Suppr超能文献

社会、情感和存在性孤独:多维概念的检验。

Social, Emotional, and Existential Loneliness: A Test of the Multidimensional Concept.

机构信息

Department of Sociology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2021 Sep 13;61(7):e335-e344. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa082.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Since the 1980s, most researchers have agreed on the concept of social and emotional loneliness as an unacceptable and negatively experienced discrepancy between realized and desired interpersonal relationships. For other researchers, existential loneliness stems from the realization that a human being is fundamentally alone, with the accompanying emptiness, sadness, and longing. This article examines whether instruments to measure these conceptualizations indicate a multidimensional concept.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The 2019 observation of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (N = 1,316; aged 61-101 years; 52% women) included five direct questions about loneliness, the 11-item de Jong Gierveld social and emotional loneliness scale, and 14 items from the translated Existential Loneliness Questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted in Mplus.

RESULTS

Five factors were observed: direct questions, social and emotional loneliness, and loneliness in relationships and meaninglessness in life. The intercorrelations among all five factors were positive. Emotional loneliness correlated most strongly with direct questions.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Loneliness is multifaceted and means that one is not embedded in a personal network, misses closeness and intimacy, and lacks meaning in life. The emotional loneliness items most closely represent what people mean when they report loneliness.

摘要

背景与目的

自 20 世纪 80 年代以来,大多数研究人员都认同社会和情感孤独的概念,即人际关系的实际情况与期望之间存在不可接受的、负面的差距。而对于其他研究人员来说,存在性孤独源于对人类本质上是孤独的认识,以及随之而来的空虚、悲伤和渴望。本文探讨了用于测量这些概念的工具是否表明存在多维概念。

研究设计与方法

2019 年对阿姆斯特丹纵向老龄化研究(N=1316;年龄 61-101 岁;52%为女性)进行了观察,包括五个关于孤独的直接问题、11 项 de Jong Gierveld 社会和情感孤独量表以及 14 项翻译后的存在性孤独问卷。在 Mplus 中进行验证性因子分析。

结果

观察到五个因素:直接问题、社会和情感孤独、关系孤独和生活无意义。所有五个因素之间的相关性均为正相关。情感孤独与直接问题相关性最强。

讨论与意义

孤独是多方面的,意味着一个人没有融入个人网络,错过了亲密和亲密关系,并且生活缺乏意义。情感孤独的项目最能代表人们在报告孤独时的含义。

相似文献

6
Existential isolation and the struggle for belief validation.存在孤立和信仰验证的斗争。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2022 Apr;61(2):491-509. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12492. Epub 2021 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
A concept analysis of the existential experience of adults with advanced cancer.成人晚期癌症患者存在体验的概念分析。
Nurs Outlook. 2019 Sep-Oct;67(5):540-557. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
2
Meaning in life of older persons: An integrative literature review.老年人生命意义的研究:综合文献回顾。
Nurs Ethics. 2018 Dec;25(8):973-991. doi: 10.1177/0969733016680122. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
10
Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing.主观幸福感、健康与衰老。
Lancet. 2015 Feb 14;385(9968):640-648. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61489-0. Epub 2014 Nov 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验