• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

切尔诺贝利隔离区的野火——风险与后果。

Wildfires in the Chornobyl exclusion zone-Risks and consequences.

机构信息

UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Bailrigg, Lancaster, UK.

School of Science, Engineering & Environment, University of Salford, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2021 Nov;17(6):1141-1150. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4424. Epub 2021 May 13.

DOI:10.1002/ieam.4424
PMID:33835696
Abstract

Following the 1986 Chornobyl accident, an area approaching 5000 km surrounding the nuclear plant was abandoned, creating the Chornobyl exclusion zone (CEZ). Although this area likely contains the most radioactive terrestrial ecosystem on earth, the absence of humans and associated activities for nearly 35 years since the accident has resulted in increases in wildlife numbers. Both the Belarussian and Ukrainian components of the CEZ are now designated as nature reserves; together they form one of Europe's largest protected areas and have been described as an iconic example of rewilding. Forests and former agricultural land (now scrub) dominate the CEZ and wildfires are an annual event. In April 2020, the CEZ suffered its most widespread fires to date when greater than 800 km of the 2600 km Ukrainian portion of the CEZ was burnt. Large-scale fires in the CEZ have implications for wildlife, as they do elsewhere, but they also pose additional radioecological and radiological protection questions. We discuss the implications of wildfires in the CEZ, considering effects on wildlife and changes in radionuclide mobility. We also demonstrate that the risk to firefighters and the wider public from the inhalation of radionuclides in smoke resulting from fires in the CEZ is likely to be low. However, further experimental and modeling work to evaluate potential doses to firefighters from inhaled radioactive particles would be valuable, not least for reassurance purposes. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2021;17:1141-1150 © 2021 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).

摘要

1986 年切尔诺贝利事故发生后,核电站周围近 5000 公里的区域被废弃,形成了切尔诺贝利隔离区(CEZ)。尽管这个地区可能包含了地球上放射性最强的陆地生态系统,但自事故发生近 35 年来,由于人类的缺席和相关活动的停止,野生动物的数量有所增加。CEZ 的白俄罗斯和乌克兰部分现在都被指定为自然保护区;它们共同构成了欧洲最大的保护区之一,并被誉为重新野化的标志性范例。森林和以前的农业用地(现在是灌木丛)占据了 CEZ 的主导地位,野火是每年都会发生的事件。2020 年 4 月,CEZ 遭遇了迄今为止最广泛的火灾,当时乌克兰部分的 CEZ 2600 公里中有超过 800 公里被烧毁。CEZ 内的大规模火灾对野生动物和其他地方一样有影响,但也带来了额外的放射性生态学和放射性保护问题。我们讨论了 CEZ 内野火的影响,考虑了对野生动物的影响以及放射性核素迁移性的变化。我们还表明,CEZ 火灾产生的烟雾中放射性核素的吸入对消防员和更广泛的公众造成的风险可能很低。然而,进一步的实验和建模工作,以评估消防员从吸入火灾产生的放射性粒子中潜在剂量,将是有价值的,不仅是为了提供保证。综合环境评估与管理 2021;17:1141-1150©2021 作者。综合环境评估与管理由 Wiley 期刊公司代表环境毒理与化学学会(SETAC)出版。

相似文献

1
Wildfires in the Chornobyl exclusion zone-Risks and consequences.切尔诺贝利隔离区的野火——风险与后果。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2021 Nov;17(6):1141-1150. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4424. Epub 2021 May 13.
2
Europe-Wide Atmospheric Radionuclide Dispersion by Unprecedented Wildfires in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone, April 2020.2020 年 4 月,切尔诺贝利隔离区前所未有的野火导致欧洲范围内大气放射性核素扩散。
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Oct 19;55(20):13834-13848. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c03314. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
3
Assessment of exposures to firefighters from wildfires in heavily contaminated areas of the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone.评估切尔诺贝利隔离区重度污染地区野火对消防员的暴露情况。
J Environ Radioact. 2024 Apr;274:107410. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2024.107410. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
4
Resuspension and atmospheric transport of radionuclides due to wildfires near the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in 2015: An impact assessment.2015年切尔诺贝利核电站附近野火导致放射性核素的再悬浮和大气传输:影响评估
Sci Rep. 2016 May 17;6:26062. doi: 10.1038/srep26062.
5
Impact of wildfire on Cs and Sr wash-off in heavily contaminated forests in the Chernobyl exclusion zone.切尔诺贝利隔离区受污染严重森林大火对 Cs 和 Sr 冲刷的影响。
Environ Pollut. 2020 Apr;259:113764. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113764. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
6
Application of a tuning-free burned area detection algorithm to the Chornobyl wildfires in 2022.一种无需调整的烧伤面积检测算法在 2022 年切尔诺贝利野火中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 31;13(1):5236. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32300-5.
7
Uncovering transport, deposition and impact of radionuclides released after the early spring 2020 wildfires in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone.揭示 2020 年春季切尔诺贝利隔离区早期野火后释放的放射性核素的迁移、沉积和影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 30;10(1):10655. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67620-3.
8
Wildfires in Chernobyl-contaminated forests and risks to the population and the environment: a new nuclear disaster about to happen?切尔诺贝利污染森林火灾及对人群和环境的风险:新的核灾难即将发生?
Environ Int. 2014 Dec;73:346-58. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.08.012. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
9
War drives forest fire risks and highlights the need for more ecologically-sound forest management in post-war Ukraine.战争加剧了森林火灾风险,并凸显了战后乌克兰需要进行更有利于生态的森林管理。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 19;14(1):4131. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54811-5.
10
Designing tools to predict and mitigate impacts on water quality following the Australian 2019/2020 wildfires: Insights from Sydney's largest water supply catchment.设计工具以预测和减轻澳大利亚 2019/2020 年野火对水质的影响:来自悉尼最大供水集水区的见解。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2021 Nov;17(6):1151-1161. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4406. Epub 2021 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Radionuclide contamination in Canada: A scoping review.加拿大的放射性核素污染:一项范围界定综述。
Heliyon. 2023 May 29;9(6):e16602. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16602. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Application of a tuning-free burned area detection algorithm to the Chornobyl wildfires in 2022.一种无需调整的烧伤面积检测算法在 2022 年切尔诺贝利野火中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 31;13(1):5236. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32300-5.
3
Current ionising radiation doses in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone do not directly impact on soil biological activity.
目前切尔诺贝利隔离区的电离辐射剂量不会直接影响土壤生物活性。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 23;17(2):e0263600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263600. eCollection 2022.