• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

揭示 2020 年春季切尔诺贝利隔离区早期野火后释放的放射性核素的迁移、沉积和影响。

Uncovering transport, deposition and impact of radionuclides released after the early spring 2020 wildfires in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone.

机构信息

Department of Atmospheric and Climate Research (ATMOS), Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU), Instituttveien 18, PO Box 100, 2027, Kjeller, Norway.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 30;10(1):10655. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67620-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-67620-3
PMID:32606447
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7327000/
Abstract

In the beginning of April 2020, large fires that started in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone (CEZ) established after the Chernobyl accident in 1986 caused media and public concerns about the health impact from the resuspended radioactivity. In this paper, the emissions of previously deposited radionuclides from these fires are assessed and their dispersion and impact on the population is examined relying on the most recent data on radioactive contamination and emission factors combined with satellite observations. About 341 GBq of Cs, 51 GBq of Sr, 2 GBq of Pu, 33 MBq of Pu, 66 MBq of Pu and 504 MBq of Am were released in 1st-22nd April 2020 or about 1,000,000,000 times lower than the original accident in 1986 and mostly distributed in Central and East Europe. The large size of biomass burning particles carrying radionuclides prevents long-range transport as confirmed by concentrations reported in Europe. The highest cumulative effective doses (> 15 μSv) were calculated for firefighters and the population living in the CEZ, while doses were much lower in Kiev (2-5 μSv) and negligible in Belarus, Russia and Europe. All doses are radiologically insignificant and no health impact on the European population is expected from the April 2020 fires.

摘要

2020 年 4 月初,1986 年切尔诺贝利事故后建立的切尔诺贝利隔离区(CEZ)发生大火,引发了媒体和公众对放射性物质再悬浮造成的健康影响的关注。在本文中,评估了这些火灾中先前沉积的放射性核素的排放情况,并依靠放射性污染和排放因子的最新数据以及卫星观测,研究了它们的分散和对人口的影响。2020 年 4 月 1 日至 22 日,约有 341GBq 的 Cs、51GBq 的 Sr、2GBq 的 Pu、33MBq 的 Pu、66MBq 的 Pu 和 504MBq 的 Am 被释放,比 1986 年最初的事故释放量低约 10 亿倍,主要分布在中欧和东欧。携带放射性核素的生物质燃烧颗粒的大尺寸阻止了远距离传输,这一点已被欧洲报告的浓度所证实。消防员和 CEZ 居民的累积有效剂量最高(>15μSv),而在基辅的剂量要低得多(2-5μSv),在白俄罗斯、俄罗斯和欧洲则可以忽略不计。所有剂量在放射性上都是微不足道的,预计 2020 年 4 月的火灾不会对欧洲人口造成健康影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a62/7327000/c604a8eb0e8f/41598_2020_67620_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a62/7327000/8e3a7edd60a8/41598_2020_67620_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a62/7327000/f4a3b8bb38a6/41598_2020_67620_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a62/7327000/d78cc845b874/41598_2020_67620_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a62/7327000/57caf788203d/41598_2020_67620_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a62/7327000/c604a8eb0e8f/41598_2020_67620_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a62/7327000/8e3a7edd60a8/41598_2020_67620_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a62/7327000/f4a3b8bb38a6/41598_2020_67620_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a62/7327000/d78cc845b874/41598_2020_67620_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a62/7327000/57caf788203d/41598_2020_67620_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a62/7327000/c604a8eb0e8f/41598_2020_67620_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Uncovering transport, deposition and impact of radionuclides released after the early spring 2020 wildfires in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone.揭示 2020 年春季切尔诺贝利隔离区早期野火后释放的放射性核素的迁移、沉积和影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 30;10(1):10655. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67620-3.
2
Resuspension and atmospheric transport of radionuclides due to wildfires near the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in 2015: An impact assessment.2015年切尔诺贝利核电站附近野火导致放射性核素的再悬浮和大气传输:影响评估
Sci Rep. 2016 May 17;6:26062. doi: 10.1038/srep26062.
3
Europe-Wide Atmospheric Radionuclide Dispersion by Unprecedented Wildfires in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone, April 2020.2020 年 4 月,切尔诺贝利隔离区前所未有的野火导致欧洲范围内大气放射性核素扩散。
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Oct 19;55(20):13834-13848. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c03314. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
4
Assessment of exposures to firefighters from wildfires in heavily contaminated areas of the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone.评估切尔诺贝利隔离区重度污染地区野火对消防员的暴露情况。
J Environ Radioact. 2024 Apr;274:107410. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2024.107410. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
5
Wildfires in Chernobyl-contaminated forests and risks to the population and the environment: a new nuclear disaster about to happen?切尔诺贝利污染森林火灾及对人群和环境的风险:新的核灾难即将发生?
Environ Int. 2014 Dec;73:346-58. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.08.012. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
6
Impact of wildfire on Cs and Sr wash-off in heavily contaminated forests in the Chernobyl exclusion zone.切尔诺贝利隔离区受污染严重森林大火对 Cs 和 Sr 冲刷的影响。
Environ Pollut. 2020 Apr;259:113764. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113764. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
7
The assessment of the April 2020 chernobyl wildfires and their impact on Cs-137 levels in Belgium and The Netherlands.切尔诺贝利 2020 年野火的评估及其对比利时和荷兰 Cs-137 水平的影响。
J Environ Radioact. 2021 Oct;237:106688. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2021.106688. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
8
Model assessment of additional contamination of water bodies as a result of wildfires in the Chernobyl exclusion zone.切尔诺贝利禁区野火导致水体额外污染的模型评估。
J Environ Radioact. 2014 Dec;138:170-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.08.018. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
9
Wildfires in the Chornobyl exclusion zone-Risks and consequences.切尔诺贝利隔离区的野火——风险与后果。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2021 Nov;17(6):1141-1150. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4424. Epub 2021 May 13.
10
Simulation of ¹³⁷Cs transport and deposition after the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident and radiological doses over the Anatolian peninsula.切尔诺贝利核电站事故后 ¹³⁷Cs 的迁移和沉积模拟及安纳托利亚半岛的辐射剂量
Sci Total Environ. 2014 Nov 15;499:74-88. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.038. Epub 2014 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Large-Scale Wildfires on the Redistribution of Radionuclides in the Chornobyl River System.大规模野火对切尔诺贝利河流系统中放射性核素再分布的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Nov 19;58(46):20630-20641. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c07019. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
2
Application of a tuning-free burned area detection algorithm to the Chornobyl wildfires in 2022.一种无需调整的烧伤面积检测算法在 2022 年切尔诺贝利野火中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 31;13(1):5236. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32300-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Nuclear contamination sources in surface air of Finnish Lapland in 1965-2011 studied by means of Cs, Sr, and total beta activity.1965-2011 年芬兰拉普兰地区地表空气中的核污染来源研究:采用 Cs、Sr 和总β 活度法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jul;26(21):21511-21523. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05451-0. Epub 2019 May 24.
2
Cesium emissions from laboratory fires.实验室火灾中的铯排放。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2018 Nov;68(11):1211-1223. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2018.1493001. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
3
Reconstructing the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant (CNPP) accident 30 years after. A unique database of air concentration and deposition measurements over Europe.
30年后对切尔诺贝利核电站事故的重建。欧洲空气浓度和沉降测量的独特数据库。
Environ Pollut. 2016 Sep;216:408-418. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.05.030. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
4
Resuspension and atmospheric transport of radionuclides due to wildfires near the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in 2015: An impact assessment.2015年切尔诺贝利核电站附近野火导致放射性核素的再悬浮和大气传输:影响评估
Sci Rep. 2016 May 17;6:26062. doi: 10.1038/srep26062.
5
Chernobyl and Fukushima-where are we now?切尔诺贝利和福岛——我们如今处于何种状况?
J Radiol Prot. 2016 Jun;36(2):E1-5. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/36/2/E1. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
6
Size distributions of airborne radionuclides from the fukushima nuclear accident at several places in europe.福岛核事故在欧洲几个地方的空气放射性核素的粒径分布。
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Oct 1;47(19):10995-1003. doi: 10.1021/es401973c. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
7
Natural radioactivity levels of some medicinal plants commonly used in Ghana.加纳常用的一些药用植物的天然放射性水平。
Springerplus. 2013 Apr 11;2(1):157. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-157. Print 2013 Dec.
8
Radioactive pollution in Athens, Greece due to the Fukushima nuclear accident.福岛核事故导致希腊雅典放射性污染。
J Environ Radioact. 2012 Dec;114:100-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.12.006. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
9
Determination of radiostrontium isotopes: a review of analytical methodology.放射性锶同位素的测定:分析方法综述
Appl Radiat Isot. 2010 Dec;68(12):2306-26. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2010.05.013. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
10
Resuspension and redistribution of radionuclides during grassland and forest fires in the Chernobyl exclusion zone: part II. Modeling the transport process.切尔诺贝利禁区草原和森林火灾期间放射性核素的再悬浮和再分布:第二部分。传输过程建模。
J Environ Radioact. 2006;87(3):260-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2005.12.003. Epub 2006 Feb 14.