Lev-Sagie Ahinoam, Wertman Osnat, Lavee Yoav, Granot Michal
Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel, and Clalit Health Organization, 12 Faran St, Jerusalem 9780214, Israel.
School of Social Work, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel.
J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 27;9(7):2023. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072023.
The pathophysiology underlying painful intercourse is challenging due to variability in manifestations of vulvar pain hypersensitivity. This study aimed to address whether the anatomic location of vestibular-provoked pain is associated with specific, possible causes for insertional dyspareunia. Women ( = 113) were assessed for "anterior" and "posterior" provoked vestibular pain based on vestibular tenderness location evoked by a Q-tip test. Pain evoked during vaginal intercourse, pain evoked by deep muscle palpation, and the severity of pelvic floor muscles hypertonicity were assessed. The role of potential confounders (vestibular atrophy, umbilical pain hypersensitivity, hyper-tonus of pelvic floor muscles and presence of a constricting hymenal-ring) was analyzed to define whether distinctive subgroups exist. Q-tip stimulation provoked posterior vestibular tenderness in all participants (6.20 ± 1.9). However, 41 patients also demonstrated anterior vestibular pain hypersensitivity (5.24 ± 1.5). This group (circumferential vestibular tenderness), presented with either vestibular atrophy associated with hormonal contraception use ( = 21), or augmented tactile umbilical-hypersensitivity ( = 20). The posterior-only vestibular tenderness group included either women with a constricting hymenal-ring ( = 37) or with pelvic floor hypertonicity ( = 35). Interestingly, pain evoked during intercourse did not differ between groups. Linear regression analyses revealed augmented coital pain experience, umbilical-hypersensitivity and vestibular atrophy predicted enhanced pain hypersensitivity evoked at the anterior, but not at the posterior vestibule (R = 0.497, < 0.001). Distinguishing tactile hypersensitivity in anterior and posterior vestibule and recognition of additional nociceptive markers can lead to clinical subgrouping.
由于外阴疼痛超敏反应的表现存在差异,性交疼痛背后的病理生理学具有挑战性。本研究旨在探讨前庭诱发性疼痛的解剖位置是否与插入性性交困难的特定可能原因相关。根据棉签试验诱发的前庭压痛位置,对113名女性进行了“前部”和“后部”前庭诱发性疼痛评估。评估了性交时诱发的疼痛、深部肌肉触诊诱发的疼痛以及盆底肌肉高张力的严重程度。分析了潜在混杂因素(前庭萎缩、脐部疼痛超敏反应、盆底肌肉高张力和狭窄处女膜环的存在)的作用,以确定是否存在不同的亚组。棉签刺激在所有参与者中均诱发了后部前庭压痛(6.20±1.9)。然而,41名患者也表现出前部前庭疼痛超敏反应(5.24±1.5)。这一组(环形前庭压痛),要么与使用激素避孕药相关的前庭萎缩(21例),要么触觉性脐部超敏反应增强(20例)。仅后部前庭压痛组包括有狭窄处女膜环的女性(37例)或盆底高张力的女性(35例)。有趣的是,各组之间性交时诱发的疼痛没有差异。线性回归分析显示,性交疼痛体验增强、脐部超敏反应和前庭萎缩预测前部前庭诱发的疼痛超敏反应增强,但后部前庭则不然(R=0.497,P<0.001)。区分前部和后部前庭的触觉超敏反应以及识别其他伤害性标记物可导致临床亚组分类。