Suppr超能文献

探讨儿童对重要公园特征的看法:使用步行访谈的定性研究。

Exploring Children's Views on Important Park Features: A Qualitative Study Using Walk-Along Interviews.

机构信息

Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia.

Institute for Health and Sport (iHeS), Victoria University, Melbourne 3011, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 27;17(13):4625. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134625.

Abstract

Parks are places where children can interact with others and engage in physical activity in a natural setting. Park visits can enhance children's social, mental, and physical health. It is therefore important to better understand how parks can be designed to ensure optimal use by children. This qualitative study explored children's perceptions of park features that may influence their park visits, park-based physical activity, and social interaction. Qualitative walk-along interviews were completed with 30 children (mean age 9.7 years (SD 1.3), female = 16) in nine parks located in varying socioeconomic areas of Melbourne, Australia. As they walked through the park, children shared thoughts regarding characteristics that may influence their visitation, park-based physical activity, and social interactions. Features that would encourage visitation included: challenging and interesting play equipment; a pond and water play area; trees/greenery and shade; and full-sized basketball courts. Features most valued for physical activity included: sports courts, ovals, and equipment; open space; trees to climb; and nature/rocks. Features most valued for social interaction included: a large size; playgrounds; and picnic areas. Children offer unique and important views. Park designers should consider inclusion of these features, when (re)developing parks to support children to lead healthy and active lives.

摘要

公园是孩子们可以与他人互动并在自然环境中进行身体活动的地方。公园的访问可以增强儿童的社会、心理和身体健康。因此,重要的是要更好地了解如何设计公园,以确保儿童能够充分利用公园。本定性研究探讨了儿童对可能影响其公园访问、基于公园的身体活动和社会互动的公园特征的看法。在澳大利亚墨尔本的九个不同社会经济区域的公园中,对 30 名儿童(平均年龄 9.7 岁(标准差 1.3),女性=16)进行了定性的步行访谈。当他们在公园中散步时,孩子们分享了他们对可能影响他们访问、基于公园的身体活动和社会互动的特征的想法。鼓励访问的特征包括:具有挑战性和趣味性的游乐设备;池塘和水上游乐区;树木/绿色植物和阴凉处;以及全尺寸的篮球场。最受重视的身体活动特征包括:运动场地、椭圆形场地和设备;开阔的空间;可供攀爬的树木;以及自然/岩石。最受重视的社会互动特征包括:面积大;游乐场;和野餐区。孩子们提供了独特而重要的观点。公园设计师在(重新)开发公园时,应考虑包含这些特征,以支持儿童过上健康和积极的生活。

相似文献

1
Exploring Children's Views on Important Park Features: A Qualitative Study Using Walk-Along Interviews.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 27;17(13):4625. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134625.
2
What do adults want in parks? A qualitative study using walk-along interviews.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 14;22(1):753. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13064-5.
3
Adolescents' ratings of features of parks that encourage park visitation and physical activity.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Jul 4;13:73. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0391-9.
6
Examining Health-Related Effects of Refurbishment to Parks in a Lower Socioeconomic Area: The ShadePlus Natural Experiment.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 21;17(17):6102. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176102.
7
Associations between park features and adolescent park use for physical activity.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Feb 18;12:21. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0178-4.
8
How active are people in metropolitan parks? An observational study of park visitation in Australia.
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 4;15:610. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1960-6.
10
Are independent mobility and territorial range associated with park visitation among youth?
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Jun 9;11:73. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-73.

引用本文的文献

2
Usability of Public Play Spaces for Children with Disabilities.
Occup Ther Int. 2023 Dec 29;2023:4306627. doi: 10.1155/2023/4306627. eCollection 2023.
4
The influence of outdoor play spaces in urban parks on children's social anxiety.
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 6;10:1046399. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1046399. eCollection 2022.
5
Urban Blue Spaces as Therapeutic Landscapes: "A Slice of Nature in the City".
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 15;19(22):15018. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215018.
7
Motivating playgrounds: understanding how school playgrounds support autonomy, competence, and relatedness of tweens.
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2022 Dec;17(1):2096085. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2022.2096085.
8
What do adults want in parks? A qualitative study using walk-along interviews.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 14;22(1):753. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13064-5.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Increasing translation of research evidence for optimal park design: a qualitative study with stakeholders.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Apr 15;17(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00952-5.
3
Perceptions of Nature and Access to Green Space in Four Urban Neighborhoods.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 29;16(13):2313. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132313.
4
Examining the Features of Parks That Children Visit During Three Stages of Childhood.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 13;16(9):1658. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16091658.
5
United States' neighborhood park use and physical activity over two years: The National Study of Neighborhood Parks.
Prev Med. 2019 Jun;123:117-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.03.027. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
7
Outdoor physical activity bears multiple benefits to health and society.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2019 May;59(5):868-879. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.18.08771-6. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
8
Renovations of neighbourhood parks: long-term outcomes on physical activity.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Mar;73(3):214-218. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-210791. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
9
Physical Activity and Fundamental Motor Skill Performance of 5⁻10 Year Old Children in Three Different Playgrounds.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 31;15(9):1896. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091896.
10
Park Use and Park-Based Physical Activity in Low-Income Neighborhoods.
J Aging Phys Act. 2019 Jun 1;27(3):334-342. doi: 10.1123/japa.2018-0032. Epub 2018 Nov 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验