之间都存在显著差异。应激暴露测量方法之间存在中度至高度相关性。没有一种应激暴露测量方法与早期神经行为相关。
住院早产儿的应激经历存在差异。这种差异反映在所有应激暴露测量方法中。由于应激暴露测量方法高度相关,因此应使用最客观、需要最少解释的测量方法。然而,本分析中使用的目前现有的应激暴露测量方法可能无法反映婴儿的生理应激反应,也无法与早期神经行为相关联。